Skip to main content

Scanline Sampling Techniques for Rock Engineering Surveys: Insights from Intrinsic Geologic Variability and Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 6

Abstract

Discontinuity surveys are based on collecting rock data from fieldwork and are an essential component of rock-mass quality estimation in rock engineering. Strength, deformability and permeability characteristics of a rock-mass are strongly influenced by its discontinuities. Scanline surveys are a reliably technique in which a line is drawn over an outcropped rock surface and all the discontinuities intersecting it are measured and described. The discontinuity geometry for a rock-mass is characterised by the number of discontinuity sets, mean density and the distributions for location, orientation, size and spacing/fracture intercept. Rock site investigation deals with several key elements that need to be addressed, namely the information required to characterise the rock system and the intrinsic uncertainty associated with this information. This way, quantifying the information content of the on-site measurements and creation a database is vital to be used for decision making processes and risk assessment on rock engineering design projects. In addition, a clear geology framework plays a key-role to support the investigation of all rock engineering projects. Nevertheless, the intrinsic variability of geological, petrophysical and geotechnical properties must be quantified for reliability-based design and to decrease the geological uncertainty. All geologists and engineers’ practitioners must have the aim to contribute to the correct study of the ground behaviour of soil and rock, their applications in sustainable design with nature and environment and to satisfy the society’s needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton N (2006) Rock quality, seismic velocity, attenuation and anisotropy. Taylor & Francis, London, 729 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2012) From empiricism, through theory, to problem solving in rock engineering: a shortened version of the 6th Müller Lecture. ISRM News J 14:60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. Interscience, Wiley, New York, 272 p

    Google Scholar 

  • CFCFF [Committee on Fracture Characterization and Fluid Flow] (1996). Rock fractures and fluid flow: contemporary understanding and applications. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 568 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminé HI, Afonso MJ, Silva RS, Moreira PF, Teixeira J, Trigo JF, Monteiro R, Fernandes P, Pizarro S (2010) Geotechnical factors affecting rock slope stability in Gaia riverside (NW Portugal). In: Williams A et al (eds) Proceedings 11th Congress, IAEG. CRC Press, Auckland, pp 2729–2736

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminé HI, Afonso MJ, Teixeira J, Ramos L, Fonseca L, Pinheiro R, Galiza AC (2013) Using engineering geosciences mapping and GIS-based tools on georesources management: lessons learned from rock quarrying. Eur Geol Mag J Eur Fed Geol 36:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha AP, Muralha J (1990) Scale effects in the mechanical behaviour of joints and rock masses. Memória 763. LNEC, Lisbon 44 p

    Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas MH (2009) Geology: its principles, practice and potential for geotechnics. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 42:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates W (1997) The hydro-potential (HP) value: a rock classification technique for evaluation of the groundwater potential in bedrock. Environ Eng Geosci 3(2):251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Haneberg WC (2009) Improved optimization and visualization of drilling directions for rock mass discontinuity characterization. Environ Eng Geosci 15(2):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1999) Putting numbers to geology: an engineer’s viewpoint. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 32(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (2007) Practical rock engineering. Hoek’s Corner, RocScience, p 342

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carter TG, Diederichs MS (2013) Quantification of the geological strength index chart. In: Proceedings geomechanics symposium 47th US rock mechanics, San Francisco, CA, ARMA 13-672, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Cosgrove JW (1997) Integrated structural geology and engineering rock mechanics approach to site characterization. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 34(3/4):136.1–136.15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Priest SD (1983) Discontinuity frequency in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 20:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM [International Society for Rock Mechanics] (1981) Basic geotechnical description of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 18:85–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaton J (2013) Engineering geology: fundamental input or random variable? In: Withiam JL, Phoon K-K Hussein M (eds) Foundation Engineering in the face of uncertainty: honoring Fred H. Kulhawy. ASCE. GSP 229. pp 232–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Latham JP (1999) Developments in the assessment of in situ block size distributions of rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32(1):29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauldon M, Dunne WM, Rohrbaugh MB Jr (2001) Circular scanlines and circular windows: new tools for characterizing the geometry of fracture traces. J Struct Geol 23(2–3):247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoccola DF, Millar DL, Hudson JA (1997) Information, uncertainty and decision making in site investigation for rock engineering. Geotech Geol Eng 15:145–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Park HJ, West TR (2002) Sampling bias of discontinuity orientation caused by linear sampling technique. Eng Geol 66(1–2):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock DC (2006) Predicting variability in joint frequencies from boreholes. J Struct Geol 28(2):353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pells PJN (2008) What happened to the mechanics in rock mechanics and the geology in engineering geology. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 108:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro R, Ramos L, Teixeira J, Afonso MJ, Chaminé HI (2014) MGC–RocDesign|CALC: a geomechanical calculator tool for rock design. In: Alejano LR, Perucho A, Olalla C, Jiménez R. (eds) Proceedings of Eurock2014, Rock Engineering and Rock Mechanics: Structures in and on Rock Masses (ISRM European Regional Symposium, Vigo, Spain). CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, London. pp. 655−660. (on pen-drive insert, ISRM Paper CH100)

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD (1993) Discontinuity analysis for rock engineering. Chapman and Hall, London 473 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD (2004) Determination of discontinuity size distributions from scanline data. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37(5):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD, Hudson JA (1981) Estimation of discontinuity spacing and trace length using scanline surveys. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abs 18(3):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbaugh MB Jr, Dunne WM, Mauldon M (2002) Estimating fracture trace intensity, density, and mean length using circular scan lines and windows. AAPG Bull 86(12):2089–2104

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley TF, Tikoff B, Ormand C, Manduca C (2013) Structural geology practice and learning, from the perspective of cognitive science. J Struct Geol 54:72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JV (2004) Determining the size and shape of blocks from linear sampling for geotechnical rock mass classification and assessment. J Struct Geol 26(6–7):1317–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi RD (1965) Sources of errors in joint surveys. Géotechnique 15:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Kulatilake PHSW, Tang H-M (2011) Comparison of rock discontinuity mean trace length and density estimation methods using discontinuity data from an outcrop in Wenchuan area, China. Comput Geotech 38(2):258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is under the framework of the Labcarga-IPP-ISEP|PADInv’2007/08 and Centre GeoBioTec|UA (PEst-C/CTE/UI4035/2014). RP was supported partially by LGMC|ISEP Centre. We acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments that helped to improve the clarity of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helder I. Chaminé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chaminé, H.I., Afonso, M.J., Ramos, L., Pinheiro, R. (2015). Scanline Sampling Techniques for Rock Engineering Surveys: Insights from Intrinsic Geologic Variability and Uncertainty. In: Lollino, G., et al. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09060-3_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics