Abstract
There is a growing interest in the integration of social robots in different applications in our daily lives. However, it can be challenging to design a social robot that is perceived positively among the target end-users. Psychometric scales can be used to give insights and assist in the designing of an acceptable social robot. In this study, the Greek adaptation of the Human-Robot Interaction Evaluation Scale (HRIES) has been considered to evaluate the attitude of children toward a developed social robot. Questionnaires were used to collect data from 40 neurotypical children before and after interacting with the social robot. The results showed no statistical differences due to gender. The analysis of the questionnaire scores revealed changes in the children’s perceptions after the session with the robot. This implies that direct interactions with a social robot helped in altering existing perceived attitudes toward social robots. Assessment tools, such as psychometric scales, are necessary to evaluate the acceptability of social robots.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alhaddad, A.Y., et al.: Sense and learn: recent advances in wearable sensing and machine learning for blood glucose monitoring and trend-detection. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 699 (2022)
Alhaddad, A.Y.: Toward 3D printed prosthetic hands that can satisfy psychosocial needs: grasping force comparisons between a prosthetic hand and human hands. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 304–313. Springer (2017)
Cabibihan, J.-J., Alhaddad, A.Y., Gulrez, T., Yoon, W.J.: Influence of visual and haptic feedback on the detection of threshold forces in a surgical grasping task. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6(3), 5525–5532 (2021)
Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H., et al.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2), 94–103 (2009)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, J.J., Bonarini, A.: Influence of reaction time in the emotional response of a companion robot to a child’s aggressive interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–13 (2020)
Katsanis, I.A., Moulianitis, V.C., Panagiotarakos, D.T.: Design, development, and a pilot study of a low-cost robot for child-robot interaction in autism interventions. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 6(6), 43 (2022)
Alban, A.Q., et al.: Detection of challenging behaviours of children with autism using wearable sensors during interactions with social robots. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 852–857. IEEE (2021)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, J.-J., Bonarini, A.: Real-time social robot’s responses to undesired interactions between children and their surroundings. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1–9 (2022)
Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.J.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005, pp. 465–468. IEEE (2005)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, J.-J., Hayek, A., Bonarini, A.: Safety experiments for small robots investigating the potential of soft materials in mitigating the harm to the head due to impacts. SN Appl. Sci. 1(5), 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0467-7
Begum, M., Serna, R.W., Yanco, H.A.: Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? a comprehensive review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8(2), 157–181 (2016)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, J.-J., Hayek, A., Bonarini, A.: Influence of the shape and mass of a small robot when thrown to a dummy human head. SN Appl. Sci. 1(11), 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1447-7
Bogue, R.: Rehabilitation robots. Ind. Robot Int. J. 45(3), 301–306 (2018)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, J.-J., Bonarini, A.: Recognition of aggressive interactions of children toward robotic toys. In: 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2019)
Cabibihan, J.J.: Social robots and wearable sensors for mitigating meltdowns in autism - a pilot test. In: Ge, S.S., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11357, pp. 103–114. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_11
Katsanis, I.A., Moulianitis, V.C.: An architecture for safe child-robot interactions in autism interventions. Robotics 10(1), 20 (2021)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, J.-J., Bonarini, A.: Head impact severity measures for small social robots thrown during meltdown in autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 11(2), 255–270 (2019)
Spatola, N., Kühnlenz, B., Cheng, G.: Perception and evaluation in human-robot interaction: the human-robot interaction evaluation scale (hries)-a multicomponent approach of anthropomorphism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 13(7), 1517–1539 (2021)
Alhaddad, A.Y., Mecheter, A., Wadood, M.A., Alsaari, A.S., Mohammed, H., Cabibihan, J.-J.: Anthropomorphism and its negative attitudes, sociability, animacy, agency, and disturbance requirements for social robots: a pilot study. In: Li, H., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 13086, pp. 791–796. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_73
Alhaddad, A.Y., Javed, H., Connor, O., Banire, B., Al Thani, D., Cabibihan, J.J.: Robotic trains as an educational and therapeutic tool for autism spectrum disorder intervention. In: International Conference on Robotics and Education RiE 2017, pp. 249–262. Springer (2018)
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009)
Carpinella, C.M., Wyman, A.W., Perez, M.A., Stroessner, S.J.: The robotic social attributes scale (rosas) development and validation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 254–262 (2017)
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Kato, K.: Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interact. Stud. 7(3), 437–454 (2006)
Peca, A., et al.: Robot enhanced therapy for children with autism disorders: measuring ethical acceptability. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 35(2), 54–66 (2016)
Sheba, J.K., Mohan, R.E., GarcĂa, E.A.M.: Easiness of acceptance metric for effective human robot interactions in therapeutic pet robots. In: 2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), pp. 150–155. IEEE (2012)
Young, J.E., Hawkins, R., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T.: Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 95–108 (2009)
Dang, J., Liu, L.: Robots are friends as well as foes: ambivalent attitudes toward mindful and mindless AI robots in the United States and China. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115, 106612 (2021)
Backonja, U., et al.: Comfort and attitudes towards robots among young, middle-aged, and older adults: a cross-sectional study. J. Nurs. Sch. 50(6), 623–633 (2018)
Paetzel, M., Perugia, G., Castellano, G.: The persistence of first impressions: the effect of repeated interactions on the perception of a social robot. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 73–82 (2020)
Tung, F.-W.: Influence of gender and age on the attitudes of children towards humanoid robots. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6764, pp. 637–646. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21619-0_76
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Katsanis, I., Alhaddad, A.Y., Cabibihan, JJ., Moulianitis, V. (2022). Children Perceived Perception of a Mini-Humanoid Social Robot Based on a Psychometric Scale: A Pilot Study in Greece. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)