Skip to main content

Brain-Computer Interface: Usability Evaluation of Different P300 Speller Configurations: A Preliminary Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9094))

Abstract

Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) is particularly relevant as a new way to interact with the outside world for disabled people. Based on P300 event-related potentials (ERPs) BCIs have been frequently used for communication purposes, being the first P300-based BCI paradigm developed by Farwell and Donchin for visual speller. P300-BCI speller studies require a significant attentional demand during sustained long times which could represent fatigue and feeling of increasing workload. The evaluation of workload while using P300-BCI speller requires taking into account the cognitive, emotional and physical state of participant during task. This would help to improve usability of the system. The objective of the study is to evaluate, through objective and subjective measures, three different size of speller in order to analyze effectiveness, cognitive load and user comfort. Three healthy subjects took part in the experiment. The preliminary results suggest that speller size can have different effects on user performance and represent important workload for subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology 113(6), 767–791 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Birbaumer, N.: Breaking the silence: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. Psychophysiology 43(6), 517–532 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mak, J., Wolpaw, J.: Clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces: Current state and future prospects. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 2, 187–199 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farwell, L., Donchin, E.: Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 70(6), 510–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bianchi, L., Sami, S., Hillebrand, A., Fawcett, I., Quitadamo, L., Seri, S.: Which physiological components are more suitable for visual ERP based brain-computer interface? A preliminary MEG/EEG study. Brain Topography 23(2), 180–185 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleih, S., Nijboer, F., Halder, S., Kübler, A.: Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain- computer interface use. Clinical Neurophysiology 121(7), 1023–1031 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krusienski, D., Sellers, E., McFarland, D., Vaughan, T., Wolpaw, J.: Toward enhanced P300 speller performance. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 167(1), 15–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sellers, E.W., Krusienski, D.J., McFarland, D.J., Vaughan, T.M., Wolpaw, J.R.: A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biological Psychology 73(3), 242–252 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Donchin, E., Spencer, K., Wijesinghe, R.: The mental prosthesis: Assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8(2), 174–179 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, C., Guan, C., Zhang, H.: P300 brain-computer interface design for communication and control applications. In: 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE-EMBS 2005, pp. 5400–5403 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sellers, E.W., Donchin, E.: A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 117(3), 538–548 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nielsen, J.: What is usability? In: Usability Engineering, pp. 23–48. Academic Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen, J., Mark, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Frojkaer, E., Hertzum, M., Hornbaek, K.: Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated. In: CHI 2000, pp. 345-352. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chanquoy, L., Tricot, A. Sweller J.: La charge cognitive. Edition Armand Colin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jeng, J.: Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: Effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri 55(2–3), 96–121 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hertzum, M.: Images of usability. International journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 26, 567–600 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kececi, H., Degirmenci, Y., Atakay, S.: Habituation and dishabituation of P300. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology 19(3), 130–134 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murata, A., Uetake, A.: Evaluation of mental fatigue in human-computer interaction - analysis using feature parameters extracted from event-related potential. In: 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 630–635 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mangun, G.R., Buck, L.A.: Sustained visual spatial attention produces costs and benefits in response time and evoked neural activity. Neuropsychologia 36(3), 189–200 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Polich, J., Kok, A.: Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: An integrative review. Biological Psychology 41(2), 103–146 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schalk, G., McFarland, D., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., Wolpaw, J.: Bci 2000: A general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51(6), 1034–1043 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, J., Speier, W., Hu, X., Pouratian, N.: The effects of stimulus timing features on P300 speller performance. Clinical Neurophysiology 124(2), 306–314 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McFarland, D.J., Sarnacki, W.A., Townsend, G., Vaughan, T., Wolpaw, J.R.: The P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI): Effects of stimulus rate. Clinical Neurophysiology 122(4), 731–737 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shih, J.J., Townsend, G., Krusienski, D.J., Shih, K.D., Shih, R.M., Heggeli, K., Paris, T., Meschia, J.F.: Comparison of checkerboard P300 speller vs. row-column speller in normal elderly and aphasic stroke population. Paper Presented at the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting, Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, CA (2013). http://castor.tugraz.at/doku/BCIMeeting2013/020.pdf (retrieved)

  27. Allison, B.Z., Pineda, J.A.: ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11, 110–113 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y., Nam, C.S., Shadden, B., Johnson, S.: A P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI): effects of interface type and screen size. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27(1), 52–68 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cegarra, J., Morgado, N.: Étude des propriétés de la version francophone du NASATLX. In: Communication Présentée à La Cinquième édition Du Colloque De Psychologie Ergonomique (Epique) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Treder, M.S.: Blankertz, B,: Covert attentionand visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-commputer interface. Behav. Brain Funct. 6, 28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brunner, P., Joshi, S., Briskin, S., Wolpaw, J.R., Bischof, H., Schalk, G.: Does the “P300” Speller Depend on Eye Gaze? J Neural Eng 7, 056013 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvaris, M., Sepulveda, F.: Visual modifications on the P300 speller BCI paradigm. J Neural Eng 6(4), 046011 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim, E., Lovera, J., Schaben, L., Melara, J., Bourdette, D., Whitman, R.: Novel method for measurement of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Real-Time Digital Fatigue Score. J Rehabil Res Dev. 47(5), 477–484 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Garcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garcia, L. et al. (2015). Brain-Computer Interface: Usability Evaluation of Different P300 Speller Configurations: A Preliminary Study. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Catala, A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9094. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19258-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19258-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19257-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19258-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics