Skip to main content

Formal Epistemology Meets a Coronavirus: Rational Decision and the Response to Covid-19

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Public Health Policy Within Pandemics

Part of the book series: The International Library of Bioethics ((ILB,volume 95))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

Techniques from formal epistemology can be used to provide decision support during the formulation of societal policy responses to pandemics such as Covid-19. The complexity of these decisions arises from multiple sources including incompatible values of stakeholders. These differences in values result in conflicting objectives which can be studied using formal multicriteria decision analysis. An important component of multicriteria analysis is the construction of an objectives hierarchy (OH) to represent the conflicting values. This paper points out the benefits of constructing such a hierarchy through public deliberation. It shows all stakeholders where tradeoffs must be made between divergent values such as halting disease spread and unfettered economic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow, K.J., and H. Raynaud. 1986. Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, P. 2021. Fighting the First Wave: Why the Coronavirus Was Tackled so Differently across the Globe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baraniuk, C. 2021. What Do We Know About China’s Covid-19 Vaccines? British Medical Journal 373: n912. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n912.

  • Bellman, R.E. 1961. Adaptive Control Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cesta, A., G. Cortellessa, and R. de Benedictis. 2014. Training for Crisis Decision Making—An Approach Based on Plan Adaptation. Knowledge-Based Systems 58: 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. 2021. Chinese Authorities Admit Improper Response to Coronavirus Whistleblower. National Public Radio 19 March: https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/19/818295972/chinese-authorities-admit-improper-response-to-coronavirus-whistleblower; last accessed 17-May-2021.

  • Crow, J.F. 1995. Quarreling Geneticists and a Diplomat. Genetics 140: 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duddy, C., and Piggins, A. 2020. Arrow’s Theorem. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore9780190228637-e-936; last accessed 18-June-2021.

  • Figuera, J., S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, eds. 2005. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, L., E. Dong, K. Khan, and S. Sarkar. 2020. Persistence of US Measles Risk Due to Vaccine Hesitancy and Outbreaks Abroad. Lancet Infectious Diseases 20: 1114–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey, M., and D.S. Johnson. 1979. Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A., 2020. Li Wenliang. Lancet 395: 682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. 1994. Coalition Structures. In Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 2, ed. R.J. Aumann and S. Hart, 1305–1337. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. 2020. The Covid-19 Catastrophe: What’s Gone Wrong and How to Stop It Happening Again. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S., W. Xuetong, T. Hussain, A.H. Khoja, and M.Z. Zia. 2021. Assessing the impact of COVID19 and safety parameters on energy project performance with an Analytical Hierarchy Process. Utilities Policy 70: 101210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J.P., S. Cripps, and M.A. Tanner. 2020. Forecasting for COVID-19 has Failed. International Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N.R., Z.U. Qureshi, R.J. Temple, J.P. Larwood, T. Greenhalgh, and L. Bourouiba. 2020. Two Metres or One: What is the Evidence for Physical Distancing in Covid-19? British Medical Journal 370: 3223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., and S. Xia. 2020. Computational Epidemiology: From Disease Transmission Modeling to Vaccination Decision Making. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loades, M.E., E. Chatburn, N. Higson-Sweeney, S. Reynolds, R. Shafran, A. Brigden, C. Linney, M.N. McManus, C. Borwick, and E. Crawley. 2020. Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 59: 1218-1239.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H.E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, L.A. 1996. Making the Role of Values in Conservation Explicit. Conservation Biology 10: 914–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahato, R., G. Nimasow, O.D. Nimasow, and D. Bushi. 2020. Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Potential Risk Zonation of COVID-19 in India. Journal of the Social Sciences 48: 4223–4238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, L., and Puertas, R. 2021. European Countries’ Vulnerability to COVID-19: Multicriteria Decisionmaking Techniques. Economic Research–Ekonomska Istra˘zivanja 2021: Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1874462.

  • Moffett, A., J.S. Dyer, and S. Sarkar. 2006. Integrating Biodiversity Representation with Multiple Criteria in North-Central Namibia Using Non-Dominated Alternatives and a Modified Analytic Hierarchy Process. Biological Conservation 129: 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, A., and S. Sarkar. 2006. Incorporating Multiple Criteria into the Design of Conservation Area Networks: A Minireview with Recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raboisson, D., and G. Lhermie. 2020. Living with COVID-19: A Systemic and Multi-Criteria Approach to Enact Evidence-Based Health Policy. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselli, L.R.P., E.A. Frej, R.J.P. Ferreira, A.R. Alberti, and A.T. de Almeida. 2020. Utility Based Multicriteria Model for Screening Patients Under the COVID-19 Pandemic. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2020: 9391251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 2012. Complementarity and the Selection of Nature Reserves: Algorithms and the Origins of Conservation Planning, 1980–1995. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 66: 397–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. 2018. Deliberative Decisions and Formal Multicriteria Analysis: Addressing Norton’s Skepticism. In A Sustainable Philosophy: The Work of Bryan Norton, Sarkar, S. and Minteer, B. Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 213‒236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., and J. Garson. 2004. Multiple Criterion Synchronization for Conservation Area Network Design: The Use of Non-Dominated Alternative Sets. Conservation and Society 2: 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., and T. Uebel. 2015. Formal Epistemology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53: 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., A. Zlojutro, K. Khan, and L. Gardner. 2019. Measles Resurgence in the USA: How International Travel Compounds Vaccine Resistance. Lancet Infectious Diseases 19: 684–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simandan, D. 2018. Rethinking the Health Consequences of Social Class and Social Mobility. Social Science and Medicine 200: 258–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. 2020. Governments Cannot Just ‘Follow the Science’ on COVID-19. Nature Human Behavior 4: 560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0894-x.

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. 2005. Strengthening health security by implementing the International Health Regulations. https://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/pheic/en/; last accessed 17-May2021.

  • World Health Organization [WHO]. 2020. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19, 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/whodirector-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020; last accessed 17-May-2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahotra Sarkar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sarkar, S. (2022). Formal Epistemology Meets a Coronavirus: Rational Decision and the Response to Covid-19. In: Boylan, M. (eds) Ethical Public Health Policy Within Pandemics. The International Library of Bioethics, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99692-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics