Skip to main content

SurvAnnT: Facilitating Community-Led Scientific Surveys and Annotations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2022)

Abstract

A core research activity in many scientific domains concerns gathering data via questionnaire-based surveys. Meanwhile, annotation projects, that require input by field specialists, are invaluable in various research areas. Surveys and annotation projects share inherent similarities, since they both depend on participants who are prompted to answer a set of questions referring to particular artifacts (e.g., text segments). Both tasks are hindered by their dependence on volunteering, often requiring participants of a particular background, thus burdening research conductors to seek suitable ones. In this paper, we present SurvAnnT, a platform that facilitates the creation and management of surveys and annotation projects. SurvAnnT goes beyond existing tools offering customizable gamification aspects to motivate participation, as well as expert finding mechanisms to facilitate the identification of suitable participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    SurvAnnT: http://survannt.athenarc.gr.

  2. 2.

    Source code: https://github.com/athenarc/SurvAnnT.

  3. 3.

    Simple questionnaires are represented by null resources.

  4. 4.

    Qualtrics Survey: https://www.qualtrics.com/.

  5. 5.

    Amazon MTurk: https://www.mturk.com.

  6. 6.

    Premise: https://www.premise.com/.

  7. 7.

    Prolific: https://www.prolific.co/.

  8. 8.

    Doccano: https://doccano.herokuapp.com/.

  9. 9.

    Stall catchers: https://stallcatchers.com/about.

References

  1. Allen, I.E., Seaman, C.A.: Likert scales and data analyses. Qual. Prog. 40(7), 64–65 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chatzopoulos, S., Vergoulis, T., Dalamagas, T., Tryfonopoulos, C.: VeTo+: improved expert set expansion in academia. Int. J. Digit. Lib. 23(1), 57–75 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-021-00318-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaradeh, M.Y., et al.: Open research knowledge graph: next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2019, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, 19–21 November 2019, pp. 243–246 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3360901.3364435

  4. Manghi, P., Bardi, A., Atzori, C., Baglioni, M., Manola, N., Schirrwagen, J., Principe, P.: The OpenAIRE research graph data model (2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2643199

  5. Munro, R., et al.: Crowdsourcing and language studies: the new generation of linguistic data. In: NAACL Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data With Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, pp. 122–130. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nidy, D.R.: QuickData: online survey creation and data collection. In: EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, pp. 3493–3498. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nugent, J.: Game for good with stall catchers citizen science. Sci. Scope 42(7), 10–13 (2019). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26898936

  8. Symonds, E.: A practical application of SurveyMonkey as a remote usability-testing tool. Lib. Hi Tech (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 990–998. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, M., Peterson, G.M., Tenni, P.C., Bindoff, I.K.: A clinical knowledge measurement tool to assess the ability of community pharmacists to detect drug-related problems. Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 20(4), 238–248 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anargiros Tzerefos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tzerefos, A., Kanellos, I., Chatzopoulos, S., Dalamagas, T., Vergoulis, T. (2022). SurvAnnT: Facilitating Community-Led Scientific Surveys and Annotations. In: Silvello, G., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16802-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics