Skip to main content

Mining Multi-variant Process Models from Low-Level Logs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 208))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process discovery techniques are a precious tool for analyzing the real behavior of a business process. However, their direct application to lowly structured logs may yield unreadable and inaccurate models. Current solutions rely on event abstraction or trace clustering, and assume that log events refer to well-defined (possibly low-level) process tasks. This reduces their suitability for logs of real BPM systems (e.g. issue management) where each event just stores several data fields, none of which fully captures the semantics of performed activities. We here propose an automated method for discovering an expressive kind of process model, consisting of three parts: (i) a logical event clustering model, for abstracting low-level events into classes; (ii) a logical trace clustering model, for discriminating among process variants; and (iii) a set of workflow schemas, each describing one variant in terms of the discovered event clusters. Experiments on a real-life data confirmed the capability of the approach to discover readable high-quality process models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the tests described in Sect. 5 we always set \(\sigma =0.01 \cdot |traces(L)|\).

  2. 2.

    Available at http://www.win.tue.nl/bpi/2013/challenge.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., et al.: Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data Knowl. Eng. 47(2), 237–267 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baier, T., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Bridging abstraction layers in process mining. Inf. Syst. 46, 123–139 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blockeel, H., De Raedt, L.: Top-down induction of first-order logical decision trees. Artif. Intell. 101(1–2), 285–297 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Trace clustering based on conserved patterns: towards achieving better process models. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 170–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Context aware trace clustering: towards improving process mining results. In: SDM 2009, pp. 401–412 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, R.P., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Abstractions in process mining: a taxonomy of patterns. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 159–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: On the role of fitness, precision, generalization and simplicity in process discovery. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 305–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. De Weerdt, J., van den Broucke, S., et al.: Active trace clustering for improved process discovery. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(12), 2708–2720 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greco, G., Guzzo, A., et al.: Discovering expressive process models by clustering log traces. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18(8), 1010–1027 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Günther, C.W., Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Activity mining by global trace segmentation. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 128–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, X.: Unraveling and learning workflow models from interleaved event logs. In: ICWS 2014, pp. 193–200 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Medeiros, A.A.: Genetic Process Mining. Ph.D. thesis, TU/e (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weidlich, M., Polyvyanyy, A., et al.: Process compliance analysis based on behavioural profiles. Inf. Syst. 36(7), 1009–1025 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weijters, A.J.M.M., Ribeiro, J.T.S.: Flexible heuristics miner (FHM). In: CIDM 2011, pp. 310–317 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Pontieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L. (2015). Mining Multi-variant Process Models from Low-Level Logs. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19026-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19027-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics