Abstract
The use and development of renewable energy technologies and sources have become a significant policy incentive in many countries across the globe. Promoting renewable energy was already instituted in most nations, but many legal and institutional barriers and public ambivalence remained. Thus, it has become necessary to encourage discussion on the issue. Press came into action to provide the required information and insight. However, the literature proved that the media was never utterly objective in this regard. Instead, the studies indicated that the focus of the news, articles, and reports represented a priori stance on the issues and served as promotional materials to support that previously embraced perspective. Scholars addressed two leading indicators of the frames embedded in national media. The most prevailing one is the current economic and political context. Forces such as the socio-economic situation, eco-political agenda and even international relations have influenced the farming employed by the press to either promote or degrade renewable energy technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bayram, P. (2020). Doğu Akdeniz Enerji Rekabetinde Türkiye Temsilleri: Sosyal Medya Üzerinden Bir Analiz. In S. Özer (Ed.), Doğu Akdeniz; Jeopolitik ve Ekonomik Dinamiklerin Dünü ve Bugünü. Paradigma.
Bayulgen, O., & Benegal, S. (2019). Green priorities: How economic frames affect perceptions of renewable energy in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.017
Becerikli, S., Altun, A., & Yüksel Özmen, Ş. (2017). Medya ve Enerji: Medyada Enerji Verimliliğini İçeren Metinlerin Analizi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 44, 193–214.
Carayannis, E., Kostis, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Balanced-scorecard-based evaluation of knowledge-oriented competencies of distributed energy investments. Energies, 15(21), 8245.
Carter, M. J. (2013). The hermeneutics of frames and framing: An examination of the media’s construction of reality. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013487915
Dehler-Holland, J., Schumacher, K., & Fichtner, W. (2021). Topic modeling uncovers shifts in media framing of the German renewable energy act. Patterns, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100169
Delshad, A., & Raymond, L. (2013). Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels. Review of Policy Research, 30(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12009
Dinçer, H., Aksoy, T., Yüksel, S., & Hacioglu, U. (2022b). Golden cut-oriented q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-making approach to evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for microgeneration system investments. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2022c). Collaboration enhanced hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to analyze the renewable energy investment projects. Energy Reports, 8, 377–389.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Mikhaylov, A., Pinter, G., & Shaikh, Z. A. (2022a). Analysis of renewable-friendly smart grid technologies for the distributed energy investment projects using a hybrid picture fuzzy rough decision-making approach. Energy Reports, 8, 11466–11477.
Djerf-Pierre, M., Cokley, J., & Kuchel, L. J. (2016). Framing renewable energy: A comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542
Dong, W., Zhao, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2022). A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy, 185, 321–337.
Du, Q., & Han, Z. (2020). The framing of nuclear energy in Chinese media discourse: A comparison between national and local newspapers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118695
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Eti, S., Dinçer, H., Gökalp, Y., Yüksel, S., & Kararoğlu, D. (2023). Identifying key issues to handle the inflation problem in the healthcare industry caused by energy prices: An evaluation with decision-making models. Managing Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions in the Global Economy, 162–178.
Fang, S., Zhou, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Assessment of safety management system on energy investment risk using house of quality based on hybrid stochastic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making approach. Safety Science, 141, 105333.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405
Haber, I. E., Toth, M., Hajdu, R., Haber, K., & Pinter, G. (2021). Exploring public opinions on renewable energy by using conventional methods and social media analysis. Energies, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113089
Haiyun, C., Zhixiong, H., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110844.
Johansen, J. P., Røyrvik, J., & Fyhn, H. (2020). Energy efficiency in norwegian news media: A glitch in the discourse-as-usual. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 8(2), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v8i2.3393
Kafka, K. I., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Impact-relation map of innovative service development regarding the sustainable growth for emerging markets. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–24.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
Kühberger, A. (1995). The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1046
LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.433
Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2020). How the news media persuades: Framing effects and beyond. In B. Grofman, E. Suhay, & A. Trechsel (Eds.), Oxford handbook of electoral persuasion (pp. 151–168). Oxford University Press.
Li, W., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022b). Understanding the financial innovation priorities for renewable energy investors via QFD-based picture fuzzy and rough numbers. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–30.
Li, J., Yüksel, S., Dınçer, H., Mikhaylov, A., & Barykin, S. E. (2022a). Bipolar q-ROF hybrid decision making model with golden cut for analyzing the levelized cost of renewable energy alternatives. IEEE Access, 10, 42507–42517.
Lyytimäki, J. (2018). Renewable energy in the news: Environmental, economic, policy and technology discussion of biogas. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.04.004
Martínez, L., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). A hybrid decision making approach for new service development process of renewable energy investment. Applied Soft Computing, 133, 109897.
Mercado-Sáez, M. T., Marco-Crespo, E., & Álvarez-Villa, À. (2019). Exploring news frames, sources and editorial lines on newspaper coverage of nuclear energy in Spain. Environmental Communication, 13(4), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435558
Mikhaylov, A., Bhatti, I. M., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Integrated decision recommendation system using iteration-enhanced collaborative filtering, golden cut bipolar for analyzing the risk-based oil market spillovers. Computational Economics, 1–34.
Mišić, M., & Obydenkova, A. (2022). Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia. Post-Communist Economies, 34(5), 684–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928
Mukhtarov, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey. Renewable Energy, 187, 169–176.
Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/586517
Özkul, E., Bilgin, Y., & Çifçi, S. (2010). Enerji Sektörü Kümelenmelerinde Medyanın Rolü ve Önemi. In H. Eraslan (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Avantajı Elde Etmede Enerji Sektörü Sektörel Stratejiler ve Uygulamalar (pp. 1099–1115). URAK.
Pan, Y., Opgenhaffen, M., & Van Gorp, B. (2019). Negotiating climate change: A frame analysis of COP21 in British, American, and Chinese news media. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518823969
Park, D. J., Wang, W., & Pinto, J. (2016). Beyond disaster and risk: Post-Fukushima nuclear news in US and German press. Communication, Culture & Critique, 9, 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12119
Rochyadi-Reetz, M., Arlt, D., Wolling, J., & Bräuer, M. (2019). Explaining the Media's framing of renewable energies: An international comparison. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7(119), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00119
Stauffacher, M., Muggli, N., Scolobig, A., & Moser, C. (2015). Framing deep geothermal energy in mass media: The case of Switzerland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.018
Sun, L., Peng, J., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Coalition-oriented strategic selection of renewable energy system alternatives using q-ROF DEMATEL with golden cut. Energy, 256, 124606.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Wolsink, M. (2020). Framing in renewable energy policies: A glossary. Energies, 13(11), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112871
Wright, W., & Reid, T. (2010). Green dreams or pipe dreams?: Media framing of the US biofuels movement. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(4), 1390–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.07.020
Yuan, G., Xie, F., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ)-based strategic mapping of green nuclear energy investments with spherical fuzzy group decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(8), 12284–12300.
Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Identifying the strategic priorities of nuclear energy investments using hesitant 2-tuple interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 145, 104103.
Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Eti, S., & Adalı, Z. (2022). Strategy improvements to minimize the drawbacks of geothermal investments by using spherical fuzzy modelling. International Journal of Energy Research, 46(8), 10796–10807.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, C., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). An integrated hesitant 2-tuple Pythagorean fuzzy analysis of QFD-based innovation cost and duration for renewable energy projects. Energy, 248, 123561.
Zukas, K. J. (2015). New media, new structures: How digital journalists frame renewable energy stories. GSTF Journal on Media & Communications (JMC), 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40874-014-0012-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yazici, M., Gültekin, D.G. (2023). Framing Effects on Renewable Energy News. In: Dincer, H., Yüksel, S. (eds) Economic Development and the Environmental Ecosystem. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26596-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26596-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26595-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26596-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)