Skip to main content

Designing e-Sustainable Parliaments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 11))

Abstract

Parliaments are seeking legitimacy as responsive and sustainable institutions engaging citizens in the policy process by embracing Internet technologies. Social sustainability relies on participation of citizens and knowledge emerging through interaction. Parliaments as information and knowledge based organizations select different choices for sustainability structuring the e-parliament along a continuum between improving processes and engaging citizens from information provision to active citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McKenzie, S.: Social sustainability: toward some definitions. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series No. 27, Hawke Research Institute, Magill (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denhardt, R.B., Denhardt, V.J.: The new public service: putting democracy first. Nat. Civic Rev. 90, 391–400 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48, 147–160 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, H.W., Hammond, S.W.: Congressional Staffs: Invisible Force in American lawmaking. The Free Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Suchmann, M.C.: Managing legitimacy; strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 571–610 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IPU: Guidelines for Parliamentary Websites (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., Flak, L.S.: The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov. Inf. Q. 25, 400–428 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leston Bandeira, C.: Are ICTs changing parliamentary activity in the portuguese parliament? J. Legislative Stud. 13, 403–421 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, C., Webster, W.R.: The emergent ICT culture of parliamentarians: the case of the Scottish parliament. Information Polity. 13, 249–273 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Griffith, J., Leston-Bandeira, C.: How are parliaments using new media to engage with citizens? J Legislative Stud. 18, 496–513 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oppd: Information and Communication Technologies in Parliament. Tools for democracy, European Parliament, Bruxelles (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. AA, VV.: World Parliamentary Report. NU (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suurla, R., Mustajarvi, O., Markkula, M.: Developing and Implementing Knowledge Management in the Parliament of Finland. Oy Edita Ab, Helsinki (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chimenti, C.: Gli apparati delle camere. Quad. Costituzionali 3, 573–580 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leston-Bandeira, C.: The impact of the internet on Parliaments: a legislative studies framework. Parliamentary Aff. 60, 255–274 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mulder, B.: Parliamentary Futures: re-presenting the issue information, technology and dynamics of information. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 553–556 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geczi, E.: Sustainability and public participation: toward an inclusive model of democracy. Adm. Theor. Prax. 29, 375–393 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macintosh, A.: characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaiii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. AA, VV.: World Parliamentary Report. NU (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Sudairy, M.A.T., Vasista, T.G.K.: Fostering Knowledge Management and Citizen Participation via E-Governance for Achieving Sustainable Balanced Development, pp. 52–64 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lusoli, W., Ward, S., Gibson, R.: (Re)connecting politics? Parliament, the public and the internet. Parliamentary Aff. 59, 24–42 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raab, C.D., Bellamy, C.: Electronic democracy and the ‘mixed polity’. Symbiosis or conflict? In: Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S. (eds.) Electronic Democracy. Mobilisation, Organization and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 17–42. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dai, X., Norton, Ph.: The internet and parliamentary democracy in Europe. J. Legislative Stud. 13, 343–353 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Coleman, S., Taylor, J.A., Van De Donk, W.: Parliament in the age of internet. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 365–370 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coleman, S., Spiller, J.: Exploring new media effects on representative democracy. J. Legislative Stud. 9, 1–16 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zittel, T.A.: Digital parliaments and electronic democracy: a comparison between the US House, Swedish Riksdag and the German Bundestag. In: Gibson R., Römmele A., Ward S. (eds.) Electronic Democracy. Mobilisation, Organization and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 70–95. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S.: Introduction. Representative democracy and the Internet. In: Gibson, R., Römmele, A., Ward, S. (eds.) Electronic Democracy. Mobilisation, Organization and Participation Via New ICTs, pp. 1–16. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Päivärinta, T., Sæbø, Ø.: Models of e-democracy. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 818–840 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Loukis, E.: Using advanced information technologies for increasing public participation in the Greek parliament. J. Balkan Near Eastern Stud. 13, 14–28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riege, A., Linsday, N.: Knowledge management in public sector. J. Knowl. Manage. 10, 24–39 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McDermott, R.: Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. Calif. Manage. Rev. 41, 103–117 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Blumentritt, R., Johnston, R.: Towards a strategy for knowledge management. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 11, 287–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kingham, T.: e-Parliaments. The use of information and communication technologies to improve parliamentary processes. WBI, Working Papers (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Papaloi, A., Gouscos, D.: E-parliaments and novel parliament-to-citizens services. JeDEM 3, 80–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. De Rosa, R.: Il Parlamento Italiano alla prova tecnologica. Politica del Diritto. 3, 545–569

    Google Scholar 

  36. Trechsel, A.H., Kies, R., Mendez, R., Schmitter, Ph. C.: Evaluation of the Use of New Technologies in Order to Facilitate Democracy in Europe, EP, (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rose, J., Sanford, C.: Mapping eParticipation research: four central challenges. Commun. AIS 20, 909–943 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor, J.A., Burt, E.: Parliaments on the web: learning through innovation. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 503–517 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ona, S.: Exploring the use of new technologies in participation practices in legislation. J. E-Gov. 36, 79–91 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Berntzen, L., Healy, M., Hahamis, P., Dunville, D., Esteves, J.: Parliamentary web presence: a comparative review. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on e-Government, pp. 17–25. (ICEG 2006) Pittsburgh (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Loukis, E., Xenakis, A.: Evaluating parliamentary e-participation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Third International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM), London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Papaloi, A., Ravekka Staiou, E., Gouscos, D.: Blending social media with parliamentary websites: just a trend, or a promising approach to e-participation? In: Reddick, Ch. G., Aikins, S.K. (eds.) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications, pp. 259–275. Springer, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Missingham, R.: E-parliament: opening the door. Gov. Inf. Q. 28, 426–434 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. OECD: Promise and problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Oecd, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pratchett, L.: Comparing local e-democracy in europe: a preliminary report. In: DESA: E-Participation and E-Government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future, pp. 128–146. UN, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Tarabanis, K.: A framework for assessing eparticipation projects and tools. In: Proceedings of 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 1–10. (HICCS-40), Hawaii (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Marcella, R., Baxter, G., Moore, N.: An exploration of the effectiveness for the citizen of Web-based systems of communicating UK parliamentary and devolved assembly information. J. Gov. Inf. 29, 371–391 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sobaci, Z.: What the Turkish parliamentary web site offers to citizens in terms of e-participation: a content analysis. Inf. Polity 15, 227–241 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Setälä, M., Grönlund, K.: Parliamentary websites: theoretical and comparative perspectives. Inf. Polity 11, 149–162 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Coleman, S.: Connecting Parliament to the public via the internet: two case studies of online consultations. Inf. Commun. Soc. 7, 1–22 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hough, R.: Do legislative petitions systems enhance the relationship between parliament and citizens? J. Legislative Stud. 18, 479–495 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Miller, L.: E-petitions at Westminster: the way forward for democracy? Parliamentary Aff. 62, 162–177 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Malina, A., Macintosh, A., Farrell, S.: Digital democracy through electronic petitioning. Adv. Digit. Gov. 26, 137–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bochel, C.: Petition systems. contributing to representative democracy? Parliamentary Aff. 66, 798–815 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lindner, R., Riehm, U.: Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. JeDEM 1, 1–11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mambrey, P., Neumann, H.-P., Sieverdingbeck, K.: Bridging the gap between parliament and citizen? the internet services of the german Bundestag. Parliamentary Aff. 52, 480–492 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Saalfeld, T., Dobmeier, R.: The Bundestag and german citizens: more communication growing distance. J. Legislative Stud. 18, 314–333 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Islam, M.S.: Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. Eur. J. ePractice 5, 1–12 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro Romanelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Romanelli, M. (2016). Designing e-Sustainable Parliaments. In: Torre, T., Braccini, A., Spinelli, R. (eds) Empowering Organizations. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics