Skip to main content

Framing Effects on Renewable Energy News

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Development and the Environmental Ecosystem

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

The use and development of renewable energy technologies and sources have become a significant policy incentive in many countries across the globe. Promoting renewable energy was already instituted in most nations, but many legal and institutional barriers and public ambivalence remained. Thus, it has become necessary to encourage discussion on the issue. Press came into action to provide the required information and insight. However, the literature proved that the media was never utterly objective in this regard. Instead, the studies indicated that the focus of the news, articles, and reports represented a priori stance on the issues and served as promotional materials to support that previously embraced perspective. Scholars addressed two leading indicators of the frames embedded in national media. The most prevailing one is the current economic and political context. Forces such as the socio-economic situation, eco-political agenda and even international relations have influenced the farming employed by the press to either promote or degrade renewable energy technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bayram, P. (2020). Doğu Akdeniz Enerji Rekabetinde Türkiye Temsilleri: Sosyal Medya Üzerinden Bir Analiz. In S. Özer (Ed.), Doğu Akdeniz; Jeopolitik ve Ekonomik Dinamiklerin Dünü ve Bugünü. Paradigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayulgen, O., & Benegal, S. (2019). Green priorities: How economic frames affect perceptions of renewable energy in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becerikli, S., Altun, A., & Yüksel Özmen, Ş. (2017). Medya ve Enerji: Medyada Enerji Verimliliğini İçeren Metinlerin Analizi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 44, 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., Kostis, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Balanced-scorecard-based evaluation of knowledge-oriented competencies of distributed energy investments. Energies, 15(21), 8245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. J. (2013). The hermeneutics of frames and framing: An examination of the media’s construction of reality. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013487915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehler-Holland, J., Schumacher, K., & Fichtner, W. (2021). Topic modeling uncovers shifts in media framing of the German renewable energy act. Patterns, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delshad, A., & Raymond, L. (2013). Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels. Review of Policy Research, 30(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer, H., Aksoy, T., Yüksel, S., & Hacioglu, U. (2022b). Golden cut-oriented q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-making approach to evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for microgeneration system investments. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2022c). Collaboration enhanced hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to analyze the renewable energy investment projects. Energy Reports, 8, 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Mikhaylov, A., Pinter, G., & Shaikh, Z. A. (2022a). Analysis of renewable-friendly smart grid technologies for the distributed energy investment projects using a hybrid picture fuzzy rough decision-making approach. Energy Reports, 8, 11466–11477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djerf-Pierre, M., Cokley, J., & Kuchel, L. J. (2016). Framing renewable energy: A comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, W., Zhao, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2022). A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy, 185, 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Q., & Han, Z. (2020). The framing of nuclear energy in Chinese media discourse: A comparison between national and local newspapers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eti, S., Dinçer, H., Gökalp, Y., Yüksel, S., & Kararoğlu, D. (2023). Identifying key issues to handle the inflation problem in the healthcare industry caused by energy prices: An evaluation with decision-making models. Managing Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions in the Global Economy, 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, S., Zhou, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Assessment of safety management system on energy investment risk using house of quality based on hybrid stochastic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making approach. Safety Science, 141, 105333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber, I. E., Toth, M., Hajdu, R., Haber, K., & Pinter, G. (2021). Exploring public opinions on renewable energy by using conventional methods and social media analysis. Energies, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haiyun, C., Zhixiong, H., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, J. P., Røyrvik, J., & Fyhn, H. (2020). Energy efficiency in norwegian news media: A glitch in the discourse-as-usual. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 8(2), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v8i2.3393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, K. I., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Impact-relation map of innovative service development regarding the sustainable growth for emerging markets. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger, A. (1995). The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2020). How the news media persuades: Framing effects and beyond. In B. Grofman, E. Suhay, & A. Trechsel (Eds.), Oxford handbook of electoral persuasion (pp. 151–168). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022b). Understanding the financial innovation priorities for renewable energy investors via QFD-based picture fuzzy and rough numbers. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Yüksel, S., Dınçer, H., Mikhaylov, A., & Barykin, S. E. (2022a). Bipolar q-ROF hybrid decision making model with golden cut for analyzing the levelized cost of renewable energy alternatives. IEEE Access, 10, 42507–42517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki, J. (2018). Renewable energy in the news: Environmental, economic, policy and technology discussion of biogas. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, L., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). A hybrid decision making approach for new service development process of renewable energy investment. Applied Soft Computing, 133, 109897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado-Sáez, M. T., Marco-Crespo, E., & Álvarez-Villa, À. (2019). Exploring news frames, sources and editorial lines on newspaper coverage of nuclear energy in Spain. Environmental Communication, 13(4), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhaylov, A., Bhatti, I. M., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Integrated decision recommendation system using iteration-enhanced collaborative filtering, golden cut bipolar for analyzing the risk-based oil market spillovers. Computational Economics, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mišić, M., & Obydenkova, A. (2022). Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia. Post-Communist Economies, 34(5), 684–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtarov, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey. Renewable Energy, 187, 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/586517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkul, E., Bilgin, Y., & Çifçi, S. (2010). Enerji Sektörü Kümelenmelerinde Medyanın Rolü ve Önemi. In H. Eraslan (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Avantajı Elde Etmede Enerji Sektörü Sektörel Stratejiler ve Uygulamalar (pp. 1099–1115). URAK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Opgenhaffen, M., & Van Gorp, B. (2019). Negotiating climate change: A frame analysis of COP21 in British, American, and Chinese news media. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518823969

  • Park, D. J., Wang, W., & Pinto, J. (2016). Beyond disaster and risk: Post-Fukushima nuclear news in US and German press. Communication, Culture & Critique, 9, 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochyadi-Reetz, M., Arlt, D., Wolling, J., & Bräuer, M. (2019). Explaining the Media's framing of renewable energies: An international comparison. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7(119), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffacher, M., Muggli, N., Scolobig, A., & Moser, C. (2015). Framing deep geothermal energy in mass media: The case of Switzerland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Peng, J., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Coalition-oriented strategic selection of renewable energy system alternatives using q-ROF DEMATEL with golden cut. Energy, 256, 124606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2020). Framing in renewable energy policies: A glossary. Energies, 13(11), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W., & Reid, T. (2010). Green dreams or pipe dreams?: Media framing of the US biofuels movement. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(4), 1390–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, G., Xie, F., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ)-based strategic mapping of green nuclear energy investments with spherical fuzzy group decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(8), 12284–12300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Identifying the strategic priorities of nuclear energy investments using hesitant 2-tuple interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 145, 104103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Eti, S., & Adalı, Z. (2022). Strategy improvements to minimize the drawbacks of geothermal investments by using spherical fuzzy modelling. International Journal of Energy Research, 46(8), 10796–10807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, C., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). An integrated hesitant 2-tuple Pythagorean fuzzy analysis of QFD-based innovation cost and duration for renewable energy projects. Energy, 248, 123561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukas, K. J. (2015). New media, new structures: How digital journalists frame renewable energy stories. GSTF Journal on Media & Communications (JMC), 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40874-014-0012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merve Yazici .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yazici, M., Gültekin, D.G. (2023). Framing Effects on Renewable Energy News. In: Dincer, H., Yüksel, S. (eds) Economic Development and the Environmental Ecosystem. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26596-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics