Skip to main content

Conversation Analytic Approaches to Language and Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Research Methods in Language and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter documents the impact of conversation analysis (CA) as a research method on language education. Beginning with the earlier crossover between CA and applied linguistics on the campus of UCLA, it proceeds to sketch how conversation analytic findings have enriched our understandings of the nature of interactional competence, the complexity of pedagogical practices, and finally, the very conceptualization of learning and how that learning is accomplished. It also paints in broad strokes the current trends of CA work on language education and highlights such challenges as translating CA insights into the classroom, illuminating teacher expertise, and cultivating a broader view of learning. The chapter concludes by delineating some future directions where some of these challenges may be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barraja-Rohan, A. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D. (2005). Vowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversation. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 214–234). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, A. (2009). Doing not being a foreign language learner: English as a lingua franca in the workplace and (some) implications for SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 47, 127–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K., & Smotrova, T. (2013). Teacher self-talk: Interactional resource for managing instruction and eliciting empathy. Journal of Pragmatics, 47, 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, E. (2013). Stability and change in one adult’s second language English negation. Language Learning, 63(3), 463–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J. (2008). Social practices for language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, Y. (2006). Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huth, T., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research, 10, 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2011). Research on second language teacher education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (2007). Handling sequentially inapposite responses. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social interaction (pp. 22–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2012). Practices for initial recognitional reference and learning opportunities in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 709–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, S. (2014). The nature of multiple responses to teachers’ questions. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshik, I. (2010). Questions that convey information in teacher-student conferences. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), ‘Why do you ask?’: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 159–186). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-A. (2008). Yes-no questions in the third-turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-A. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-and-interaction. Text and Talk, 30(4), 402–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-A. (2013). Descriptions of second language interaction: Toward descriptive adequacy. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 853–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markee, N. (2005). The organization of off-task talk in second language classrooms. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 197–213). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 135–162). Honolulu: University of Hawaii/National Foreign Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. T. (2012). Social interaction and competence development: Learning the structural organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. (2014). The roles of third-turn repeats in two L2 classroom interactional contexts. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 105–127). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reddington, E., & Waring, H. Z. (2015). Understanding the sequential resources for doing humor in the language classroom. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, T., & Liebscher, G. (2012). Positioning the expert: Word searches, expertise, and learning opportunities in peer interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K. (2006). Being the teacher: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (1980). The negotiation for meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 138–153). Rowley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. (2008). Learning to talk the talk: Conversation analysis as a tool for induction of trainee teachers. In S. Garton & K. Richards (Eds.), Professional discourse encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in teaching (pp. 42–57). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sert, O. (2013). ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, H. Z. (2013a). ‘How was your weekend?’: Developing the interactional competence in managing routine inquiries. Language Awareness, 22(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, H. Z. (2013b). Managing competing voices in the language classroom. Discourse Processes, 50(5), 316–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. (2002). ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 40, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. (2013). A coming of age of conversation analysis and applied linguistics. In T. Greer, D. Tatsuki, & C. Roever (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 13, pp. 5–27). Honolulu: University of Hawaii/National Foreign Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hansun Zhang Waring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Waring, H.Z. (2016). Conversation Analytic Approaches to Language and Education. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_39-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_39-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02329-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics