Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

How Do Citizens Want to Participate in Smart City Programs? Some Answers from Greece

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable, Innovative and Intelligent Societies and Cities

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

  • 334 Accesses

Abstract

For democratically elected local authorities that are pursuing smart city goals, public engagement is a logical priority. To that aim, the rapid development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is typically recognized as holding great promises toward improving cooperation between citizens and public administrations. However, ICT also brings important challenges. Particularly important is the identification of the right incentives and technologies and the development of the best methods. In this book chapter, we present and discuss preliminary results from a public survey which attempted to clarify these aspects in the context of Greece. A questionnaire was developed and distributed by email and social media. In line with the usual expectations in Western high-income countries, the results show that the majority of respondents wish to participate by using ICT, especially through applications available on smart mobile devices, especially motivated by personal interest and education levels. There is a clear and overwhelming desire of the citizens to be involved as partners, based on an intelligent and practical combination of democratic principles and technologies. At the same time, the results highlighted a list of technical aspects that may need special attention during academic research and public policy-making. While the described study reflects a Western and democratic, bottom-up type of policy-making input (acting in complementarity with more top-down institutional frameworks), it also reflects a universal set of human rights. Thus, the fact that this study comes from the cradle of civilization that is Greece (with its city states of ancient times and its uninterrupted civilizational continuum up to present times) holds a particularly strong and interesting significance for the future of humanity. In the context of current knowledge, according to which the global transition to sustainable development incorporates also smart city thinking (and vice versa), national policy-makers cannot just “inform” the citizens but must involve them right from the beginning; otherwise the proposed solutions will fail to be accepted or/and will be too weak, and more problems will arise. Since this is as important for the Greeks as it is for the whole world, our study underscores the fact that researchers have a duty to study societal issues while public administrators have a duty to organize intelligent, transparent, and efficient dialogue with both experts and citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics

References

  1. D. Jurlina Alibegović, S. Slijepčević, Attitudes towards citizen participation in the local decision-making process: A comparative analysis. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja 27(1) (2018). https://doi.org/10.5559/di.27.1.08

  2. V. Roblek, M. Meško, Smart city knowledge management: Holistic review and the analysis of the urban knowledge management, in The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, (2020, June), pp. 52–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. ESCWA, Open Government Citizen Engagement Toolkit (United Nations, Beirut, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Simonofski, T. Vallé, E. Serral, Y. Wautelet, Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: A comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 56, 102011 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. West Lothian Community Planning, Engaging Communities Toolkit. A Practical Guide to Community Engagement (West Lothian Community Planning, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Albino, U. Berardi, R.M. Dangelico, Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22(1), 3–21 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Stratigea, C.A. Papadopoulou, M. Panagiotopoulou, Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities. J. Urban Technol. 22(2), 43–62 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Fitsilis, P. Tsoutsa, L. Anthopoulos, O. Ragos, Teamwork behavior in smart and sustainable cities ecosystems, in The Eighth International Conference on Advanced Collaborative Networks, Systems and Applications, (Venice, Italy, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Boykova, I. Ilina, M. Salazkin, The smart city approach as a response to emerging challenges for urban development. Форсайт 10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.P. del Hoyo, A. Visvizi, H. Mora, Inclusiveness, safety, resilience, and sustainability in the smart city context, in Smart Cities and the UN SDGs, (Elsevier, 2021), pp. 15–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Borowy, The social dimension of sustainable development at the UN: From Brundtland to the SDGs, in The Struggle for Social Sustainability, (Policy Press, 2021), pp. 89–108

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Giddings, B. Hopwood, G. O’brien, Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 10(4), 187–196 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gowdy, J.D. Erickson, The approach of ecological economics. Camb. J. Econ. 29(2), 207–222 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D.L.A. Lozano, S.E.D. Márquez, M.E.M. Puentes, Sustainable and smart mobility evaluation since citizen participation in responsive cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 58, 519–526 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Leichenko, Climate change and urban resilience. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 3(3), 164–168 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Martikka, S. Salo, K. Siilin, T. Ruohomäki, P. Tuomaala, E. Nykänen, Smart city resilience with active citizen engagement in Helsinki, in 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS), (IEEE, 2018, September), pp. 162–167

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. P. van Waart, I. Mulder, C. de Bont, A participatory approach for envisioning a smart city. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 708–723 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Cardullo, R. Kitchin, Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal 84(1), 1–13 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M.E. Cortés-Cediel, I. Cantador, M.P.R. Bolívar, Analyzing citizen participation and engagement in European smart cities. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 39(4), 592–626 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Radu, Citizen participation in the decision making process at local and county levels in the Romanian public institutions. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci.. Retrieved in October 20 2011 6, 76–92 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. B.K. Mak, L.T. Cheung, D.L. Hui, Community participation in the decision-making process for sustainable tourism development in rural areas of Hong Kong, China. Sustainability 9(10), 1695 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Ianniello, S. Iacuzzi, P. Fedele, L. Brusati, Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: A systematic review. Public Manag. Rev. 21(1), 21–46 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Bouzguenda, C. Alalouch, N. Fava, Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 50, 101627 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Falanga, The national participatory budget in Portugal: Opportunities and challenges for scaling up citizen participation in policymaking, in Hope for Democracy: 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, (2018), pp. 447–466

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Tadili, H. Fasly, Citizen participation in smart cities: A survey, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications, (2019, October), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Arnstein, A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Gaber, Building “a ladder of citizen participation”. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 85(3), 188–201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1612267

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Tsoutsa, O. Iatrellis, O. Ragos, P. Fitsilis, A framework for developing teamwork enabled services in smart city domains, in 2021 the 4th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business, (2021, January), pp. 26–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Tsoutsa, P. Fitsilis, L. Anthopoulos, O. Ragos, Nexus services in smart city ecosystems. J. Knowl. Econ. 12(2), 431–451 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J.M. López-Quiles, M.P.R. Bolívar, Smart technologies for smart governments: A review of technological tools in smart cities, in Smart Technologies for Smart Governments, (2018), pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  31. R.G. Hollands, Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3), 303–320 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. L. Berntzen, M.R. Johannessen, The role of citizen participation in municipal smart city projects: Lessons learned from Norway, in Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, (Springer, Cham, 2016), pp. 299–314

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Coe, G. Paquet, J. Roy, E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 19(1), 80–93 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P. Bishop, G. Davis, Mapping public participation in policy choices. Aust. J. Public Adm. 61(1), 14–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. NHS Lothian, Public Engagement. A New Framework (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Simonofski, E.S. Asensio, J. De Smedt, M. Snoeck, Citizen participation in smart cities: Evaluation framework proposal, in 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 1, (IEEE, 2017, July), pp. 227–236

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. L. Berntzen, M.R. Johannessen, The role of citizens in “smart cities”, in Management International Conference, (2016, June)

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Panopoulou, E. Tambouris, K. Tarabanis, eParticipation initiatives in Europe: Learning from practitioners, in International Conference on Electronic Participation, (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010, August), pp. 54–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. SPARC BC, Community Engagement Toolkit (Social Planning and Research Council of British Columbia, Burnaby, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. EFSA, Engagement Toolkit. Methods, Tips and Best Practices to Design Effective Participatory Processes (European Food Safety Authority, Parma, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. Schmitz, Community Engagement Toolkit v2.2 (Collective Impact Forum, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. P. Hanfling, S. Majeed, E. Cox, The Manchester Community Engagement Toolkit (Manchester City Council, Manchester, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Department of Environment‚ Land‚ Water and Planning, Effective Engagement: Building Relationships with Community and Other Stakeholders. Book 3: The Engagement Toolkit, 4th edn. (State Government of Victoria, Melbourne, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Department of Infrastructure Local Government and Planning, Community Engagement Toolkit for Planning (Queensland Government, Brisbane, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Community Places, Community Planning Toolkit (Community Engagement, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Community Planning and Inclusion Glenorchy City Council, Community Engagement Toolkit (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Futurewise, Interim CDA, One America, El Centro de la Raza, Community Engagement Toolkit (Guidance and Resources for Engaging Community in Planning and Policy Development, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Department of City Planning Pittsburgh City, Community Engagement Toolkit (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  49. SFU Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue, Public Engagement Toolkit (SFU, 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Boston Public Health Commission, Equitable Community Engagement Toolkit 2020–2023 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Slough Borough Council, Community Engagement Toolkit (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  52. G. Hutcheson, N. Sofroniou, The multivariate social scientist (Sage, London, 1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: Introducing Statistical Method, 3rd edn. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. Tsoutsa, O. Ragos, Towards an ontology for teamwork enabled services, in Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Systems, (2020, January), pp. 69–75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. P. Tsoutsa, I.C. Lampropoulos, Preparing for smart cities’ future competences: Trends arising through keyword and review analysis, in Building on Smart Cities Skills and Competences, (Springer, Cham, 2022), pp. 37–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Business Sciences, Business Administration Department, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece

    Panos Fitsilis & Rodanthi Tsivola

  2. School of Economics and Business Sciences, Accounting and Finance Department, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece

    Paraskevi Tsoutsa & Vyron Damasiotis

Authors
  1. Panos Fitsilis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paraskevi Tsoutsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vyron Damasiotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rodanthi Tsivola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panos Fitsilis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems Department, Algoritmi Research Center, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal

    Carlos Filipe da Silva Portela

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fitsilis, P., Tsoutsa, P., Damasiotis, V., Tsivola, R. (2023). How Do Citizens Want to Participate in Smart City Programs? Some Answers from Greece. In: da Silva Portela, C.F. (eds) Sustainable, Innovative and Intelligent Societies and Cities. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30514-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30514-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30513-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30514-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics