Abstract
Self-management is recognized as a fundamental part of health care. This chapter provides an overview of Stanford’s suite of chronic disease self-management education (CDSME) programs with an emphasis on the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). Several issues are addressed including (1) the philosophy behind CDSMP and the core elements designed to help patients deal with their chronic conditions; (2) the range of appropriate delivery settings; (3) patient targets for maximal benefit; (4) recommended metrics and demonstrated outcomes in terms of meeting the triple aims of better health, better health care, and better value; (5) strategies for maintaining fidelity and promoting scalability; (6) integration with current health care technologies (e.g., electronic medical records); and (7) applicability to current health care policies (e.g., the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). Offering an excellent model for geriatric practice, the Stanford suite of CDSME has countless potential to help older patients manage their comorbidities. It can also serve as an important bridge between community and clinical care approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
National Prevention Council. National Prevention Strategy. In: Services US Department of Health and Human Services, editor. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Surgeon General; 2011.
Brady T, Murphy L, Beauchesne D, Bhalakia A, Chervin D, Daniels B, et al. sorting through the evidence for the arthritis self-management program and the chronic disease self-management program: Executive Summary of ASMP/CDSMP meta-analysis. 2011.
National Council on Aging. Title III-D highest tier evidence-based health promotion/disease prevention programs. 2014.
Ory MG, Smith ML, Patton K, Lorig K, Zenker W, Whitelaw N. Self-management at the tipping point: reaching 100,000 Americans with evidence-based programs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(5):821–3.
Kulinski K, Boutaugh M, Smith ML, Ory MG, Lorig K. Setting the stage: measure selection, coordination, and data collection for a national self-management initiative. Frontiers in Public Health. 2015. In-press.
Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BWJ, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14.
Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, William Brown BJ, Bandura A, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1217–23.
Stanford Patient Education Research Center. Organizations Licensed to Offer the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). 2014.
Smith M, Ory, MG, Ahn, S, Kulinski, K, Jiang L, Lorig, K. National Dissemination of Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) Programs: an incremental examination of delivery characteristics. Frontiers in Public Health Education and Promotion. 2015. In-press.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ARRA - Communities Putting Prevention to Work: Chronic Disease Self-Management Program, vol. 93. Washington, DC; 2009. p. 725.
Lorig K. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions : self-management of heart disease, arthritis, diabetes, depression, asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, and other physical and mental health conditions. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Bull Pub. Co.; 2012. vii, 343 p. p.
Lee W-C, Dooley KE, Ory MG, Sumaya CV. Meeting the geriatric workforce shortage for long-term care: opinions from the field. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2013;34(4):354–71.
Towne SD Jr, Smith ML, Ahn S, Ory MG. The reach of chronic disease self-management education programs to rural populations. Frontiers in Public Health: Public Health Education and Promotion. 2:172. 2015. In-press.
Lorig K, Ritter PL, Pifer C, Werner P. Effectiveness of the chronic disease self-management program for persons with a serious mental illness: a translation study. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50(1):96–103.
Ory M, Ahn S, Jiang L, Smith M, Ritter P, Whitelaw N, et al. Successes of a national study of the chronic disease self-management program: meeting the triple aim of health care reform. Med Care. 2013;51(11):992–8.
Ory M, Smith ML. Evidence-based programming for older adults. Frontiers in Public Health Education and Promotion. 2015. In-press.
Ory MG, Smith ML, Ahn S, Jiang L, Lorig K, Whitelaw N. National study of chronic disease self-management: age comparison of outcome findings. Health Educ Behav. 2014;41(1 Suppl):34S–42.
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):248–87.
Mowbray CT, Holter MC, Teague GB, Bybee D. Fidelity criteria: development, measurement, and validation. Am J Eval. 2003;24(3):315–40.
Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71(s1):S52–63.
Frank JC, Coviak CP, Healy TC, Belza B, Casado BL. Addressing fidelity in evidence-based health promotion programs for older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2008;27(1):4–33.
National Council on Aging. Advantages of Evidence-Based Programs [cited 2014 October 10]. http://www.ncoa.org/improve-health/center-for-healthy-aging/advantages-of-evidence-based.html.
Stanford Patient Education Research Center. Program Fidelity Manual: Stanford Self-Management Programs 2012 Update. 2012.
Glasgow RE, Magid DJ, Beck A, Ritzwoller D, Estabrooks PA. Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Med Care. 2005;43(6):551–7.
Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–69.
Ahn S, Basu R, Smith M, Jiang L, Lorig K, Whitelaw N, et al. The impact of chronic disease self-management programs: healthcare savings through a community-based intervention. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1141.
National Council on Aging. Evidence-based health promotion programs for older adults: key factors and strategies contributing to program sustainability. 2012.
National Council on Aging. Creating a business plan for evidence-based health promotion programs.
Kuperman GJ. Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(5):678–82.
Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):549–55.
Brailer DJ. Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-19-W5-21.
Stewart BA, Fernandes S, Rodriguez-Huertas E, Landzberg M. A preliminary look at duplicate testing associated with lack of electronic health record interoperability for transferred patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(3):341–4.
Hamilton B. Evaluation design of the business case of health information technology in long-term care: project summary. In: Services US Department of Health and Human Services, editor. Washington, DC; 2005.
Branger PJ, van’t Hooft A, van der Wouden JC, Moorman PW, van Bemmel JH. Shared care for diabetes: supporting communication between primary and secondary care. Int J Med Inform. 1999;53(2–3):133–42.
Barretto SA, Warren J, Goodchild A, Bird L, Heard S, Stumptner M. Linking guidelines to electronic health record design for improved chronic disease management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:66–70.
National Council on Aging AoA. Working with State Medicaid Agencies. In: National Council on Aging, http://www.ncoa.org/improve-health/center-for-healthy-aging/content-library/NCOA-AoA-Flyer-State-Medicaid-1.pdf.
Anderson G. Chronic care: making the case for ongoing care. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2010. p. 43.
Towne SD Jr, Smith ML, Ahn S, Belza B, Altpeter M, Kulinski KP, Ory MG. Delivering multiple evidence-based programs to at-risk seniors. Frontiers in Public Health: Public Health Education and Promotion 2015. In-press.
Wilson M, Smith ML. Putting CDSMP to work: implementation of the live healthy, Work Healthy Program. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HL122330.
Zuckerman S. What are the provisions in the new law for containing costs and how effective will they be? Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2010. p. 5.
National Council on Aging Self-Management Alliance. Developing a Value Proposition for Self-Management Washington, DC [cited 2014 October 1]. http://selfmanagementalliance.org/why-self-management/value-proposition/#.VDV1ivldVkl (2014).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge partial support from the South, West, and Central Consortium: Geriatric Education Center of Texas, Grant #99-500984. We thank Jessica Smarr and Rachel Coughlin for their editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ory, M.G., Ahn, S., Towne, S.D., Smith, M.L. (2015). Chronic Disease Self-Management Education: Program Success and Future Directions. In: Malone, M., Capezuti, E., Palmer, R. (eds) Geriatrics Models of Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16068-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16068-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16067-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16068-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)