Abstract
This paper presents a systematic mapping study of NATO member states prominent in the cyber domain, and their interpretation of cyber terminology. NATO nations currently participate in a range of cyber exercises, but there is no unified conceptual framework for accepted cyberspace definitions to ensure interoperability. There is therefore a requirement for a common understanding of how member states define cyber operations.
This study seeks to determine if the doctrinal publications of NATO member states can answer the research question - How do NATO members define cyber operations?
The Systematic Mapping Study aims to provide a broad overview of the research area to provide evidence on the topic and its quantity.
60 national doctrinal publications were reviewed from 12 prominent NATO nations. Of these, ten defined cyber operations in a similar manner providing coherency in understanding the concepts involved. This provides a basis for successful cyber operations and exercises.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Doctrinal publications are considered as governmental, official publications concerning doctrines.
References
Arik, M., Venables, A., Ottis, R.: Planning cyberspace operations: exercise crossed swords case study. J. Inf. Warfare 21, 74 (2022)
CCDCOE, “Crossed Swords,” The NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (2023). [Online]. https://ccdcoe.org/exercises/crossed-swords/. Accessed 15 June 2023
Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. IEEE Softw. Newcastle (2007)
NATO, NATO member countries (2023). https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52044.htm. Accessed 21 June 2023
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government, “National Cyber Power Index 2020 (2020). https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/national-cyber-power-index-2020. Accessed 15 June 2023
U.S. Air Force, “Air Force Doctrine Publication 3–12 - Cyberspace Operations,” (2023). https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Doctrine-Publications/AFDP-3-12-Cyberspace-Ops/
I. H. D. C. Julia Voo, “National Cyber Power Index 2022,” Belfer Center, Cambridge (2022)
K. A. L. Kaska Julgeolekuasutuste roll küberjulgeoleku tagamisel ja seda mõjutavad suundumused rahvusvahelises õiguses 2020. https://juridica.ee/article.php?uri=2020_2_julgeolekuasutuste_roll_k_berjulgeoleku_tagamisel_ja_seda_m_jutavad_suundumused_rahvusvahelis
Andrew, E.O.: HUMAN COMPUTER SYMBIOSIS (2016). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.04066.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2023
Acknowledgments
Dr Adrian Nicholas Venables and Dr Rain Ottis from Taltech University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Arik, M. (2024). How Do NATO Members Define Cyber Operations?. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1957. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49212-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49212-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49211-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49212-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)