Skip to main content

Neuronal Fractal Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Fractal Geometry of the Brain

Part of the book series: Advances in Neurobiology ((NEUROBIOL,volume 36))

  • 268 Accesses

Abstract

Synapse formation is a unique biological phenomenon. The molecular biological perspective of this phenomenon is different from the fractal geometrical one. However, these perspectives are not mutually exclusive and supplement each other. The cornerstone of the first one is a chain of biochemical reactions with the Markov property, that is, a deterministic, conditional, memoryless process ordered in time and in space, in which the consecutive stages are determined by the expression of some regulatory proteins. The coordination of molecular and cellular events leading to synapse formation occurs in fractal time space, that is, the space that is not only the arena of events but also actively influences those events. This time space emerges owing to coupling of time and space through nonlinear dynamics. The process of synapse formation possesses fractal dynamics with non-Gaussian distribution of probability and a reduced number of molecular Markov chains ready for transfer of biologically relevant information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams H, Aminian M, Farnell E, Kirby M, Peterson C, Mirth J, Neville R, Shipman P, Shonkwiler C. A fractal dimension for measures via persistent homology. In: Baas N, Carlsson G, Quick G, Szymik M, Thaule M, editors. Topological data analysis. Abel symposia, vol. 15. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43408-3_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguayo LG, van Zundert B, Tapia JC, Carrasco MA, Alvarez FJ. Changes on the properties of glycine receptors during neuronal development. Brain Res Rev. 2004;47(1-3):33–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Briones TL, Klintsova AY, Greenough WT. Stability of synaptic plasticity in the adult rat visual cortex induced by complex environment exposure. Brain Res. 2004;1018(1):130–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bury LA, Sabo SL. Building a terminal: mechanisms of presynaptic development in the CNS. Neuroscientist. 2015 July 24. pii: 1073858415596131.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsson G. Topology and data. Bull Am Math Soc. 2009;46(2):255–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ethell IM, Ethell DW. Matrix metalloproteinases in brain development and remodeling: synaptic functions and targets. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85(13):2813–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman MR. Glial control of synaptogenesis. Cell. 2005;120(3):292–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerstein GL, Mandelbrot B. Random walk models for the spike activity of a single neuron. Biophys J. 1964;4:41–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Guan C, Chien-Ping K. Schwann cell-derived factors modulate synaptic activities at developing neuromuscular synapses. J Neurosci. 2007;27(25):6712–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu J, Zheng Y, Gao J. Long-range temporal correlations, multifractality, and the causal relation between neural inputs and movements. Front Neurol. 2013;4(158):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kacerovsky JB, Murai KK. Stargazing: monitoring subcellular dynamics of brain astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.007.

  12. Karperien A, Jelinek HF, Milosevic NT. Reviewing lacunarity analysis and classification of microglia in neuroscience. In: Waliszewski P, editor. Fractals and complexity. Wroclaw: Format; 2013. p. 50–5. ISBN 978-83-936598-0-7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Proepper C, Johannsen S, Liebau S, Dahl J, Vaida B, Bockmann J, Kreutz MR, Gundelfinger ED, Boeckers TM. Abelson interacting protein 1 (Abi-1) is essential for dendrite morphogenesis and synapse formation. EMBO J. 2007;26(5):1397–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:389–442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki S, Kiyosue K, Hazama S, Ogura A, Kashihara M, Hara T, Koshimizu H, Kojima M. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates cholesterol metabolism for synapse development. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6417–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Toni N, Teng EM, Bushong EA, Aimone JB, Zhao C, Consiglio A, van Praag H, Martone ME, Ellisman MH, Gage FH. Synapse formation on neurons born in the adult hippocampus. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(6):727–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ullian EM, Christopherson KS, Barres BA. Role for glia in synaptogenesis. Glia. 2004;47(3):209–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Waliszewski P, Konarski J. Neuronal differentiation and synapse formation occur in space and time with fractal dimension. Synapse. 2002;43(4):252–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Waliszewski P. A principle of fractal-stochastic dualism and Gompertzian dynamics of growth and self-organization. Biosystems. 2005;82(1):61–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waliszewski P, Konarski J. On time-space of nonlinear phenomena with Gompertzian dynamics. Biosystems. 2005;80:91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waliszewski P. A principle of fractal-stochastic dualism, couplings, complementarity and growth. Control Eng Appl Inform. 2009;11(4):45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng X, Sun M, Liu L, Chen F, Wei L, Xie W. Neurexin-1 is required for synapse formation and larvae associative learning in drosophila. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(13):2509–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Przemysław Waliszewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

If one assumes that the spatial variable x and the temporal variable t are coupled to each other in a linear manner into a single, complex spatiotemporal variable θ such that

$$ \theta =\mu x+t $$
(9.1)

then the Gompertz function, the function of probability distribution P(θ), the anharmonic potential U(θ), and the diffusion coefficient D are all related to each other through the one-dimensional differential operator (9.2). This operator contains the function of probability distribution [21]:

$$ -\frac{1}{D}\frac{\partial^2P\left(\theta \right)}{\partial {\theta}^2}+\frac{D}{4}P\left(\theta \right)+U\left(\theta \right)P\left(\theta \right)=0 $$
(9.2)

This linear coupling of variables can also be defined as a function with both spatial and temporal fractal dimensions. It is known from experimental data from the in vitro cellular system of P19/RAC 65 that the number of cells (or their volume) also changes in time t according to the Gompertzian function f(t) [19]. The volume of the spheroid V is given by the equation:

$$ V={V}_kF\left({t}_0\right){e}^{a\left(1-{e}^{- bt}\right)}={V}_kf\left({t}_0\right){at}^{b_t}={V}_0{at}^{b_t} $$
(9.3)

where Vk is the mean volume of a single cell, n stands for the number of cells in the spheroid, and the Gompertzian function can be fitted with the fractal function f(t= atb with extremely high accuracy; for a coefficient of the nonlinear regression R >> 0.95 for n ≥ 100 pairs of coordinates), a stands for the scaling coefficient, bt is the temporal fractal dimension, and t is scalar time.

The volume V of the spheroid can also be expressed as a function of the scalar geometrical variable x (i.e., the radius of a family of the concentric spheres covering the entire spheroid) by Eq. (9.4):

$$ V={a}_1{x}^{b_s} $$
(9.4)

where a1 stands for the scaling coefficient, bs is the spatial fractal dimension after scalar time t1, and x is the scalar, geometrical variable, which locates an effect in space.

Hence, we get Eq. (9.5):

$$ V={a}_1{x}^{b_{\textrm{s}}}={V}_0{at}^{b_t}={a}_0{x}^{b_{{\textrm{s}}_0}}{at}^{b_t} $$
(9.5)

where a, a0, and a1 stand for the scaling coefficients, bt is the temporal fractal dimension, bs0 and bs are the spatial fractal dimensions after time t0 and t, respectively, and x is the geometrical variable.

Finally, Eq. (9.6) relates space and time in which proliferation, differentiation, and synapse formation occur. This equation defines the geometrical variable x as a function of the scalar time t and both temporal and spatial fractal dimensions

$$ \ln x=\frac{1}{b_{\textrm{s}}-{b}_{{\textrm{s}}_0}}\ln \frac{a_0a}{a_1}+\frac{b_t}{b_{\textrm{s}}-{b}_{{\textrm{s}}_0}}\ln t $$
(9.6)

where t stands for scalar time, x is the geometrical variable, bs is the spatial fractal dimension, and bt is the temporal fractal dimension.

1.1 Entropy and Dynamics of Synapse Formation in Fractal Time Space

It is worth noticing that the assumed Markov model of molecular interactions within differentiating neurons implies at least three important consequences. First, the entropy (i.e., missing information) HM of the Markov chain of the coupled molecular reactions is always lower than the entropy of a set of random and independent biochemical reactions HR. Indeed, entropy is defined as the expected value of missing information Hp:

$$ {H}_{\textrm{P}}=H(X)=-\sum \limits_{j=1}^N{p}_j\log {p}_j $$
(9.7)

where p = (p1, p2,...pj), jε N, is the probability density function over a generic variable X, and if pj = 0, then Hp = 0 and log is a natural logarithm providing a unit of measure.

Hence, the conditional entropy H(Xk|Yk-1) of the Xk reaction stands for which conditional information is determined when the state Yk-1 = i, is given by the following equation:

$$ H\left({X}_k\left|{Y}_{k-1}\right.=i\right)=-\sum \limits_j{p}_{ij}\log {p}_{ij} $$
(9.8)

The conditional entropy of the Markov chain HC is given by (9.9):

$$ {H}_{\textrm{C}}=H\left({X}_k\left|{X}_{k-1}\right.\right)=-\sum \limits_i{p}_i\sum \limits_j{p}_{ij}\log {p}_{ij} $$
(9.9)

Finally, we get Eq. (9.10) for the n first steps of the Markov chain X1, X2,..., Xn from (9.7), (9.8), and (9.9), the principle of additivity of independent random events, and from the analog principle for the conditional probabilities, we get:

$$ \begin{aligned} {H}_{\textrm{M}}&=H\left({X}_1\right)+\sum \limits_{k=2}^{k=n}H\left\langle {X}_k|{X}_{k-1}\right\rangle =-\sum {p}_j\log {p}_j+\left(n-1\right){H}_{\textrm{C}}<{nH}_{\textrm{P}}\\ &=-\sum \limits_j{p}_j\log {p}_j={H}_{\textrm{R}} \end{aligned} $$
(9.10)

Second, the Gompertzian dynamics of molecular cellular growth can be normalized, i.e., the growth dynamics of various tissue systems can be described by a single normalized Gompertz function fN(t) (9.11). In fact, this normalized Gompertz function is both a dynamics function fN(t) and a probability function pN(t) (for details, see Waliszewski [19]).

$$ {f}_N(t)={e}^{-{e}^{\left(- bt\right)}}={p}_N(t) $$
(9.11)

Consider a coupling of probability function pN(t) and anti-probability function log pN(t), where r = b:

$$ \frac{dp_N(t)}{dt}=-{rp}_N(t)\log {p}_N(t) $$
(9.12)

This equation defines the relationship between entropy H(t) and the normalized Gompertzian dynamics of growth pN(t):

$$ {p}_N(t)=\int \frac{\partial {p}_N(t)}{\partial t} dt=-r\int {p}_N(t)\log {p}_N(t) dt= rH(t) $$
(9.13)

Finally, from (9.11) and (9.12), we get (9.14):

$$ H{(t)}_{\textrm{Gompertz}}=\frac{1}{b}{e}^{-{e}^{\left(- bt\right)}} $$
(9.14)

According to the Shannon theorem, of all the continuous distribution densities for which the standard deviation exists and is fixed, the Gaussian, (i.e., normal) distribution has the maximum value of entropy H:

$$ {H}_{\textrm{Gauss}}=-\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-\frac{t^2}{2{\sigma}^2}}}{\sqrt{2{\pi \sigma}^2}}\log \frac{e^{-\frac{t^2}{2{\sigma}^2}}}{\sqrt{2{\pi \sigma}^2}} dt=\frac{1}{2}\log \left(2\pi e{\sigma}^2\right) $$
(9.15)

In the case of growing supramolecular cellular system such as neurons, entropy or missing information H(t) is a function of time related to the dynamic function of growth in fractal space time. For b = 1, both the normalized Gompertz function (9.11) and the entropy function (9.14) overlap each other. However, b << 1 for the majority of cellular systems. The distribution of probability is in such cases is non-Gaussian.

Third, there is a relationship between the number of elements in the Markov chain and entropy. If Mp(n) stands for a number of Markov chains of length n with the total probability p, 0 < p < 1, then there exists the same limit for each probability p that equals entropy H:

$$ \underset{n\to \infty }{\lim}\frac{\log {M}_p(n)}{n}=H $$
(9.16)

If the total number of states of the supramolecular cellular system equals 2m, then the number of molecular reactions interconnected in the Markov chains of length n is 2nm. It is clear from (9.16) that only 2nH molecular Markov chains with probability 1-ε, ε > 0 will be involved in the transfer of biologically relevant information.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kołodziej, M., Waliszewski, P. (2024). Neuronal Fractal Dynamics. In: Di Ieva, A. (eds) The Fractal Geometry of the Brain. Advances in Neurobiology, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics