Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Recovered Memory Debate: Wins, Losses, and Creating Future Open-Minded Skeptics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Toward a Science of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Scott O. Lilienfeld was among the most influential clinical psychological scientists, avid promoters of psychological science, and stalwart and effective critics of pseudoscience in our time. We describe the role that Lilienfeld and other skeptical scientists played in the so-called “memory wars” that spanned more than three decades and continue to the present time. We outline the salient wins and losses for scientific skepticism in this debate regarding repressed and recovered memories of trauma, and we highlight the need for open, unfettered scientific inquiry, and free speech in academia and the broader psychological community. Such safeguards are vital for encouraging both young and established psychological scientists’ willingness to tackle controversial topics including dissociative amnesia and repressed memories. Wins include widespread dissemination of cautions regarding repressed and recovered memories and positive changes in clinical practices, whereas losses include the uncritical inclusion of dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder in influential diagnostic manuals, the motte-and-bailey technique to undermine skeptical perspectives, uncritical presentations regarding repressed memories in scientific journals, and non-scientific and problematic media coverage relevant to the debate. Losses imply an ongoing need to encourage the open-minded skepticism, intellectual courage, and epistemic humility that Scott exemplified, and to ensure adequate funding for work that deeply questions unexamined assumptions and controversial issues in psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This committee consists of investigative psychologists, sex crime investigators, and experts in memory, cognition, and psychopathology. The second author of this chapter is a member of this committee. The committee investigates cases involving, for example, recovered memories and claims of ritual abuse and provides advice to the Public Prosecution on what the next steps should be (e.g., stop the investigation).

References

  • Alpert, J. L. (1997). Unsubstantiated claims of false memory and essential responsibilities. American Psychologist, 52(9), 987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.9.987.a

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. C., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410(6826), 366–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, B., Morton, J., Bekerian, D. A., Brewin, C. R., Davies, G. M., & Mollon, P. (1995). The recovery of memories in clinical practice: Experiences and beliefs of British psychological society practitioners. Psychologist, 8(5), 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barden, R. C. (2016). Memory and reliability: Developments and controversial issues. In P. Radcliffe, A. Heaton-Armstrong, G. Gudjonsson, & D. Wolchover (Eds.), Witness Testimony in Sex Cases (pp. 343–359). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, L. M., Lynn, S. J., Vanderhoff, H., & Gidycz, C. (2004). Sexual assault revictimization: Toward effective risk-reduction programs. In L. J. Koenig, L. S. Doll, A. O’Leary, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child sexual abuse to adult sexual risk: Trauma, revictimization, and intervention (pp. 269–295). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10785-014

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, E. S. (1990). Secret survivors: Uncovering incest and its aftereffects in women. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P. (2021). My university sacrificed ideas for ideology. So today I quit. [Letter]. Common Sense: Bari Weiss’s Substack [Website]. https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/my-university-sacrificed-ideas-for?

  • Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., & Brams, J. S. (2017a). Assisting the courts in understanding and connecting with experiences of disconnection: Addressing trauma-related dissociation as a forensic psychologist, part I. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(4), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., Brams, J. S., & DiComo, R. A. (2017b). Assessing trauma-related dissociation in forensic contexts: Addressing trauma-related dissociation as a forensic psychologist, part II. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(4), 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R., Li, H., McNeilis, J., Ntarantana, V., & Unsworth, C. (2020). On repression, and avoiding red herrings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(10), 2001–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Psychology Society Research Board Working Group. (2008, June). Guidelines on memory and the law: Recommendations from the scientific study of human memory. British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2022). The importance of viewpoint diversity among scientific team members. Comment on Clark et al. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheit, R. E. (2022). Hyping Hypnosis: The Myth That Made Capturing the Friedmans Persuasive. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 23(2), 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., Costello, T., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. (2022). Keep your enemies close: Adversarial collaborations will improve empirical accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crews, F. C. (1995). The memory wars: Freud’s legacy in dispute. NY: New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, L. (2022). The Power of False Memory Rhetoric. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 23(2), 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardeña, E., et al. (2012). Evaluation of the Evidence for the Trauma and Fantasy Models of Dissociation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 550–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Reform Act. (1988). London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/40/contents

  • Felstead, K. (2022, April, 1). Address at the British false memory society annual meeting. Online virtual meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • FMSF. (2019). False Memory Syndrome Foundation [Website]. http://www.fmsfonline.org/

  • Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. (2021). Scholars Under Fire: 2021 Year in Review. https://www.thefire.org/research/publications/miscellaneous-publications/scholars-under-fire/scholars-under-fire-2021-year-in-review-full-text/

  • Freyd, J. J. (1994). Betrayal-trauma: Traumatic amnesia as an adaptive response to childhood abuse. Ethics & Behavior, 4, 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Council of the Netherlands. (2004). Disputed memories. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, publication no. 2004/02. http://dx.doi.org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.507

  • Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 138–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020). Microaggression research and application: Clarifications, corrections, and common ground. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (1998). Repressed memories and World War II: Some cautionary notes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(5), 471–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Kirsch, I., Sarbin, T. R., Lynn, S. J., Chaves, J. F., Ganaway, G. K., & Powell, R. A. (1999). Dissociative identity disorder and the sociocognitive model: Recalling the lessons of the past. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Lohr, J. M., & Lynn, S. J. (2003). Science and pseudoscience in contemporary clinical psychology. Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Ruscio, J., & Lynn, S. J. (Eds.). (2008). Navigating the mindfield: A guide to separating science from pseudoscience in mental health. Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, A. (1999). Recovered memories in the courts. In S. Taub (Ed.), Recovered memories of child sexual abuse: Psychological, social, and legal perspectives on a contemporary mental health controversy (pp. 165–210). Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48(5), 518–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. (2004). Dispatch from the (un) civil memory wars. The Lancet, 364, 20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (2013). How reliable is your memory? [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_loftus_how_reliable_is_your_memory.

  • Loftus, E. F., & Davis, D. (2006). Recovered memories. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 469–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, S. J., Aksen, D., Sleight, F., Polizzi, C., Moretti, L. S., & Medrano, L. A. (in press). Combating pseudoscience in clinical psychology: From the scientific mindset to busting myths, to prescriptive remedies. In C. Cobb, W. O’Donohue, & S. J. Lynn (Eds.), Toward a science of clinical psychology: A tribute to the life and work of Scott O. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, S. J., & Baltman, J. (2016). Recovered memories. In N. Naples (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Merckelbach, H., Giesbrecht, T., McNally, R. J., Loftus, E. F., et al. (2014). The trauma model of dissociation: Inconvenient truths and stubborn fictions. Comment on Dalenberg et al. (2012). Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, S. J., Maxwell, R., Merckelbach, H., Lilienfeld, S. O., van Heugten-van der Kloet, D., & Miskovic, V. (2019). Dissociation and its disorders: Competing models, future directions, and a way forward. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, S. J., Polizzi, C., Merckelbach, H., Chiu, C. D., Maxwell, R., van Heugten, D., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2022). Dissociation and dissociative disorders reconsidered: Beyond sociocognitive and trauma models toward a transtheoretical framework. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangiulli, I., Otgaar, H., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2022). A critical review of case studies on dissociative amnesia. Clinical Psychological Science, 10(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P. R. (2006). The mind has mountains: Reflections on society and psychiatry. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (2003a). Recovering memories of trauma: A view from the laboratory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (2003b). Remembering trauma. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (2012). Searching for repressed memory. In R. F. Belli (Ed.), True and false recovered memories: Toward a reconciliation of the debate (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation) (Vol. 58, pp. 121–147). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (2022). Are memories of sexual trauma fragmented? Memory, 30(1), 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Berntsen, C., Brewin, C. R., & Rubin, D. C. (2022). Are memories of sexual trauma fragmented? A post publication discussion among Richard J. McNally, Dorthe Berntsen, Chris R. Brewin, and David C. Rubin. Memory. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2022.2061135.

  • Merckelbach, H., & Patihis, L. (2018). Why “trauma-related dissociation” is a misnomer in courts: A critical analysis of Brand et al. (2017a, b). Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohajerin, B., Lynn, S. J., Bakhtiyari, M., & Dolatshah, B. (2020). Evaluating the unified protocol in the treatment of dissociative identify disorder. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 27(3), 270–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Jersey v. Henderson. (2011). A-8-08 (062218). https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/2011/a-8-08-1-opn.html

  • Nierop, N. (2022, March). Netherlands expert committee for equivocal sexual abuse allegations. Presentation at the annual LEBZ meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierop, N., van den Eshof, P., & Brandt, C. (2021). A practical approach to sexual abuse allegations: Netherlands Expert Committee for Equivocal Sexual Abuse Allegations (pp. 1–13). Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., & Fisher, J. E. (2022). Are illiberal acts unethical? APA’s Ethics Code and the protection of free speech. American Psychologist, 77(8), 875–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000995

  • Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., & Patihis, L. (2022). What science tells us about false and repressed memories. Memory, 30(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Patihis, L., Merckelbach, H., Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (2019). The return of the repressed: The persistent and problematic claims of long-forgotten trauma. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1072–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patihis, L., & Pendergrast, M. H. (2019). Reports of recovered memories of abuse in therapy in a large age-representative US national sample: Therapy type and decade comparisons. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patihis, L., Ho, L. Y., Tingen, I. W., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (2014). Are the “memory wars” over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory. Psychological Science, 25(2), 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignotti, M. (2020). SSCPnet listserve controversy. Potentially Harmful and Other Questionable Therapies [Website]. https://phtherapies.wordpress.com/2020/06/22/sscpnet-listserve-controversy/

  • Pluckrose, H., & Lindsay, J. (2020). Cynical theories: How activist scholarship made everything about race, gender, and identity – And why this harms everybody. Pitchstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (1906). Hysteria from the point of view of dissociated personality. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1(4), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 22–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoboria, A., Wade, K. A., Lindsay, D. S., Azad, T., Strange, D., Ost, J., & Hyman, I. E. (2017). A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies. Memory, 25(2), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, N. P. (1994). Multiple identity enactments and multiple personality disorder: A sociocognitive perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State v. Clarence M. Moore. (2006). A-38-2003. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/2006/a-38-03-doc.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Portsmouth University, Portsmouth, UK

    Lawrence Patihis

  2. Catholic University of Leuven, Brussels, Belgium

    Henry Otgaar

  3. Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

    Henry Otgaar

  4. Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY, USA

    Steven Jay Lynn

  5. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Elizabeth F. Loftus

  6. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Richard J. McNally

Authors
  1. Lawrence Patihis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henry Otgaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven Jay Lynn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth F. Loftus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard J. McNally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Patihis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development and Family Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA

    Cory L. Cobb

  2. Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA

    Steven Jay Lynn

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA

    William O’Donohue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Patihis, L., Otgaar, H., Lynn, S.J., Loftus, E.F., McNally, R.J. (2022). The Recovered Memory Debate: Wins, Losses, and Creating Future Open-Minded Skeptics. In: Cobb, C.L., Lynn, S.J., O’Donohue, W. (eds) Toward a Science of Clinical Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14332-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation