Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role and variability of response thresholds in the regulation of division of labor in insect societies

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Social Insects

Summary

In this chapter, the regulation of division of labor in social insect colonies is studied from the perspective of response thresholds. Response thresholds refer to likelihood of reacting to task-associated stimuli. Low-threshold individuals perform tasks at a lower level of stimulus than high-threshold individuals. Task performance reduces the level of task-associated stimuli. A model based on fixed response thresholds is described, its assumptions discussed, and some of its predictions are shown to be in agreement with empirical observations. This model can be modified to make thresholds variable, but experimental results are scarce to guide the design of a model with variable thresholds. It is suggested, however, that the response threshold framework can help us understand the regulation of division of labor in social insects from a unifying perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37: 637–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oster G, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keller L (ed) (1993) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeanne RL (1991) Polyethism. In: KG Ross, RW Matthews (eds): The social biology of wasps. Comstock, Cornell, Ithaca, NY, 389–425

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson GE (1987) Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labour based on hormonally regulated response thresholds. J Comp Physiol 160: 613–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Calabi P (1988) Behavioral flexibility in Hymenoptera: a re-examination of the concept of caste. In: JC Trager (ed): Advances in myrmecology. Brill Press, Leiden, 237–258

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson EO (1984) The relation between caste ratios and division of labor in the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formic-idae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16: 89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenoir A (1987) Factors determining polyethism in social insects. Experientia Suppl 54: 219–241

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon DM (1989) Dynamics of task-switching in harvester ants. Anim Behav 38: 194–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson EO (1983b) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). IV. Colony ontogeny of A. Cephalotes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14: 55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. West-Eberhard M-J (1981) Intragroup selection and the evolution of insect societies. In: RD Alexander, DW Tinkle (eds): Natural selection and social behaviour. Chiron Press, New York, 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon DM (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380: 121–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1992) Honeybee colony integration: worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 11726–11729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindauer M (1952) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Z Vergl Physiol 34: 299–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony’s nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24: 181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeanne RL (1996) Regulation of nest construction behaviour in Polybia occidentalis. Anim Behav 52: 473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson EO (1985) Between-caste aversion as a basis for division of labor in the ant Pheidole pubiventris (Hymenoptera: Form-icidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17: 35–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reeve HK, Gamboa GJ (1987) Queen regulation of worker foraging in paper wasps: a social feedback control system (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behaviour 102: 147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11: 287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1994) Social resilience in individual worker ants and its role in division of labour. Proc R Soc Eond B 256: 305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1995) Spatial relationships within the nests of the ant Eeptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour. Anim Behav 50: 121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1995) Division of labour in a crisis: task allocation during colony emigration in the ant Eeptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franks NR, Sendova-Franks AB (1992) Brood sorting by ants: distributing the workload over the work surface. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Passera L, Roncin E, Kaufmann B, Keller L (1996) Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition. Nature 379: 630–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (1988) Dense heterarchies and mass communications as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 65–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grassé P-P (1959) La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations inter-individuelles chez Bellicositermes Natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La théorie de la stigmergie: essai d’interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs”. Insect Soc 6: 41–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L (1996) Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1565–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Plowright RC, Plowright CMS (1988) Elitism in social insects: a positive feedback model. In: RL Jeanne (ed): Interindi-vidual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, 419–431

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chrétien L (1996) Organisation spatiale du matériel provenant de l’excavation du nid chez Messor barbarus et des cadavres d’ouvrières chez Lasius niger (Hymen-opterae: Formicidae). PhD Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson GE (1987) Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20: 329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Breed MD, Robinson GE, Page RE (1990) Division of labor during honey bee colony defense. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27: 395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Detrain C, Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L (1988) Polyéthisme dans le tracé et le suivi de la piste chez Pheidole pallidula (Formicidae). Actes Coll Insect Soc 4: 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  35. Detrain C, Pasteels JM (1991) Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). J Insect Behav 4: 157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Detrain C, Pasteels JM (1992) Caste polyethism and collective defense in the ant Pheidole pallidula: the outcome of quantitative differences in recruitment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wheeler DE, Nijhout HF (1981) Soldier determination in ants: new role for juvenile hormone. Science 213: 361–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schatz B (1997) Modalités de la recherche et de la récolte alimentaire chez la fourmi Ectatomma ruidum Roger: flexibilités individuelle et collective. PhD dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson EO (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). I. The overall pattern in A. sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7: 143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson EO (1983) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). III. Ergonomic resiliency in foraging by A. cephalotes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14: 47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lenoir A (1979) Le comportement alimentaire et la division du travail chez la fourmi Lasius niger. Bull Biol France and Belgique 113: 79–314

    Google Scholar 

  42. Calabi P (1986) Division of labor in the ant Pheidole dentata: the role of colony demography and behavioral flexibility. PhD dissertation, Boston University, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  43. Calabi P, Traniello JFA (1989) Behavioral flexibility in age castes of the ant Pheidole dentata. J Insect Behav 2: 663–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Carlin NF, Hölldobler B (1983) Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science 222: 1027–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 346–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tofts C (1993) Algorithms for task allocation in ants (a study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55: 891–918

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tofts C, Franks NR (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48: 470–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55: 75–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Calderone NW, Page RE (1996) Temporal polyethism and behavioural canalization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 51: 631–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Robinson GE, Page RE, Huang Z-Y (1994) Temporal polyethism in social insects is a developmental process. Anim Behav 48: 467–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Calderone NW, Page RE (1988) Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22: 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Calderone NW, Page RE (1991) The evolutionary genetics of division of labor in colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Amer Naturalist 138: 69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Frumhoff PC, Baker J (1988) A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee colonies. Nature 333: 358–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Page RE, Robinson GE (1991) The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. Adv. Insect Physiol 23: 117–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Robinson GE, Page RE (1988) Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honeybee colonies. Nature 333: 356–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Stuart RJ, Page RE (1991) Genetic component to division of labor among workers of a leptothoracine ant. Naturwissenchaften 78: 375–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Franks NR, Tofts CMN (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48: 470–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wheeler DE (1986) Developmental and physiological determinants of caste in social Hymenoptera: evolutionary implications. Amer Naturalist 128: 13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Jaisson P, Fresneau D, Lachaud J-P (1988) Individual traits of social behaviour in ants. In: RL Jeanne (ed): Inter individual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  60. Van der Blom J (1993) Individual differentiation in behaviour of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Soc 40: 345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Deneubourg J-L, Goss S, Pasteeis JM, Fresneau D, Lachaud JP (1987) Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (II): learning in foraging and division of labour. In: JM Pasteels, J-L Denubourg (eds) From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 54: 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  62. Theraulaz G, Goss S, Gervet J, Deneubourg J-L (1991) Task differentiation in Polistes wasp colonies: a model for self-organizing groups of robots. In: JA Meyer, SW Wilson (eds): From animals to animats. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 346–355

    Google Scholar 

  63. Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg J-L (1998) Threshold reinforcement and the regulation of division of labour in social insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bonabeau E, Theralauz G, Deneubourg JL (1998) Fixed response thresholds and the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Bull Math Biol 60: 753–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Eric Bonabeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guy Theraulaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Av. F.D. Roosevelt, CP.160/12, B-1050, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Claire Detrain , Jean Louis Deneubourg  & Jacques M. Pasteels ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G. (1999). Role and variability of response thresholds in the regulation of division of labor in insect societies. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation