Skip to main content

Modal Satisfiability via SMT Solving

  • Chapter
Software, Services, and Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8950))

Abstract

Modal logics extend classical propositional logic, and they are robustly decidable. Whereas most existing decision procedures for modal logics are based on tableau constructions, we propose a framework for obtaining decision procedures by adding instantiation rules to standard SAT and SMT solvers. Soundness, completeness, and termination of the procedures can be proved in a uniform and elementary way for the basic modal logic and some extensions.

This work was partly supported by grants ANPCyT-PICT-2008-306, ANPCyT-PICT-2010-688, ANPCyT-PICT-2012-712, the FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IRSES Project “Mobility between Europe and Argentina applying Logics to Systems” (MEALS), the project ANR-13-IS02-0001 of the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, the STIC AmSud MISMT, and the Laboratoire International Associé “INFINIS”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andréka, H., van Benthem, J., Németi, I.: Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 217–274 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Areces, C., ten Cate, B.: Hybrid logics. In: Blackburn, P., Wolter, F., van Benthem, J. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logics, pp. 821–868. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett, C., Sebastiani, R., Seshia, S.A., Tinelli, C.: Satisfiability modulo theories. In: Biere, A., Heule, M.J.H., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185, ch. 26, pp. 825–885. IOS Press (February 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer, F.L., Wirsing, M.: Elementare Aussagenlogik. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolander, T., Blackburn, P.: Termination for hybrid tableaus. Journal of Logic and Computation 17(3), 517–554 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Börger, E., Grädel, E., Gurevich, Y.: The Classical Decision Problem. Springer, Berlin (1997) With an appendix by C. Allauzen, B. Durand

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandra, A., Merlin, P.: Optimal implementation of conjunctive queries in relational databases. In: Proc. 9th ACM Symp. Theory of Computing, pp. 77–90 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Church, A.: A note on the Entscheidungsproblem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 1, 40–41 (1936)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganzinger, H., Hustadt, U., Meyer, C., Schmidt, R.A.: A resolution-based decision procedure for extensions of K4. In: Zakharyaschev, M., Segerberg, K., de Rijke, M., Wansing, H. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, pp. 225–246. CSLI Publications (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giunchiglia, F., Sebastiani, R.: Building decision procedures for modal logics from propositional decision procedures: The case study of modal K(m). Information and Computation 162(1-2), 158–178 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Goranko, V., Passy, S.: Using the universal modality: Gains and questions. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(1), 5–30 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Grädel, E.: Why are modal logics so robustly decidable? Bulletin EATCS 68, 90–103 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Grädel, E., Kolaitis, P., Vardi, M.: On the decision problem for two-variable first-order logic. Bulletin of Symbolc Logic 3, 53–69 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Grädel, E., Otto, M., Rosen, E.: Two-variable logic with counting is decidable. In: Proc. 12th Ann. IEEE Symp. Logic in Computer Science (LICS 1997), pp. 306–317. IEEE Comp. Soc. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hustadt, U., de Nivelle, H., Schmidt, R.A.: Resolution-based methods for modal logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8(3), 265–292 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Löwenheim, L.: Über Möglichkeiten im Relativkalkül. Mathematische Annalen 76, 447–470 (1915)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Tinelli, C.: Solving SAT and SAT Modulo Theories: From an abstract Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland procedure to DPLL(T). J. ACM 53(6), 937–977 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohlbach, H.J., Schmidt, R.A.: Functional translation and second-order frame properties of modal logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 7(5), 581–603 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Pacholsky, L., Szwast, W., Tendera, L.: Complexity of two-variable logic with counting. In: Proc. 12th Ann. IEEE Symp. Logic in Computer Science (LICS 1997), pp. 318–327 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt, R.A., Hustadt, U.: First-order resolution methods for modal logics. In: Voronkov, A., Weidenbach, C. (eds.) Programming Logics. LNCS, vol. 7797, pp. 345–391. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt, R.A., Tishkovsky, D.: Using tableau to decide description logics with full role negation and identity. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 15(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scott, D.: A decision method for validity of sentences in two variables. Journal of Symbolic Logic 27(377), 74 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sebastiani, R., Tacchella, A.: SAT techniques for modal and description logics. In: Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185, pp. 781–824. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Turing, A.: On computable numbers, with an application to the ‘Entscheidungsproblem’. Proc. London Mathematical Society 2nd. series 42, 230–265 (1937)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Vardi, M.: Why is modal logic so robustly decidable? In: DIMACS Ser. Disc. Math. Theoret. Comp. Sci., vol. 31, pp. 149–184. AMS (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Areces, C., Fontaine, P., Merz, S. (2015). Modal Satisfiability via SMT Solving. In: De Nicola, R., Hennicker, R. (eds) Software, Services, and Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8950. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15544-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15545-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics