Skip to main content

Descartes, René (1596–1650): His Scientific Work and Its Reception

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 56 Accesses

Introduction

René Descartes (1596–1650) is often presented as the founder of the “dualistic” thesis radically separating the soul from the body, in early modern philosophy. As such, he is likely to have initiated two kinds of revolutions: a revolution in the study of nature and living being (understood as inanimate), on the one hand, and a revolution in the study of the human mind (understood as the foundation of all knowledge), on the other. This entry focuses on his scientific work and overall reception, as a way of understanding the interaction of these two fields.

Scientific themes occupied a structuring place in Descartes’ intellectual biography. They are at the heart of two major tensions. The first is between the importance Descartes attaches to these themes early on and the time he takes to make his results public. And the second one concerns the highly controversial dimension of these themes.

First, Descartes abandoned the publication of The World (or Treatise on Light) and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Agostini I (2019) Descartes’ philosophical theology. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 209–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut D (as Kolesnik-Antoine D) (2009) L’Homme cartésien. La “force qu’a l’âme de mouvoir le corps”: Descartes, Malebranche. PUR, Rennes

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut D (2019) Descartes, politics and “true human beings”. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 240–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut D, Gaukroger S (eds) (2017) Descartes’s treatise on man and its reception. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut D, Pellegrin M-F (2014) Élisabeth face à Descartes: deux philosophes ? Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine-Mahut D, Roux S (eds) (2018) Physics and metaphysics in Descartes and his reception. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Armogathe JR (1977) Theologia cartesiana.L’explication physique de l’eucharistie dans Descartes et dom Robert Desgabets. La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Armogathe JR (2019) Cartesianism and Eucharistic physics. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 547–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Armogathe JR, Belgioioso G (eds) (1996) Descartes : Principia Philosophiae (1644–1994). Vivarium, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Azouvi F (2002) Descartes et la France. Histoire d’une passion nationale. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellis D (2019) Between fake, unfortunate, and actual dependence : the tumultuous relationships of Descartes’ physics and metaphysics in the first half of 20th-century history and philosophy of science. In: Antoine-Mahut D, Roux S (eds) Physics and metaphysics in Descartes’ philosophy and in its reception. Studies in seventeenth-century philosophy. Routledge, New York, pp 48–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellis D (2010) Le visible et l’invisible dans la pensée cartésienne: figuration, imagination et vision dans la philosophie naturelle de René Descartes. PhD thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen/Paris-Sorbonne

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyssade JM (1997) Descartes politique ? In: Soual P, Vetö M (eds) Chemins de Descartes, colloque de Poitiers. L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyssade JM (2001a) Etudes sur Descartes. L’histoire d’un esprit. Le Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyssade JM (2001b) Descartes au fil de l’ordre. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol-Hespériès A (1996) Le principe de vie chez Descartes. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghero C (2011) Les Cartésiens face à Newton. Philosophie, science et religion dans la première moitié du XVIIIe siècle. Brepols, Turnhout

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bos H (2001) Redefining geometrical exactness. Descartes’ transformation of the early modern concept of construction. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem G (1955) La formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraud V (2002) Causa sive ratio. La raison de la cause, de Suarez à Leibniz. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaillé JP (1991) Descartes et la fable du monde. Vrin/EHESS, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (1982) Descartes’ philosophy of science. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (2003) Descartes’ theory of mind. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (2006) Descartes. A biography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (2010) The physics and the metaphysics of the mind : Descartes and Regius. In: Cottingham J, Hacker P (eds) Mind, method and morality. Essays in honor of Anthony Kenny. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (2018) Descartes, a priori knowledge and metaphysics. In: Antoine-Mahut D, Roux S (eds) Physics and metaphysics in Descartes’ philosophy and in its reception. Studies in seventeenth-century philosophy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerselier C (1657, 1659 and 1667) Lettres de Monsieur Descartes, où sont traitées les plus belles questions de la morale, de la physique, de la médecine et des mathématiques, 3 vols. Charles Angot, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerselier C (1664) L’Homme de René Descartes et un Traité de la formation du foetus du même auteur. Avec les Remarques de Louis de la Forge Docteur en médecine, demeurant à La Flèche, sur le Traité de L’Homme de René Descartes et sur les figures par lui inventées. Jacques Le Gras, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousin V (1824–1826) Oeuvres complètes de Descartes, 11 vols. Pichon et Dider, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio D (1994) Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Buzon F (2013) La science cartésienne et son objet. Mathesis et phénomènes. Champion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear P (2019) Revolutionizing the sciences. European knowledge in transition, 1500–1700, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Prete A (2015) Y a-t-il une théologie cartésienne? In: Antoine-Mahut D, Secretan C (eds) Les Pays-Bas aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Honoré Champion, Paris, pp 89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Prete A (2018) Accomodare la teologia alla mia maniera di filosofare. Descartes sui rapporti tra la filosofia e la teologi. Rivista di filosofia CVIX 2:197–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Chene D (1996) Physiologia. Natural philosophy in late Aristotelian and Cartesian thought. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Chene D (2001) Spirits and clocks : machine and organism in Descartes. Cornell University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1996) Œuvres de Descartes, 11 vols, Adam C, Tannery P eds, J. Vrin, Paris [cited as AT followed by volume and page number]

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (2018, 1rst ed 1989) Correspondance avec Elisabeth et autres lettres, ed JM Beyssade. Garnier Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillairs L (2004) Descartes et la connaissance de Dieu. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobre M, Nyden T (eds) (2016) Cartesian empiricisms. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesneau F (1998) Les modèles du vivant de Descartes à Leibniz. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbersmeyer S, Hutton S (eds) (forthcoming) Elisabeth of Bohemia (1618–1680). A philosopher in historical context. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichant M (1998) Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. PUF, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucher de Careil A (1859 and 1860) Œuvres inédites de Descartes, 2 vols. Auguste Durant, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucher de Careil A (1879) Descartes, la princesse Elisabeth et la Reine Christine. Paris, Germer-Baillière et Cie, Paris; Frédérik Muller et Cie, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs T (2001) The mechanization of the heart: Harvey and Descartes. The University of Rochester Press, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber D (1992) Descartes’ metaphysical physics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber D (2000) Descartes embodied. Reading Cartesian philosophy through Cartesian science. Cambridge University Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger S (1997) Descartes: an intellectual biography. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger S (2002) Descartes’ system of natural philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger S, Schuster J, Sutton J (eds) (2000) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouhier H (1987) La pensée métaphysique de Descartes, 5th edn. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Grmek MD (1990) La première révolution biologique. Payot, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenancia P (1983, reed. 2012) Descartes et l’ordre politique, 2nd ed. PUF/Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenancia P (1998) L’intelligence du sensible. Essai sur le dualisme cartésien. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallyn F (2006) Descartes. Dissimulation et ironie. Droz, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Harth E (1992) Cartesian women. Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield G (1993) Reason, nature and god in Descartes. In: Voss S (ed) Essays on the philosophy of science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 259–287

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield G (2014) Activity and passivity in theories of perception: Descartes to Kant. In: Silva J-F, Yrjonsuri M (eds) Active perception in the history of philosophy: from Plato to modern philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp 275–289

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield G (2015) On natural geometry and seeing distance directly in Descartes. In: de Risi V (ed) Mathematizing space: the objects of geometry from antiquity to the modern age. Birkhaeuser, Berlin, pp 157–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield G (2016) L’Homme in psychology and neuroscience. In: Antoine-Mahut D, Gaukroger S (eds) Descartes’ Treatise on Man and its reception. Springer, Cham, pp 269–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins BR, Eriksen CB, Wolfe CT (2016) The embodied Descartes: contemporary readings of L’Homme. In: Antoine-Mahut D, Gaukroger S (eds) Descartes’ Treatise on Man and its reception. Springer, Cham, pp 287–304

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien V (1996) Descartes et la “Gométrie” de 1637. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien V (2006) Philosophie naturelle et mathématiques au XVIIe siècle. Champion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambouchner D (1995a) L’Homme des passions. Albin Michel, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambouchner D (1995b) Descartes et la communication des passions. Rue Descartes, 74-91. Repr. In: Descartes et la philosophie morale. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambouchner D (2019) Descartes and the passions. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte J (1945 3rd ed. 1988) Le rationalisme de Descartes. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Liard L (1882) Descartes. Germer-Bailliere, Paris. 3d revised edition, Alcan

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning G (2018) Health in the early modern philosophical tradition. In: Adamson P (ed) Health: a history. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 180–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning G (2019) Descartes and medicine. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook for Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 157–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion JL (1981) Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion JL (1986) Sur le prisme métaphysique de Descartes. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson W (1966) Why the mind body problem isn’t ancient. In: Feyerabend PK, Maxwell G (eds) Mind, matter, and method: essays in philosophy and science in honor of Herbert Feigel. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 92–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhaud G (1921) Descartes savant. F. Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) (2019) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodis-Lewis G (1995) Descartes. Calmann-Lévy, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger J (1963) Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle. La génération des animaux de Descartes à l’Encyclopédie. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty A (1992) Descartes on thinking with the body. In: Cottingham J (ed) The Cambridge companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 370–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschuh KE (1953) Geschichte der Physiologie. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roux S (2018) L’empreinte cartésienne. L’interaction psychophysique, débats classiques et contemporains. Classiques Garnier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L (2003) The health of the body-machine? Or seventeenth century mechanism and the concept of health. Perspect Sci 11(4):421–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L (2007) The correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Edited and translated by Lisa Shapiro. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L (2019) Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia as a Cartesian. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 287–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons A (2001) Sensible ends: latent teleology in Descartes’ account of sensation. J Hist Philos 39(1):49–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (1998) Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (2000) The body and the brain. In: Gaukroger S, Sutton J, Schuster J (eds) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London, pp 697–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ruler H (2019) Philosopher defying the philosophers. Descartes’ life and works. In: Nadler S, Schmaltz T, Antoine-Mahut D (eds) The Oxford handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek T (1992) Descartes and the Dutch: early reactions to Cartesian philosophy, 1637–1650. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss S (ed) (1993) Essays on the philosophy of science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C (2000) Descartes and the corporeal mind. Some implications of the Regius affair. In: Gaukroger S, Schuster J, Sutton J (eds) Descartes’ natural philosophy. Routledge, London/New York, pp 659–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe CT (2020) Life as Concept and as Science in Early Modern Thought. In D Jalobeanu and CT Wolfe (eds.), Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delphine Antoine-Mahut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Antoine-Mahut, D. (2021). Descartes, René (1596–1650): His Scientific Work and Its Reception. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_608-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_608-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics