Skip to main content

Finding Geometric and Topological Similarities in Building Elements for Large-Scale Pose Updates in Scan-vs-BIM

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Technology in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE 2022)

Abstract

Information-rich BIM models are rarely usable off-the-shelf for operations tasks. Change decisions made on the construction site can lead to significant differences between the as-designed and as-built state of buildings. The responsibility for keeping the digital representation in sync with its physical twin is not defined and will likely only fully be assigned when automatic methods facilitate the geometric update process. To this end, previous research succeeded in (1) identifying if an element was erected at the time and position it was initially designed, and (2) updating the parametric design geometry to fit its LiDAR-measured as-built state under a set of assumptions and threshold values.

The research presented in this paper aims at updating the as-designed model in case of significant pose differences between the as-designed and as-built state. The method leverages graphs to encode the topological connectivity between geometric elements, once for the as-designed BIM model and once for the as-built point cloud. A similarity metric, namely the cosine distance, allows for a quantitative comparison of the topologically enriched point cloud clusters and their corresponding BIM element. The results show that a convincing type-wise similarity can be found in the feature space between the as-built point cloud clusters and the BIM elements. This similarity score becomes meaningful once the element’s topological arrangements are included. An instance-wise similarity score of above 90% is achieved for matching-pairs of free-standing columns and allows for a large-scale pose update in the as-designed BIM model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Industry Foundation Classes – A standardized BIM data exchange format.

  2. 2.

    Wall, Slab, Stairs, Door, Window, Furniture, Column, and Beam.

References

  1. Bosché F, Ahmed M, Turkan Y, Haas CT (2015) The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: the case of cylindrical MEP components. Autom Constr 49:201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braun A, Tuttas S, Stilla U, Borrmann A (2016) Incorporating knowledge on construction methods into automated progress monitoring techniques. In: 23rd International Workshop of the European Group for Intelligent Computing in Engineering, EG-ICE 2016, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braun A, Tuttas S, Borrmann A (2020) Improving progress monitoring by fusing point clouds, semantic data and computer vision. Autom Constr 116(March):103210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Braun A, Tuttas S, Borrmann A, Stilla U (2015) A concept for automated construction progress monitoring using BIM-based geometric constraints and photogrammetric point clouds. J Inf Technol Constr 20(November 2014):68–79

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins FC, Ringsquandl M, Braun A, Hall DM, Borrmann A (2022) Shape encoding for semantic healing of design models and knowledge transfer to Scan-to-BIM. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers - smart infrastructure and construction, pp 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.21.00032

  6. Daum S, Borrmann A (2014) Processing of topological BIM queries using boundary representation based methods. Adv Eng Inf 28(4):272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hackel T, Wegner JD, Schindler K (2016) Contour detection in unstructured 3D point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1610–1618, December 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.178

  8. Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks, pp 1–14. http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02907

  9. Landrieu L, Boussaha M (2019) Point cloud oversegmentation with graph-structured deep metric learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 7432–7441, June 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00762

  10. Landrieu L, Simonovsky M (2017) Large-scale point cloud semantic segmentation with superpoint graphs. CoRR abs/1711.0. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00479

  11. Mafipour MS, Vilgertshofer S, Borrmann A (2021) Deriving digital twin models of existing bridges from point cloud data using parametric models and metaheuristic algorithms. In: EG-ICE 2021 workshop on intelligent computing in engineering, proceedings, pp 464–474

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maheshwari P, Chaudhry R, Vinay V (2021) Scene graph embeddings using relative similarity supervision. In: 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, vol 3B, pp 2328–2336

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rausch C, Haas C (2021) Automated shape and pose updating of building information model elements from 3D point clouds. Autom Constr 124(August 2020):103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rausch C, Nahangi M, Haas C, Liang W (2019) Monte Carlo simulation for tolerance analysis in prefabrication and offsite construction. Autom Constr 103(November 2018):300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Talebi S et al (2021) Causes of defects associated with tolerances in construction: a case study. J Manag Eng 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000914

  16. Turkan Y, Bosche F, Haas CT, Haas R (2012) Automated progress tracking using 4D schedule and 3D sensing technologies. Autom Constr 22:414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuttas S, Braun A, Borrmann A, Stilla U (2015) Validation of BIM components by photogrammetric point clouds for construction site monitoring. ISPRS Ann Photogram, Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 2(3W4), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W4-231-2015

  18. Tuttas S, Braun A, Borrmann A, Stilla U (2017) Acquisition and consecutive registration of photogrammetric point clouds for construction progress monitoring using a 4D BIM. Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundung, Geoinf 85(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-016-0002-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Wu Q, Remil O, Yi C, Guo Y, Wei M (2018) Modeling indoor scenes with repetitions from 3D raw point data. CAD Comput Aided Des 94:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2017.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y, Sun Y, Liu Z, Sarma SE, Bronstein MM, Solomon JM (2019) Dynamic graph CNN for learning on point clouds. ACM Trans Graph 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3326362

  21. Wang Z, Sacks R, Yeung T (2021) Exploring graph neural networks for semantic enrichment: room type classification. Autom Constr (December), 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104039

  22. Werbrouck J, Pauwels P, Bonduel M, Beetz J, Bekers W (2020) Scan-to-graph: semantic enrichment of existing building geometry. Autom Constr 119:103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Winiwarter L et al (2022) Virtual laser scanning with HELIOS++: a novel take on ray tracing-based simulation of topographic full-waveform 3D laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ 269(November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112772

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper is funded by a Georg Nemetschek scholarship which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona C. Collins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Collins, F.C., Braun, A., Borrmann, A. (2024). Finding Geometric and Topological Similarities in Building Elements for Large-Scale Pose Updates in Scan-vs-BIM. In: Skatulla, S., Beushausen, H. (eds) Advances in Information Technology in Civil and Building Engineering. ICCCBE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35399-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35399-4_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35398-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35399-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics