Abstract
This chapter documents the impact of conversation analysis (CA) as a research method on language education. Beginning with the earlier crossover between CA and applied linguistics on the campus of UCLA, it proceeds to sketch how conversation analytic findings have enriched our understandings of the nature of interactional competence, the complexity of pedagogical practices, and finally, the very conceptualization of learning and how that learning is accomplished. It also paints in broad strokes the current trends of CA work on language education and highlights such challenges as translating CA insights into the classroom, illuminating teacher expertise, and cultivating a broader view of learning. The chapter concludes by delineating some future directions where some of these challenges may be addressed.
References
Barraja-Rohan, A. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479–507.
Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534–545.
Carroll, D. (2005). Vowel-marking as an interactional resource in Japanese novice ESL conversation. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 214–234). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Firth, A. (2009). Doing not being a foreign language learner: English as a lingua franca in the workplace and (some) implications for SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 47, 127–156.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300.
Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.
Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29–45.
Hall, J. K., & Smotrova, T. (2013). Teacher self-talk: Interactional resource for managing instruction and eliciting empathy. Journal of Pragmatics, 47, 75–92.
Hauser, E. (2013). Stability and change in one adult’s second language English negation. Language Learning, 63(3), 463–498.
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social practices for language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hosoda, Y. (2006). Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 25–50.
Huth, T., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research, 10, 53–79.
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2011). Research on second language teacher education. New York: Routledge.
Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (2007). Handling sequentially inapposite responses. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, L. Wei, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social interaction (pp. 22–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kim, Y. (2012). Practices for initial recognitional reference and learning opportunities in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 709–729.
Ko, S. (2014). The nature of multiple responses to teachers’ questions. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 48–62.
Koshik, I. (2010). Questions that convey information in teacher-student conferences. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), ‘Why do you ask?’: The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 159–186). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Y.-A. (2008). Yes-no questions in the third-turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 237–262.
Lee, Y.-A. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-and-interaction. Text and Talk, 30(4), 402–422.
Lee, Y.-A. (2013). Descriptions of second language interaction: Toward descriptive adequacy. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 853–868.
Markee, N. (2005). The organization of off-task talk in second language classrooms. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 197–213). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.
Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550.
Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 135–162). Honolulu: University of Hawaii/National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Nguyen, H. T. (2012). Social interaction and competence development: Learning the structural organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 127–142.
Park, Y. (2014). The roles of third-turn repeats in two L2 classroom interactional contexts. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 145–167.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 105–127). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reddington, E., & Waring, H. Z. (2015). Understanding the sequential resources for doing humor in the language classroom. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28(1), 1–23.
Reichert, T., & Liebscher, G. (2012). Positioning the expert: Word searches, expertise, and learning opportunities in peer interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 599–609.
Richards, K. (2006). Being the teacher: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 51–77.
Schwartz, J. (1980). The negotiation for meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 138–153). Rowley: Newbury House.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.
Seedhouse, P. (2008). Learning to talk the talk: Conversation analysis as a tool for induction of trainee teachers. In S. Garton & K. Richards (Eds.), Professional discourse encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in teaching (pp. 42–57). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sert, O. (2013). ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45, 13–28.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266.
Waring, H. Z. (2013a). ‘How was your weekend?’: Developing the interactional competence in managing routine inquiries. Language Awareness, 22(1), 1–16.
Waring, H. Z. (2013b). Managing competing voices in the language classroom. Discourse Processes, 50(5), 316–338.
Wong, J. (2002). ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 40, 37–60.
Wong, J. (2013). A coming of age of conversation analysis and applied linguistics. In T. Greer, D. Tatsuki, & C. Roever (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 13, pp. 5–27). Honolulu: University of Hawaii/National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Waring, H.Z. (2016). Conversation Analytic Approaches to Language and Education. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_39-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_39-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02329-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education