Skip to main content

Information Extraction to Improve Standard Compliance

The Case of Clinical Handover

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9457))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clinical handover refers to healthcare workers transferring responsibility and accountability for patient care, e.g., between shifts or wards. Safety and quality health standards call for this process to be systematically structured across the organisation and synchronous with its documentation. This paper evaluates information extraction as a way to help comply with these standards. It implements the handover process of first specifying a structured handover form, whose hierarchy of headings guides the handover narrative, followed by the technology filling it out objectively and almost instantly for proofing and sign-off. We trained a conditional random field with 8 feature types on 101 expert-annotated documents to 36-class classify. This resulted in good generalisation to an independent set of 50 validation and 50 test documents that we now release: 77.9 % F1 in filtering out irrelevant information, up to 98.4 % F1 for the 35 classes for relevant information, and 52.9 % F1 after macro-averaging over these 35 classes, whilst these percentages were 86.2, 100.0, and 70.2 for the leave-one-document-out cross-validation across the first set of 101 documents. Also as a result of this study, the validation and test data were released to support further research.

NICTA is funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Communications and the Australian Research Council through the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Centre of Excellence Program. We thank Maricel Angel, RN at NICTA, for helping HS to create the dataset. LZ conducted all experiments under HS’s supervision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

References

  1. Pothier, D., Monteiro, P., Mooktiar, M., Shaw, A.: Pilot study to show the loss of important data in nursing handover. Br. J. Nurs. 14(20), 1090–1093 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tran, D.T., Johnson, M.: Classifying nursing errors in clinical management within an Australian hospital. Int. Nurs. Rev. 57(4), 454–462 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matic, J., Davidson, P., Salamonson, Y.: Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover. J. Clin. Nurs. 20(1–2), 184–189 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Finlayson, S.G., LePendu, P., Shah, N.H.: Building the graph of medicine from millions of clinical narratives. Sci. Data 1, 140032 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (ACSQHC): Standard 6: clinical handover. In: National Safety and Quality Health Standards, pp. 44–47. ACSQHC, Sydney (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. The World Health Organisation (WHO): Patient safety. Organizational tools. Communication. handover (handoff) tools. http://goo.gl/VjAikK

  7. Johnson, M., Lapkin, S., Long, V., Sanchez, P., Suominen, H., Basilakis, J., Dawson, L.: A systematic review of speech recognition technology in health care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 14, 94 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suominen, H., Hanlen, L., Goeuriot, L., Kelly, L., Jones, G.J.F.: Task 1a of the CLEF eHealth evaluation lab 2015: clinical speech recognition. In: Cappellato, L., Ferro, N., Jones, G., San Juan, E. (eds.) CLEF 2015 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suominen, H., Johnson, M., Zhou, L., Sanchez, P., Sirel, R., Basilakis, J., Hanlen, L., Estival, D., Dawson, L., Kelly, B.: Capturing patient information at nursing shift changes: methodological evaluation of speech recognition and information extraction. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(e1), e48–e66 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suominen, H., Zhou, L., Hanlen, L., Ferraro, G.: Benchmarking clinical speech recognition and information extraction: new data, methods, and evaluations. JMIR Med. Inform. 3(2), e19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., Kawasumi, Y.: The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency on physicians and nurses: a systematic review. JAMIA 12(5), 505–516 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hakes, B., Whittington, J.: Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time. J. Crit. Care 26(4), 234–241 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Banner, L., Olney, C.: Automated clinical documentation: does it allow nurses more time for patient care? Comput. Inform. Nurs. (CIN) 27(2), 75–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lafferty, J.D., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labelling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2001, pp. 282–289. Morgan Kaufmann Williamstown, MA, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, A., Osborne, M.: Regularisation techniques for conditional random fields: parameterised versus parameter-free. In: Dale, R., Wong, K.-F., Su, J., Kwong, O.Y. (eds.) IJCNLP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3651, pp. 896–907. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Meystre, S.M., Savova, G.K., Kipper-Schuler, K.C., Hurdle, J.F.: Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearb. Med. Inform. 35, 128–144 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Suominen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhou, L., Suominen, H. (2015). Information Extraction to Improve Standard Compliance. In: Pfahringer, B., Renz, J. (eds) AI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9457. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26350-2_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26350-2_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26349-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26350-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics