Skip to main content

Comparison of Interpolation Methods for MRI Images Acquired with Different Matrix Sizes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology in Biomedicine (ITIB 2022)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1429))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Magnetic resonance is one of the most comprehensive and safe radiological techniques. However, a serious limitation is signal strength because it is inversely proportional to image resolution. One of the most important parameters which determines signal-to-resolution ratio is matrix size, therefore a post-processing technique which allows the best-possible resolution to be obtained is desired. This paper concerns a study whose main goal was to evaluate seventeen popular interpolation methods and select the one that best estimates human tissues when enlarging MRI images. The experiment was conducted using data from twenty left shoulder MRI scans from different patients. In order to compare interpolation methods, lower-resolution images were upsampled to higher-resolution images, after which the quality of each method was checked using the structural similarity index measure and mean square error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Conejero, J.: Interpolation algorithms in pixinsight (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Getreuer, P.: Linear methods for image interpolation. Image Process. Line 1, 238–259 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hisham, M., Yaakob, S.N., Raof, R., Nazren, A., Wafi, N.: An analysis of performance for commonly used interpolation method. Adv. Sci. Lett. 23(6), 5147–5150 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter, J.D.: Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9(03), 90–95 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokeny, P., Cheng, Y.C.N., Xie, H.: A study of MRI gradient echo signals from discrete magnetic particles with considerations of several parameters in simulations. Magnet. Reson. Imaging 48, 129–137 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuo, F.F., Kaiser, J.F.: System Analysis by Digital Computer. Wiley (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Limongelli, M., Carvelli, V.: Damage localization in a glass fiber reinforced composite plate via the surface interpolation method. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 628, p. 012095. IOP Publishing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mohan, P.G., Prakash, C., Gangashetty, S.V.: Bessel transform for image resizing. In: 2011 18th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Plenge, E., et al.: Super-resolution methods in MRI: can they improve the trade-off between resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and acquisition time? Magnet. Reson. Med. 68(6), 1983–1993 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Podder, P., Khan, T.Z., Khan, M.H., Rahman, M.M.: Comparative performance analysis of hamming, hanning and blackman window. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 96(18) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sara, U., Akter, M., Uddin, M.S.: Image quality assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR- a comparative study. J. Comput. Commun. 7(3), 8–18 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seta, R., Okubo, K., Tagawa, N.: Digital image interpolation method using higher-order hermite interpolating polynomials with compact finite-difference. In: Proceedings: APSIPA ASC 2009: Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association, 2009 Annual Summit and Conference, pp. 406–409. Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, J.O.: Spectral Audio Signal Processing. W3K (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Twigg, C.: Catmull-rom splines. Computer 41(6), 4–6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The data acquisition was carried out based on the consent of the Jagiellonian University’s Bioethics Committee (No 155/KBL/OIL/2017, 22.09.2017).

This work was financed by the AGH University of Science and Technology thanks to the Rector’s Grant 18/GRANT/2022.

This work was co-financed by the AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of EAIIB, KBIB no 16.16.120.773.

Work carried out within the grant Studenckie Koła tworzą innowacje - II edition, project no. SKN/SP/535131/2022 entitled “Cephalometric image reconstruction based on magnetic resonance imaging".

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Piórkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cieślak, A., Piórkowski, A., Obuchowicz, R. (2022). Comparison of Interpolation Methods for MRI Images Acquired with Different Matrix Sizes. In: Pietka, E., Badura, P., Kawa, J., Wieclawek, W. (eds) Information Technology in Biomedicine. ITIB 2022. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1429. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09135-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics