Summary
Different species of voles (Microtus) live in different mating systems, with prairie and pine voles generally more social and more monogamous than montane and meadow voles. Mating systems are treated as epiphenomena, driven by the actions and adaptations of individual animals. The species differ with respect to morphology, development, male ejaculate capacity, copulatory behavior, parental behavior, and social contact-proneness. Natural selection appears to have acted on suites of traits of individuals and thereby produced contrasting mating systems in the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
Dewsbury, D. A. 1973. Copulatory behavior of montane voles (Microtus montanus). Behaviour, 44:186–202.
Dewsbury, D. A. 1976. Copulatory behavior of pine voles (Microtus pinetorum). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43:91–94.
Dewsbury, D. A. 1981a. An exercise in the prediction of monogamy in the field from laboratory data on 42 species of muroid rodents. Biologist, 63:138–162.
Dewsbury, D. A. 1981b. On the function of the multiple-intromission, multiple-ejaculation copulatory patterns of rodents. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18:221–223.
Dewsbury, D. A. 1988. The comparative psychology of monogamy. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 35:1–50.
Dewsbury, D. J., Baumgardner, R. L. Evans, and D. G. Webster. 1980. Sexual dimorphism for body mass in 13 taxa of muroid rodents under laboratory conditions. Journal of Mammalogy, 61:146–149.
Gerald, R. W., and D. M. Madison. 1983. Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pinetorum. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13:183–187.
Gaulin, S. J. C, and R. W. Fitz-Gerald. 1988. Home-range size as a predictor of mating systems in Microtus. Journal of Mammalogy, 69:311–319.
Getz, L. L. 1978. Speculation on social structure and population cycles of microtine rodents. Biologist, 60:134–147.
Getz, L. L., and J. E. Hofmann. 1986. Social organization in free-living prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18:275–282.
Gray, G. D., and D. A. Dewsbury. 1973. A quantitative description of copulatory behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 8:437–452.
Gray, G. D., 1975. A quantitative description of the copulatory behaviour of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Animal Behaviour, 23:261–267.
Harcourt, A. H., P. H. Harvey, S. G. Larson, and R. V. Short. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293:55–57.
Jannett, F. J., Jr. 1982. Nesting patterns of adult voles, Microtus montanus, in field populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 63:495–498.
Kenagy, G. J., and S. C. Trombulak. 1986. Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. Journal of Mammalogy, 67:1–22.
Kleiman, D. G. 1977. Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52:39–69.
Madison, D. M. 1980. An integrated view of the social biology of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Biologist, 62:20–33.
Madison, D. M., and W. J. McShea. 1987. Seasonal changes in reproductive tolerance, spacing, and social organization in meadow voles: A microtine model. American Zoologist, 27:899–908.
McGuire, B., and M. Novak. 1984. A comparison of maternal behaviour in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), prairie vole (M. ochrogaster) and pine vole (M. pinetorum). Animal Behaviour, 32:1132–1141.
McGuire, B., and Novak, M. 1986. Parental care and its relationship to social organization in the montane vole (Microtus montanus). Journal of Mammalogy, 67:305–311.
Parker, G. A 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. Pp. 1–60, in Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (R. L. Smith, ed.). Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, 687 pp.
Pierce, J. D., Jr., et al. 1990. Patterns of sperm allocation across successive ejaculates in four species of voles (Microtus). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 88:141–149.
Shapiro, L. E., M. E. Meyer, and D. A. Dewsbury. 1989. Affiliative behavior in voles: Effects of morphine, nalaxone, and cross-fostering. Physiology and Behavior, 46:719–723.
Storey, A. E., and D. T. Snow. 1987. Male identity and enclosure size affect paternal attendance of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behaviour, 35:411–419.
Wolff, J. O. 1985. Behavior. Pp. 340–372, in Biology of New World Microtus (R. H. Tamarin, ed.). American Society of Mammalogists, Special Publication, 8:1–893.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dewsbury, D.A. (1990). Individual Attributes Generate Contrasting Degrees of Sociality in Voles. In: Tamarin, R.H., Ostfeld, R.S., Pugh, S.R., Bujalska, G. (eds) Social Systems and Population Cycles in Voles. Advances in Life Sciences. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6416-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6416-9_1
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-2437-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-6416-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive