Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

International Corporate Sustainability Barometer: Introduction and Structure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 31))

  • 1336 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter briefly summarises the development of the debate on corporate sustainability in academia and practice since the 1960s. Building on this synopsis, the edited volume is positioned within the contemporary discussions on sustainability management.

Furthermore, the chapter introduces the conceptual structure of the book chapters, the ‘Triple I’ approach, which is used to present the findings from each country in a consistent manner. The ‘Triple I’ approach constitutes a comprehensive scheme for analysing corporate sustainability, as it focuses on the companies’ intention to pursue sustainability management (i.e. motivation; issues), the integration of sustainability in the organisation (i.e. connecting sustainability to the core business; involving corporate functions; using drivers of business cases for sustainability) and the actual implementation of sustainability management measures (i.e. stakeholder management; sustainability management tools and standards; measurements).

Likewise, the chapter sets up a framework for comparing the international results, which allows positioning each country within the international context.

Lastly, the reader is provided with an overview of the edited volumes chapters and their key contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babiak K, Trendafilova S (2011) CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26(3):197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manag J 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black LD, Härtel CEJ (2004) The five capabilities of socially responsible companies. J Public Aff 4(2):125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Buchholtz AK (2006) Business & society: ethics and stakeholder management, 6th edn. Mason, South-Western

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility. A review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlev-Simonsen CD, Midttun A (2011) What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy D, Griffiths A, Benn S (2007) Organizational change for corporate sustainability. A guide for leaders and change agents of the future, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ (2008) Making sustainability work. Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ, Roy M-J (2003) Making the business case for sustainability: linking social and environmental actions to financial performance. J Corp Citizen 9:79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2010) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2012) G3 guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/reporting-framework-overview/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 7 Jul 2013

  • Haanaes K, Reeves M, von Streng Velken I, Audretsch M, Kiron D, Kruschwitz N (2012) Sustainability nears a tipping point, MIT Sloan Management Review. Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Boston Consulting Group, North Hollywood

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EG, Grosse-Dunker F, Reichwald R (2009) Sustainability innovation cube – a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int J Innov Manag 13(4):683–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harting T, Harmeling SS, Venkataraman S (2006) Innovative stakeholder relations. When ethics pays (and when it doesn’t). Bus Ethics Q 16(1):43–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman AJ (2001) Linking organizational and field-level analyses: the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organ Environ 14(2):133–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron D, Kruschwitz N, Haanaes K, Reeves M, Goh E (2013) The innovation bottom line. How companies that see sustainability as both a necessity and an opportunity, and change their business models in response, are finding success. Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Boston Consulting Group, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Krick T, Forstater M, Monaghan P, Sillanpää M (2005) Stakeholder engagement manual, vol 2, The practitioner’s handbook on stakeholder engagement. AccountAbility, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauring J, Thomsen C (2009) Collective ideals and practices in sustainable development: managing corporate identity. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 16(1):38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Benn S, Dunphy D (2007) Towards a model of governance for sustainability. In: Benn S, Dunphy D (eds) Corporate governance and sustainability: challenges for theory and practice. Routledge, London, pp 94–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore SB, Manring SL (2009) Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. J Clean Prod 17(2):276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2008) Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel CP, Harrington SJ (2000) The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. J Bus Ethics 25(4):313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S (2011) Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success. Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Soc Econ 33(1):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2005) Corporate sustainability. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 185–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F (2012) The “business case for sustainability” concept: a short introduction. Centre for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Herzig C, Kleiber C, Müller J (2002) Sustainability management in business enterprises, concepts and instruments for sustainable organisation development. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)/Federation of German Industries (BDI), Bonn/Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen EG (2012) Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 6(2):95–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Harms D, Hörisch J, Windolph SE, Burritt R, Carter A, Truran S, Crutzen N, Ben-Rhouma A, Csutora M, Tabi A, Kokubu K, Kitada H, Haider MB, Kim J-D, Lee K-H, Moneva JM, Ortas E, Álvarez-Etxeberria I, Daub C-H, Schmidt J, Herzig C, Morelli J (2013) International corporate sustainability barometer: a comparative study of 11 countries. Centre for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Harms D, Windolph SE, Hörisch J (2014) Involving corporate functions: who contributes to sustainable development? Sustainability 6(5):3064–3085

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2006) Managing the business case for sustainability. The integration of social, environmental and economic performance. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):936–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P, Hart S (1995) Creating sustainable corporations. Bus Strateg Environ 4(3):154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik M, Kanashiro P (2013) Toward a theory of sustainability management: uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organ Environ 26(1):7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger U (ed) (2004) The business of sustainability: building industry cases for corporate sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development 1992. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company-level measurement approach for CSR. J Environ Manag 26(4):247–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Windolph SE, Harms D, Schaltegger S (2013) Motivations for corporate sustainability management: contrasting survey results and implementation. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag (online first)

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2002) The business case for sustainable development: making a difference towards the Earth Summit 2002 and beyond. Corp Environ Strateg 9(3):226–235

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Dorli Harms, Jacob Hörisch, Stefan Schaltegger & Sarah Elena Windolph

Authors
  1. Dorli Harms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob Hörisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Schaltegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah Elena Windolph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorli Harms .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Stefan Schaltegger

  2. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Sarah Elena Windolph

  3. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Dorli Harms

  4. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Jacob Hörisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harms, D., Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S., Windolph, S.E. (2014). International Corporate Sustainability Barometer: Introduction and Structure. In: Schaltegger, S., Windolph, S., Harms, D., Hörisch, J. (eds) Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics