Skip to main content

Policy Demands, Expectations, and Changed Leadership Roles During the COVID-19 Crisis: Critical Comparative Case Studies from Denmark and Iceland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education and Democracy in the Nordic Countries

Abstract

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education has been considerable and Nordic countries were not excluded. The everyday operations and practises of almost all the organisations within education were disrupted. The pandemic threatened the health of students and school staff at all school levels as, well as the financial, operational, and reputational situation of the majority of schools. School leaders played a significant role in the process of deinstitutionalisation of traditional schooling and adapting to the new reality of crisis management e.g., by communicating and coordinating actions with all stakeholders, mediating the information given by school authorities and managing the various dilemmas repeatedly occurring during the pandemic. The aim of this chapter is to present a historical timeline for a one-year period that reflects the policy demands that were imposed on school leaders in compulsory education in Denmark, and upper secondary education in Iceland, by analysing formal policy-instructions sent via e-mails to the school leaders. In particular, the chapter critically analyses the roles and demands placed on school leaders when facing everchanging social structures and ambiguous policy expectations stipulated by the educational authorities from both countries. This we did by drawing on theoretical concepts from neo-institutional theories, critical discourse analysis, and critical policy theory. Three role categories were evident in the data with substantial sub-categories explaining the complex processes of deinstitutionalisation taking place during the research period and new and changed role of school leaders; the first traditional crisis management roles, the second contemporary safety management roles, and the third is linked to educational roles conventionally guiding the education systems. The identified leadership roles are related to an overall social order defined by the crisis. Here, the traditional, Nordic democratic values that uphold the education system, such as social deliberation, decentralisation, and trust between school leaders, professionals, students, and their families, were challenged as well as various issues of social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, S. (2016). Global education policy and the postmodern challenge. In The handbook of global education policy (p. 504).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestsdóttir, S. M., Ragnarsdóttir, G. Björnsdóttir, A., & Eiríksdóttir, E. (2020). Fjarkennsla í faraldri: Nám og kennsla í framhaldsskólum á tímum samkomubanns vegna COVID-19. Netla – Veftímarit um uppeldi og menntun. Sérrit: Menntakerfi og heimili á tímum COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.24270/serritnetla.2020.25

  • Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19 – School leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, S. G. (2021). Schooling and education in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Food for thought and reflection derived from results of the school barometer in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 49(1), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónasson, J. T., Ragnarsdóttir, G., & Bjarnadóttir, V. D. (2021). The intricacies of educational development in Iceland: Stability or disruption? In L. Moos & J. B. Krejsler (Eds.), School, the Nordic dimension and the turn towards ‘evidence’. Springer publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66629-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S., & Moore, J. H. (2002). Executive migration and institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2013). Improving secondary schools. In A. Luke, A. Woods, & K. Weir (Eds.), Curriculum syllabus design and equity. A primer and model (pp. 129–143). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, B. A., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoE. (2013). Aftale mellem regeringen om et fagligt løft af folkeskolen. [Governmental agreement on academic achievements in the public school]. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/udd/folke/pdf14/okt/141010-endelig-aftaletekst-7-6-2013.pdf

  • MoE. (2019). Bekendtgørelse om elevers fravær i folkeskolen. BEK nr 1063 af 24/10/2019. [Law on student absence in the public school]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/1063

  • MoE. (2020a). Bekendtgørelse om nødundervisning. BEK nr. 242 af 19/03/2020. [Law on emergency teaching]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/242

  • MoE. (2020b). Dagtilbuds- og nødundervisningsbekendtgørelsen. BEK nr 629 af 15/05/2020. [Law on daycare and emergency teaching]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/629

  • MoE. (2020c). Retningslinjer for fase 2 i genåbningen for skoler og uddannelsesinstitutioner på BUVM‘s område. [Regulations of the second phase of the re-opening of public schools and education institutions]. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/aktuelt/pdf20/maj/200523-retningslinjer-for-skoler-oguddannelsesinstitutioner-ua.pdf

  • MoE. (2020d). Retningslinjer for grundskoler samt ungdoms- og voksenuddannelser på MoEs område ifm. Forebyggelse af smittespredning af COVID-19. [Regulations of the public schools and youth education institutions in relation to the prevention of spread of COVID-19 infections]. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/aktuelt/pdf20/jun/200619-retningslinjer-for-grundskoler-samt-ungdoms-og-voksenuddannelser-ua.pdf

  • MoE. (2020e). EKSTRA: Nyhedsbrev til grundskolesektoren ifm. COVID-19 (uge 20). [Extra: Newsletter for the public schools in relation to Covid-19 (week 20)]. https://www.uvm.dk/-/media/filer/uvm/aktuelt/pdf20/maj/200519-ekstra-nyhedsbrev-til-grundskolesektoren-ifmcovid-19-uge-20.pdf

  • MoE. (2020f). Lov om midlertidige foranstaltninger på børne- og undervisningsområdet og folkehøjskoleområdet og for den frie folkeoplysende virksomhed til forebyggelse og afhjælpning i forbindelse med covid-19. LOV nr 241 af 19/03/2020. [Law on contemporary initiatives within the child- and education field and adult education to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 infection]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/241

  • MoH. (2020a). Instruks til personale i forbindelse med genåbning af skoler og fritidsordninger. [Instruction for staff in relation to the re-opening of schools and daycare institutions]. https://www.skolelederforeningen.org/media/44254/instruks-til-personale-i-skoler-og-fritidsordninger.pdf

  • MoH. (2020b). Personer i øget risiko. [Persons at increased risk]. https://www.sst.dk/da/corona/personer-i-oeget-risiko

  • Moos, L. (2013). Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ragnarsdóttir, G. (2020). School leaders’ actions and hybridity when carrying out reform and confronting teachers’ responses: Institutional and organisational perspectives. Education Inquiry, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950272

  • Ragnarsdóttir, G., & Jónasson, J. T. (2022). Stofnunareðli framhaldsskóla í faraldurskreppu. Ný reynsla og breytt umboð skólastjórnenda [The institutional nature of upper secondary education during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: New experience and changed agency of school leaders]. Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration, 18(2), 183–312. https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2022.18.2.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Meyer, H., & Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organizations: Changing ideas for changing times (pp. 15–32). The New Institutionalism in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests and identities (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Riley, D. (2012). School leadership in times of crisis. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storgaard, M. (2019a). ‘High stakes’ eller ‘low stakes’? I Usynlige’ glidninger i uddannelse og pædagogik (red. Moos, L). Aarhus Universitetsforlag. https://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/edu/Udgivelser/E-boeger/Ebog_-_Glidninger.pdf

  • Storgaard, M. (2019b). Mening og magt i skoleledelse: konstruktioner af styring i højtpræsterende skoler i et internationalt komparativt perspektiv (Sensemaking and power in school leadership. Contructions of governance in high achieving schools in an international comparative perspective). Doctoral dissertation, Aarhus University, Copenhagen. https://ebooks.au.dk/aul/catalog/book/357

  • Storgaard, M. (2020). Local and global? Challenging the social epistemologies of the educational leadership field. In Re-centering the critical potential of Nordic school leadership research (pp. 53–68). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. W., & Chase-Mayoral, A. (2014). Shifting the discourse on neo-institutional theory in comparative and international education. In Annual review of comparative and international education 2013. Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guðrún Ragnarsdóttir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ragnarsdóttir, G., Storgaard, M. (2023). Policy Demands, Expectations, and Changed Leadership Roles During the COVID-19 Crisis: Critical Comparative Case Studies from Denmark and Iceland. In: Gunnulfsen, A.E., Ärlestig, H., Storgaard, M. (eds) Education and Democracy in the Nordic Countries. Educational Governance Research, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33195-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33195-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33194-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33195-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics