Abstract
The structure of real-world social networks in large part determines the evolution of social phenomena, including opinion formation, diffusion of information and influence, and the spread of disease. Globally, network structure is characterized by features such as degree distribution, degree assortativity, and clustering coefficient. However, information about global structure is usually not available to each vertex. Instead, each vertex’s knowledge is generally limited to the locally observable portion of the network consisting of the subgraph over its immediate neighbors. Such subgraphs, known as ego networks, have properties that can differ substantially from those of the global network. In this paper, we study the structural properties of ego networks and show how they relate to the global properties of networks from which they are derived. Through empirical comparisons and mathematical derivations, we show that structural features, similar to static attributes, suffer from paradoxes. We quantify the differences between global information about network structure and local estimates. This knowledge allows us to better identify and correct the biases arising from incomplete local information.
This work was supported in part by AFOSR (contract FA9550-10-1-0569), by NSF (grant CIF-1217605) and by DARPA (contract W911NF-12-1-0034).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, R., Barabási, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74(1), 47 (2002)
Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Mundra, K.: Social networks and their impact on the earnings of Mexican migrants. Demography 44(4), 849–863 (2007)
Backstrom, L., Kleinberg, J.: Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties: a network analysis of relationship status on facebook, pp. 831–841. ACM Press (2014)
Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509 (1999)
Boguñá, M., Pastor-Satorras, R.: Class of correlated random networks with hidden variables, 68(3), 036112, September 2003
Boguñá, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Cut-offs and finite size effects in scale-free networks. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter 38(2), 205–209 (2004)
Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks. PloS One 5(9), e12948 (2010)
Clauset, A., Moore, C.: Accuracy and Scaling Phenomena in Internet Mapping (October 2004). eprint arXiv:cond-mat/0410059
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., Newman, M.E.: Power-law distributions in empirical data (2007). Arxiv preprint arXiv:0706.1062
Feld, S.L.: Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do. American Journal of Sociology 96(6), 1464–1477 (1991)
Hodas, N.O., Kooti, F., Lerman, K.: Friendship Paradox Redux: Your Friends Are More Interesting Than You. ICWSM 13, 8–10 (2013)
Kleinberg, J.: Complex networks and decentralized search algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM), vol. 3, pp. 1019–1044 (2006)
Kooti, F., Hodas, N.O., Lerman, K.: Network Weirdness: Exploring the Origins of Network Paradoxes. CoRR abs/1403.7242 (2014)
Leskovec, J., Faloutsos, C.: Sampling from large graphs. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 631–636. ACM (2006)
Leskovec, J., Krevl, A.: SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection (June 2014). http://snap.stanford.edu/data
Leskovec, J., Mcauley, J.J.: Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 539–547 (2012)
Milgram, S.: The small world problem. Psychology Today 2(1), 60–67 (1967)
Newman, M.E.: Mixing patterns in networks, 67(2), 026126, February 2003
Newman, M.E.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2), 167–256 (2003)
Newman, M.E.: Ego-centered networks and the ripple effect. Social Networks 25(1), 83–95 (2003)
Ravasz, E., Barabási, A.L.: Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Physical Review E 67(2), February 2003
Serrano, M.A., Boguná, M.: Tuning clustering in random networks with arbitrary degree distributions. Physical Review E 72(3), 036133 (2005)
Ugander, J., Backstrom, L., Kleinberg, J.: Subgraph Frequencies: Mapping the Empirical and Extremal Geography of Large Graph Collections. ArXiv e-prints, April 2013
Vázquez, A., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Large-scale topological and dynamical properties of the Internet. Physical Review E 65(6), 066130 (2002)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)
Zachary, W.W.: An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research 33(4), 452–473 (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gupta, S., Yan, X., Lerman, K. (2015). Structural Properties of Ego Networks. In: Agarwal, N., Xu, K., Osgood, N. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. SBP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16268-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)