Skip to main content

Model-Independent Error Bound Estimation for Conformance Checking Approximation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 492))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 339 Accesses

Abstract

Conformance checking techniques quantify correspondence between a process’s execution and a reference process model using event data. Alignments, used for conformance statistics, are computationally expensive for complex models and large datasets. Recent studies show accurate approximations can be achieved by selecting subsets of model behavior. This paper presents a novel approach deriving error bounds for conformance checking approximation based on arbitrary activity sequences. The proposed approach allows for the selection of relevant subsets for improved accuracy. Experimental evaluations validate its effectiveness, demonstrating enhanced accuracy compared to traditional alignment methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    svn.win.tue.nl/repos/prom/Packages/LogFiltering.

References

  1. Carmona, J., van Dongen, B., Solti, A., Weidlich, M.: Conformance Checking. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99414-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Adriansyah, A., Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Alignment based precision checking. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 137–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: On the role of fitness, precision, generalization and simplicity in process discovery. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 305–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Fani Sani, M., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking approximation using subset selection and edit distance. In: Dustdar, S., Yu, E., Salinesi, C., Rieu, D., Pant, V. (eds.) CAiSE 2020. LNCS, vol. 12127, pp. 234–251. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. van Zelst, S.J., Bolt, A., Hassani, M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.: Online conformance checking: relating event streams to process models using prefix-alignments. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 8, 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer, M., van der Aa, H., Weidlich, M.: Sampling and approximation techniques for efficient process conformance checking. Inf. Syst. 104, 101666 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Awad, A., Raun, K., Weidlich, M.: Efficient approximate conformance checking using trie data structures. In: 3rd International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM), pp. 1–8 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fani Sani, M., Gonzalez, J.J.G., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Alignment approximator: a prom plug-in to approximate conformance statistics. In: Proceedings of the Best Dissertation Award, Doctoral Consortium, and Demonstration & Resources Forum at BPM 2023, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 102–106 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decomposing petri nets for process mining: a generic approach. Distrib. Parallel Databases 31(4), 471–507 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bauer, M., Senderovich, A., Gal, A., Grunske, L., Weidlich, M.: How much event data is enough? A statistical framework for process discovery. In: Krogstie, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10816, pp. 239–256. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fani Sani, M., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Improving the performance of process discovery algorithms by instance selection. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 17(3), 927–958 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taymouri, F., Carmona, J.: A recursive paradigm for aligning observed behavior of large structured process models. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 197–214. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Padró, L., Carmona, J.: Computation of alignments of business processes through relaxation labeling and local optimal search. Inf. Syst. 104 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fani Sani, M., Garza Gonzalez, J.J., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking approximation using simulation. In: 2nd International Conference on Process Mining, ICPM 2020, Padua, Italy, pp. 105–112. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Park, H., Jun, C.: A simple and fast algorithm for k-medoids clustering. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 3336–3341 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B., Günther, C.W., Rozinat, A., Verbeek, E., Weijters, T.: Prom: the process mining toolkit. BPM (Demos) 489(31) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering block-structured process models from event logs containing infrequent behaviour. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 66–78. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadreza Fani Sani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fani Sani, M., Kabierski, M., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2024). Model-Independent Error Bound Estimation for Conformance Checking Approximation. In: De Weerdt, J., Pufahl, L. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 492. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50974-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50974-2_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50973-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50974-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics