Abstract
Intercultural studies are scarce but yet insightful to better understand reactions of older adults to human-like Android robot behavior. They help to see which reactions of participants are universal and which are country specific. Research with android robots and older adults has many results that are based on online research with pictures or on research that has been carried out in labs in one country. Within a Japanese-European research project, we had the rare occasion to work with an android robot in both countries and compare the results. We collected data from 19 participants that were invited in a Living Lab at two universities in Japan and Germany. The data contains interviews, videos and questionnaires and was analyzed with a mixed method approach. Results indicate that the android robots of this study are not in the valley of the uncanny valley theory. We could observe that the older adults and stakeholders from both countries were open to talk to the robot, some even about private topics, while others preferred to use the robot to retrieve information. German participants wished for more gestures, while Japanese participants were keen on the relatively little number of gestures. With this work we contribute to a broader understanding on how older adults perceive android robots and could show that an android robot with its human-like appearance is not seen as uncanny.
The presented work has received funding from the European Union under grant agreement no. 101016453 and from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) of Japan under grand agreement no. JPJ000595.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alexander, V.D., Thomas, H., Cronin, A., Fielding, J., Moran-Ellis, J.: Mixed methods. Res. Social Life 3, 125–144 (2008)
Aminuddin, R., Sharkey, A., Levita, L:. Interaction with the paro robot may reduce psychophysiological stress responses. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 593–594, 2016
Andtfolk, M., Nyholm, L., Eide, H., Fagerström, L.:. Humanoid robots in the care of older persons: a scoping review. Assistive Technology, pp. 1–9 (2021)
Appel, M., Izydorczyk, D., Weber, S., Mara, M., Lischetzke, T.: The uncanny of mind in a machine: humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 102, 274–286 (2020)
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009)
Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Kennsuke, K.: Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots. In: Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems And Open Challenges In Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 1–4, AISB, 01 (2005)
Boudouraki, A., Reeves, S., Fischer, J.E., Rintel, S.: Mediated visits: Longitudinal domestic dwelling with mobile robotic telepresence. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’22, New York, NY, USA, . Association for Computing Machinery (2022)
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health 11(4), 589–597 (2019)
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Can i use ta? should i use ta? should i not use ta? comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Couns. Psychother. Res. 21(1), 37–47 (2021)
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Terry, G,: Thematic Analysis, pages 1–18. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
Carros, F., et al.: Exploring human-robot interaction with the elderly: results from a ten-week case study in a care home. CHI ’20, pp. 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376402
Carros, F., et al: Care workers making use of robots: Results of a three-month study on human-robot interaction within a care home. In: Proceedings of the CHI (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517435
Carros, F., Störzinger, T., Wierling, A., Preussner, A., Tolmie, P.: Ethical, legal & participatory concerns in the development of human-robot interaction: Lessons from eight research projects with social robots in real-world scenarios. i-com, 21(2), 299–309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2022-0025
Chang, Y.-H., Carros, F., Manavi, M., Rathmann, M.: How do roboticists imagine a robotised future? a case study on a japanese hri research project (2022). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202204.0081.v1
Chen, Y.-S., Lu, J.-M., Hsu, Y.-L.: Design and evaluation of a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with older adults. In: Biswas, J., Kobayashi, H., Wong, L., Abdulrazak, B., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2013. LNCS, vol. 7910, pp. 298–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39470-6_39
Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of oz studies – why and how. Knowl.-Based Syst. 6(4), 258–266 (1993)
Feingold-Polak, R., Elishay, A., Shahar, Y., Stein, M., Edan, Y., Levy-Tzedek, S.: Differences between young and old users when interacting with a humanoid robot: a qualitative usability study. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 9(1), 183–192 (2018)
Felzmann, H., Murphy, K., Casey, D., Beyan, O.: Robot-assisted care for elderly with dementia: is there a potential for genuine end-user empowerment? vol. 03 (2015)
Haring, K.S., Silvera-Tawil, D., Matsumoto, Y., Velonaki, M., Watanabe, K.: Perception of an android robot in Japan and Australia: a cross-cultural comparison. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8755, pp. 166–175. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_17
Helm, M., Carros, F., Schädler, J., Wulf, V.: Zoomorphic robots and people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2022, MuC ’22, pp. 431–436, New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543758.3547552
Ishiguro, H.: Android science. In: Robotics Research, pp. 118–127. Springer, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48113-3_11
Jokinen, K., Homma, K., Matsumoto, Y., Fukuda, K.: Integration and interaction of trustworthy ai in a virtual coach. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of JSAI, JSAI2021:1N2IS5a04-1N2IS5a04 (2021)
Maulsby, D., Greenberg, S., Mander, R.: Prototyping an intelligent agent through wizard of oz. In: Arnold, B., Ashlund, S., editors, CHI ’93: Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 277–284, [S.l.], 1993. ACM
McCarney, R., Warner, J., Iliffe, S., van Haselen, R., Griffin, M., Fisher, P.: The hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 7(1) (2007)
Minato, T., Shimada, M., Ishiguro, H., Itakura, S.: Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction. In: Orchard, B., Yang, C., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3029, pp. 424–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24677-0_44
Mori, M.: The uncanny valley: the original essay by masahiro mori. IEEE Spectrum(1970)
Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Geminoid: teleoperated android of an existing person. Humanoid RoboT.: New Develop.d 14, 343–352 (2007)
Pu, L., Moyle, W., Jones, C., Todorovic, M.: The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist 59(1), e37–e51 (2019)
Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., Joublin, F.: To err is human (-like): Effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5(3), 313–323 (2013)
Satoh, H. , Kawabata, T., Sankai, Y.: Bathing care assistance with robot suit hal. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), pp. 498–503 (2009)
Schwaninger, I., Carros, F., Weiss, A., Wulf, V., Fitzpatrick, G.: Video connecting families and social robots: from ideas to practices putting technology to work. Universal Access in the Information Society, pp. 1–13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00901-y
Shimada, M., Minato, T., Itakura, S., Ishiguro, H.: Uncanny Valley of Androids and Its Lateral Inhibition Hypothesis. In: RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 374–379 (2007)
Störzinger, T., Carros, F., Wierling, A., Misselhorn, C., Wieching, R.: Categorizing social robots with respect to dimensions relevant to ethical, social and legal implications. i-com, 19(1), 47–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0005
Tashakkori, A., Creswell, J.W.: The new era of mixed methods (2007)
Trovato, G., et al.: A novel culture-dependent gesture selection system for a humanoid robot performing greeting interaction. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) ICSR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8755, pp. 340–349. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_35
Trovato, G., Eyssel, F.: Mind attribution to androids: A comparative study with italian and japanese adolescents. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp. 561–566. IEEE (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172358
Wang, S., Lilienfeld, S.O., Rochat, P.: The uncanny valley: existence and explanations. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19(4), 393–407 (2015)
Weiss, A., Bartneck, C.: Meta analysis of the usage of the godspeed questionnaire series. In: 24th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 381–388 IEEE (2015)
Wulf, V., Müller, C., Pipek, V., Randall, D., Rohde, M., Stevens, G.: Practice-based computing: empirically grounded conceptualizations derived from design case studies. In: Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., Randall, D. (eds.) Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World. CSCW, pp. 111–150. Springer, London (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_7
Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., Stevens, G:. Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in cscw. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 505–512 (2011)
Yoshikawa, M., Matsumoto, Y., Sumitani, M., Ishiguro, H.: Development of an android robot for psychological support in medical and welfare fields. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 2378–2383 (2011)
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the participants, the reviewers and all other involved people. This paper is a shared result of all involved and we are thankful for the given support.
The Version of Record of this contribution is published in [insert volume title], and is available online at https://doi.org/ [insert DOI]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carros, F. et al. (2022). Not that Uncanny After All? An Ethnographic Study on Android Robots Perception of Older Adults in Germany and Japan. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)