Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stakeholder Engagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Reporting

Abstract

One of the main purposes claimed for reporting is the provision of an account to a range of stakeholders regarding how managers have acted in relation to the social, environmental, economic and ethical responsibilities these managers and their corporation feel they have towards stakeholders. Engagement and dialogue initiatives, therefore, are increasingly recognised as crucial elements of this accountability process. Only through stakeholder engagement companies can develop knowledge of what stakeholders believe should be their economic, environmental, ethical and social responsibilities to discharge. This chapter addresses this important aspect of corporate life investigating the role of stakeholder engagement within the reporting process in general, and the Integrated Reporting in particular. After describing the main traits of stakeholder engagement as of the most recent development in the academic literature, this process is placed within the context of Integrated Reporting and various theoretical perspectives that have the potential to prove useful in the interpretation of stakeholder engagement and dialogue practices are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    AccountAbility is a global organisation that works with companies to help them facing the most critical challenges in corporate responsibility and sustainable development. One critical component of this practice consists in building effective approaches to stakeholder engagement (for more details regarding the AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard framework, see http://www.accountability.org).

References

  • ACCA (2004) UK awards for sustainability reporting 2004. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London

    Google Scholar 

  • AccountAbility (2007) Development as accountability. Accountability innovators in action. London. http://www.accountability.org. Accessed 23 Jun 2013

  • AccountAbility (2011) Stakeholder engagement standard–exposure draft. London. http://www.accountability.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2013

  • Accounting for Sustainability (2008) Connected reporting in practice. A consolidated case study. http://www.suatainabilityatwork.org.uk

  • Adams CA, McNicholas P (2007) Making a difference: sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Account Audit Account J 20:382–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyemang G, Awumbila M, O’Dwyer B (2009) A critical reflection on the use of focus groups as a research method: lessons from trying to hear the voices of NGO beneficiaries in Ghana. Soc Environ Account J 29:4–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archel P, Husillos J, Spence C (2011) The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Account Organ Soc 36:327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenas D, Lozano JM, Albareda L (2009) The role of NGOs in CSR: mutual perceptions among stakeholders. J Bus Ethics 88:175–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M (2010) Re-conceiving managerial capture. Account Audit Account J 23:847–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone E, Ranamagar N, Solomon JF (2013) A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non)engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting. Accounting Forum 37(3):163–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J, Thomson I (2007) Social and environmental accounting, auditing, and reporting: a potential source of organisational risk governance? Environ Plann C Govern Pol 25:38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J, Brown J, Frame B, Thomson I (2007) Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach. Account Audit Account J 20:356–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belal AR, Roberts RW (2010) Stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate social reporting in Bangladesh. J Bus Ethics 97:311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton SC, Kim RC, O’Gorman KD (2011) Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: a case study. J Bus Ethics 101(1):64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesso G, Kumar K (2009) Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: evidence from Italy and the US. Account Forum 33:162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J (2009) Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: taking pluralism seriously. Crit Perspect Account 20:313–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Dillard J (2013) Critical accounting and communicative action: on the limits of consensual deliberation. Crit Perspect Account 24:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui TLH (2010) The Vietnamese consumer perception on corporate social responsibility. J Int Bus Res 9:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell J, Cook J (2006) It’s good to talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engagement processes. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 15:154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell J, Cook J (2008) Stakeholder dialogue and organisational learning: changing relationships between companies and NGOs. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 17:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean M (2009) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C, Unerman J (2011) Financial accounting theory. Second European edition. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey C (2007) Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: a struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Account Audit Account J 20:423–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard J, Yuthas K (2013) Critical dialogics, agonistic pluralism, and accounting information systems. Int J Account Inf Syst 14:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elijido-Ten E, Kloot L, Clarkson P (2010) Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures: an exploratory study from a developing country. Account Audit Account J 23:1032–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1991) Governmentality. In: Foucault M, Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P (eds) The foucault effect: studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M, Senellart M, Ewald F, Fontana A (2007) Security, territory, population: lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman M, Jaggi B (eds) (2006) Environmental accounting: commitment or propaganda. JAI Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1996) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallhofer S, Haslam J, Monk E, Roberts C (2006) The emancipatory potential of online reporting: the case of counter accounting. Account Audit Account J 19:681–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R (1997) The practice of silent accounting. In: Zadek S, Pruzan PM, Evans R (eds) Building corporate accountability: emerging practices in social and ethical accounting, auditing, and reporting. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account Audit Account J 8:47–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood M (2007) Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. J Bus Ethics 74:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch A, Patelli L, Pedrini M, Schwartz C (2011) Different talks with different folks: a comparative survey of stakeholder dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. J Bus Ethics 100:381–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood AG, Unerman J, Fries J (eds) (2010) Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IIRC (2011) Towards integrated reporting. Communicating value in the 21st century. IIRC, New York. http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/IR-Discussion-Paper-2011_spreads.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2013

  • IIRC (2013) Consultation draft of the international < IR > framework. IIRC, New York. http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/Consultation-Draft/Consultation-Draft-of-the-InternationalIRFramework.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2013

  • Irwin J (2012) Paulo Freire’s philosophy of education origins, developments, impacts and legacies. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall C (2011) Analysing the sustainability discourse within the accounting community. British Accounting and Finance Association Annual Conference. Aston University, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2008) KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008. Amsterdam. http://www.kpmg.com/EU/en/Documents/KPMG_International_survey_Corporate_responsibility_Survey_Reporting_2008.pdf. Accessed 26 Jun 2013

  • KPMG (2011) KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Amsterdam. http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/2011-survey.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2013

  • KPMG (2012) Integrated reporting. performance insight through better business reporting. http://www.kpmg.com/integratedreporting. Accessed 10 Jul 2013

  • Kwok WCC, Sharp D (2005) Power and international accounting standard setting: evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Account Audit Account J 18:74–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manetti G (2011) The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, O’Leary T (1987) Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Account Organ Soc 12:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Rose N (1990) Governing economic life. Econ Soc 19:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Rose NS (2008) Governing the present: administering economic, social and personal life. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22:853–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M, Curtis A, Davidson P (2012) Can triple bottom line reporting become a cycle for “double loop” learning and radical change? Account Audit Account J 25:1048–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (2005) Is higher education ready for transformative learning? A question explored in the study of sustainability. J Transform Educ 3:76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu D, Warsame H, Pedwell K (1998) Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports. Account Organ Soc 23:265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B (2003) Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture. Account Audit Account J 16:523–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B, Owen D, Unerman J (2011) Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: the case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Account Organ Soc 36:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen DL, Swift T, Hunt K (2001) Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Account Forum 25:264–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowbottom N, Lymer A (2009) Exploring the use of online corporate sustainability information. Account Forum 33:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell SL, Thomson I (2009) Analysing the role of sustainable development indicators in accounting for and constructing a Sustainable Scotland. Account Forum 33:225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott SV, Orlikowski WJ (2012) Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector. Account Organ Soc 37:26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikka P (2006) The internet and possibilities for counter accounts: some reflections. Account Audit Account J 19:759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence LJ, Rinaldi L. Governmentality in accounting and accountability: a case study of embedding sustainability in a supply chain. Accounting, Organizations and Society. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson I, Bebbington J (2005) Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation. Crit Perspect Account 16:507–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte & Touche (2012) Integrated reporting. navigating your way to a truly integrated report. TOUCHE, D, Johannesburg. http://www.deloitte.com. Accessed 10 Jul 2013

  • Tsoi J (2010) Stakeholders’ perceptions and future scenarios to improve corporate social responsibility in Hong Kong and Mainland China. J Bus Ethics 91:391–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2005) The stakeholder engagement manual. Volume 1: the guide to practitioners’ perspectives on stakeholder engagement. http://www.uneptie.org. Accessed 5 Nov 2007

  • Unerman J (2007) Stakeholder engagement and dialogue. In: Unerman J, Bebbington J, O’Dwyer B (eds) Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Unerman J, Bennett M (2004) Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Account Organ Soc 29:685–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unerman J, Bebbington J, O’Dwyer B (eds) (2007) Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young (2012) Driving value by combining financial and non-financial information into a single, investor-grade document. http://www.ey.com. Accessed 10 Jul 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Centre for Research Into Sustainability (CRIS), Royal Holloway University of London, Egham Hill, UK

    Leonardo Rinaldi

Authors
  1. Leonardo Rinaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Rinaldi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Econ., National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

    Cristiano Busco

  2. Kellstadt Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Mark L. Frigo

  3. University of Siena, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

    Angelo Riccaboni

  4. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Paolo Quattrone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rinaldi, L. (2013). Stakeholder Engagement. In: Busco, C., Frigo, M., Riccaboni, A., Quattrone, P. (eds) Integrated Reporting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation