Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 497))

  • 180 Accesses

Abstract

Technology has revolutionized the education system. Many tools such as Learning Management Systems (LMS) were developed to enhance the learning process. With this new technology, teachers and universities can explore options otherwise difficult to implement. Keeping students engaged is one of the biggest challenges that educational institutions face. Students’ motivation, engagement, and performance can be affected by using LMS. Strategies like self-regulated learning, gamification, and real-time at-risk student detection can be more easily implemented. The analysis of the effects of LMS on learning is made in form of a systematic literature review (SLR). 33 studies published after 2017 were extracted for full-text analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hajar, M., Adil, J., Ali, Y.: Predicting factors affecting student’s performance in a learning management system. Indian J. Comp. Sci. Eng. 12(6), 1771–1779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21817/indjcse/2021/v12i6/211206015

  2. Oguguo, B.C.E., Nannim, F.A., Agah, J.J., Ugwuanyi, C.S., Ene, C.U., Nzeadibe, A.C.: Effect of learning management system on student’s performance in educational measurement and evaluation. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(2), 1471–1483 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10318-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verawati, N.N.S.P., Ernita, N., Prayogi, S.: Enhancing the reasoning performance of STEM students in modern physics courses using virtual simulation in the LMS platform. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 17(13), 267–277 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.31459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prabowo, H., Yuniarty, Y., Ikhsan, R. B. (2022). Student engagement mechanism of online learning: the effect of service quality on learning management system. Int. J. Inform. Visual. 6(3):681–687. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.3.1263

  5. Zhang, Y., Ghandour, A., Shestak, V.: Using learning analytics to predict students performance in moodle LMS. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 15(20), 102–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.15915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Avcı, Ü., Ergün, E.: Online students’ LMS activities and their effect on engagement, information literacy and academic performance. Interact. Learn. Environ. 30(1), 71–84 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ustun, A.B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F.G., Yilmaz, R.: Investigating the role of accepting learning management system on students’ engagement and sense of community in blended learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(4), 4751–4769 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10500-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginige, T.N.D.S., Vanderwall, S.T.: Effective online learning management system to improve and enhance the online learning and student engagement experience. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 95–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3546157.3546172

  9. Kittur, J., Bekki, J., Brunhaver, S.: Development of a student engagement score for online undergraduate engineering courses using learning management system interaction data. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 30(3), 661–677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Husni, N.H.A., Jumaat, N.F., Tasir, Z.: Investigating student’s cognitive engagement, motivation and cognitive retention in learning management system. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 17(9), 184–200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i09.29727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernando Raguro, M.C., CarpioLagman, A., Abad, L.P., Ong, P.L.S.: Extraction of LMS student engagement and behavioral patterns in online education using decision tree and K-means algorithm. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 138–143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3512353.3512373

  12. Ismail, S.N., Hamid, S., Ahmad, M., Alaboudi, A., Jhanjhi, N.: Exploring students engagement towards the learning management system (LMS) using learning analytics. Comp. Syst. Sci. Eng. 37(1):73–87 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32604/CSSE.2021.015261

  13. Maraza-Quispe, B., Valderrama-Chauca, E.D., Cari-Mogrovejo, L.H., Apaza-Huanca, J.M.: Predictive model of student academic performance from LMS data based on learning analytics. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 13–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3498765.3498768

  14. Fahd, K., Miah, S.J., Ahmed, K.: Predicting student performance in a blended learning environment using learning management system interaction data. Appl. Comp. Inform. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/ACI-06-2021-0150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liz-Dominguez, M., Llamas-Nistal, M., Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., Mikic-Fonte, F.: LMS logs and student performance: the influence of retaking a course. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2022-March, pp. 1970–1974. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766691

  16. Tamada, M.M., Giusti, R., de Magalhaes Netto, J.F.: Predicting student performance based on logs in moodle LMS. In: Proceedings–Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2021-October (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637274

  17. Chen, F., Cui, Y.: Utilizing student time series behaviour in learning management systems for early prediction of course performance. J. Learn. Anal. 7(2), 1–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18608/JLA.2020.72.1

  18. Sanusi, N.M., Kamalrudin, M., Mohtar, S.: Student engagement using learning management system in computer science education. Int. J. Rec. Technol. Eng. 8(2 Special), 743–747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1121.0982S1119

  19. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bulut Özek, M.: The effects of merging student emotion recognition with learning management systems on learners’ motivation and academic achievements Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 26(5), 1862–1872 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22000

  21. Barua, P.D., Zhou, X., Gururajan, R., Chan, K.C.: Determination of factors influencing student engagement using a learning management system in a tertiary setting. In: Proceedings–2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2018, pp. 604–609 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2018.00-30

  22. Saputro, R.E., Salam, S., Zakaria, M.H., Baihaqi, W.M.: The effectiveness of the gamified LMS platform to increase students’ motivation in online courses. Int. J. Adv. Trends Comp. Sci. Eng. 8(1.5 Specia), 327–332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2019/5481.52019

  23. Henrie, C.R., Bodily, R., Larsen, R., Graham, C.R.: Exploring the potential of LMS log data as a proxy measure of student engagement. J. Comput. High. Educ. 30(2), 344–362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9161-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mckay, D.B., Young, B.J.: Engagement of ESL students with a science course delivered in english with an emphasis on assessment using a learning management system. Int. J. Learn. 3(2), 95–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLT.3.2.95-100

  25. Nizam Ismail, S., Hamid, S., Chiroma, H.: The utilization of learning analytics to develop student engagement model in learning management system. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1339(1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012096

  26. Swart, A.J.: Using reflective self-assessments in a learning management system to promote student engagement and academic success. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON pp. 175–180 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942844

  27. Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., Rees, R.: “Check the grade, log out”: students’ engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 46(4), 631–643 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U.: Predicting student performance from LMS data: a comparison of 17 blended courses using moodle LMS. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 17–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2616312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mwalumbwe, I., Mtebe, J.S.: Using learning analytics to predict students’ performance in moodle learning management system: a case of Mbeya University of science and technology. Electron. J. Inform. Syst. in Dev. Countr. 79(1), 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00577.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Prestiadi, D., Wiyono, B.B., Mustabsyiroh, N.: Analysis of online learning media at SIPEJAR as a learning management system (LMS) during the Covid-19 pandemic in improving student performance. In: Proceedings–2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology, ICET 2021, pp. 74–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575115

  31. Riestra-González, M., Paule-Ruíz, M.D.P., Ortin, F.: Massive LMS log data analysis for the early prediction of course-agnostic student performance. Comput. Educ. 163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104108

  32. Shayan, P., van Zaanen, M.: Predicting student performance from their behavior in learning management systems. Int. J. Inform. Educ. Technol. 9(5), 337–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.5.1223

  33. Smarr, B.L., Schirmer, A.E.: 3.4 Million real-world learning management system logins reveal the majority of students experience social jet lag correlated with decreased performance. Sci. Rep. 8(1) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23044-8

  34. Liu, W., Xu, W., Zhan, X., Liu, W., Cheng, W.: Student performance prediction by LMS data and classroom videos. In: 15th International Conference on Computer Science and Education, ICCSE 2020, pp. 535–539 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE49874.2020.9201684

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferreira, R., Cardoso, E., Oliveira, J. (2023). How Can LMS Affect Student’s Motivation and Engagement?. In: Pereira, R., Bianchi, I., Rocha, Á. (eds) Digital Technologies and Transformation in Business, Industry and Organizations. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 497. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40710-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics