Skip to main content

Reputation, Risk, and Trust on User Adoption of Internet Search Engines: The Case of DuckDuckGo

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2022)

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of end-user adoption of the DuckDuckGo search engine coupling the standard UTAUT model with factors to reflect reputation, risk, and trust. An experimental approach was taken to validate our model, where participants were exposed to the DuckDuckGo product using a vignette. Subsequently, answering questions on their perception of the technology. The data was analyzed using the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. From the nine distinct factors studied, we found that ‘Performance Expectancy’ played the greatest role in user decisions on adoption, followed by ‘Firm Reputation’, ‘Initial Trust in Technology’, ‘Social Influence’, and an individual’s ‘Disposition to Trust’. We conclude by exploring how these findings can explain DuckDuckGo’s rising prominence as a search engine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, K., Fraccastoro, K.: The effect of culture on user acceptance of information technology. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19, 522–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01923

  2. Bélanger, F., Carter, L.: Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 17(2), 165–176 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett, A.: A Baker’s Dozen of Tips for Better Web Searches. Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law (2020). https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=cle. Accessed 05 Apr 2022

  4. DuckDuckGo: DuckDuckGo Traffic. https://duckduckgo.com/traffic. Accessed 25 May 2022

  5. Duò, M.: 21 Alternative Search Engines to Use in 2022. https://kinsta.com/blog/alternative-search-engines/. Accessed 05 Apr 2022

  6. Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B.: A Primer for Soft Modeling. University of Akron Press, Ohio (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hair, J.F., et al.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19(2), 139–152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, G., et al.: Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Inf. Syst. J. 19(3), 283–311 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kite-Powell, J.: This New Privacy-First Search Engine Keeps Your Searches Private. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jenniferhicks/2020/02/12/this-new-privacy-first-search-engine-keeps-your-searches-private/. Accessed 28 Jan 2022

  10. Lancelot Miltgen, C., et al.: Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 103–114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010

  11. Oliveira, T., et al.: Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: when UTAUT meets TTF and ITM. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34(5), 689–703 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pasquale, F.: Privacy, antitrust, and power. George Mason Law Rev. 20(4), 1009–1024 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ringle, C.M., et al.: SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. (2015). https://www.smartpls.com/. Accessed 2 May 2022

  14. Saravanos, A., Zervoudakis, S., Zheng, D., Stott, N., Hawryluk, B., Delfino, D.: The hidden cost of using amazon mechanical Turk for research. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 13094, pp. 147–164. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90238-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Srite, M., Karahanna, E.: The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Q. 30(3), 679–704 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkatesh, V., et al.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuen, Y.: Internet banking acceptance in the United States and Malaysia: a cross-cultural examination. Mark. Intell. Plan. 33(3), 292–308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2013-0126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part through the New York University School of Professional Studies Full-Time Faculty Professional Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonios Saravanos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saravanos, A. et al. (2022). Reputation, Risk, and Trust on User Adoption of Internet Search Engines: The Case of DuckDuckGo. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1654. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19679-9_87

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19679-9_87

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19678-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19679-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics