Skip to main content

The Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers on the Use of Mobile Technology: A Naturalistic Inquiry in Zimbabwe

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information and Communication (FICC 2022)

Abstract

This research is an inquiry into the (under)utilisation of mobile phones by smallholder farmers in their agricultural activities in Zimbabwe. Through a naturalistic enquiry, the research established that agricultural extension officers are vital in the adoption and use of mobile phones for agricultural purposes. Those extension officers who were not skilled in productively using mobile phone technology had technophobia, which was the primary reason they did not use the technology in their interactions with farmers. Yet, a sizeable number of farmers used their mobile phones to receive information from agricultural extension officers, officials, other farmers, and market vendors. Interviewed farmers perceived the mobile phone as a tool for education in agricultural matters. However, very few used their phones effectively for agricultural purposes. The research identified two main inhibitors to the acceptance and use of mobile phones by farmers: a lack of the necessary digital skills, and lacking information to use mobile phones. Other inhibiting factors included semi-literacy, old age, insufficient infrastructure, socioeconomic status, excessive cost, and lack of support from telecommunications companies and other service providers. This research contributes a novel perspective to the body of knowledge regarding mobile technology adoption for agricultural activity in marginalised communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kemp, S.: Digital in Zimbabwe: All the statistics you need in 2021 — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights (2021). https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-zimbabwe. Accessed 02 June 2021

  2. Musungwini, S.: Mobile phone use by Zimbabwean smallholder farmers: a baseline study. Afr. J. Inf. Commun. 22, 29–52 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou, M., Herselman, M., Coleman, A.: USSD technology a low cost asset in complementing public health workers’ work processes. In: Ortuño, F., Rojas, I. (eds.) IWBBIO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9044, pp. 57–64. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16480-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsokota, T., Von Solms, R., Van Greunen, D.: An ICT strategy for the sustainable development of the tourism sector in a developing country: a case study of Zimbabwe. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 78(1), 1–20 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Musungwini, S., Van Zyl, I.: Mobile technology for development experiences from Zimbabwe vending markets: a naturalistic enquiry. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 6(1), 101–111 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Bank Report: ICT in agriculture: Connecting smallholders to knowledge, networks, and institutions. World, no. 64605, p. 424 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal, S.: Role of mobile phone-enabled climate information services in gender-inclusive agriculture. Gender Technol. Dev. 20(2), 200–217 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Misaki, E., Apiola, M., Gaiani, S., Tedre, M.: Challenges facing sub-Saharan small-scale farmers in accessing farming information through mobile phones: a systematic literature review. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 84(4), 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wyche, S., Steinfield, C.: Why don’t farmers use cell phones to access market prices? Technology affordances and barriers to market information services adoption in rural Kenya. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(2), 320–333 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nyamba, S.Y.: Information in Tanzania: The roles of different stakeholders. Sokoine University, Morogoro (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Masuka, B., et al.: Mobile phone use by small-scale farmers: a potential to transform production and marketing in Zimbabwe. South Afr. J. Agric. Extension 44(2), 121–135 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mansingh, P., Erena, F.A.: Impact of mobile phone technology on agriculture and rural development: an analysis. Int. J. Curr. Res. 8(5), 31311–31317 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mittal, S., Mehar, M.: How mobile phones contribute to growth of small farmers? Evidence from India. Q. J. Int. Agric. 51(3), 227–244 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pikirayi, T.: The status of mobile penetration and active mobile subscriptions in Zimbabwe (Potraz 2017 Q3 Report) – Techzim. https://www.techzim.co.zw/2017/12/the-status-of-mobile-penetration-and-active-mobile-subscriptions-in-zimbabwe-potraz-2017-q3-report/. Accessed 06 July 2018

  15. Narasimhan, N., Leblois, A.: Making mobile phones and services accessible for persons with disabilities. https://g3ict.org/publication/making-mobile-phones-and-services-accessible-for-persons-with-disabilities. Accessed 30 Aug 2021

  16. Musungwini, S.: A model for harnessing the power of the mobile phone technology to improve smallholder agriculture in Zimbabwe. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on M4D Mobile Communication Technology for Development: M4D 2016, General Tracks, pp. 237–252 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rapsomanikis, G.: The economic lives of smallholder farmers. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moyo, S.: The political economy of land acquisition and redistribution in Zimbabwe, 1990–1999. J. South Afr. Stud. 26(1), 5–28 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moyo, S.: A review of Zimbabwean agricultural sector following the implementation of the land reform Overall impacts of Fast Track Land Reform Programme. Agricultural Department of Technical Extension Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chisita, C.T., Malapela, T.: Towards mobile agricultural information systems in Zimbabwean libraries: challenges and opportunities for small scale farmers in utilizing ICTs for sustainable food production. Agric. Inf. Worldwide 6, 58–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bagazonzya, H., Safdar, Z., Sen, S.: Broadening smallholders’ access to financial services through ICT. World Bank, Geneva (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kavoi, J.M., Mwangi, J.G., Kamau, G.M.: Challenges faced by small land holder farmer regarding decision making in innovative agricultural development: an empirical analysis from Kenya. Int. J. Agric. Extension 2(2), 101–108 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quandt, A., et al.: Mobile phone use is associated with higher smallholder agricultural productivity in Tanzania East, Africa. PLoS One 15(8), e0237337 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Napier, N.P., Dekhane, S., Smith, S.: Transitioning to blended learning: understanding student and faculty perceptions. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 15(1), 20–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ioana-Alexandra, T., Camelia, S., Laura, D.: Towards accessibility in education through smart speakers. An ontology based approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 192, 883–892 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krouska, A., Troussas, C., Sgouropoulou, C.: Mobile game-based learning as a solution in COVID-19 era: modeling the pedagogical affordance and student interactions. Educ. Inf. Technol. 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10672-3

  27. Papakostas, C., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Sgouropoulou, C.: Measuring user experience, usability and interactivity of a personalized mobile augmented reality training system. Sensors 21(11) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113888

  28. Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Alepis, E., Virvou, M.: Intelligent and adaptive tutoring through a social network for higher education. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 26(3–4), 138–167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2021.1908436

  29. Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Virvou, M.: NLP-based error analysis and dynamic motivation techniques in mobile learning. In: 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications IISA 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2019.8900729

  30. Ogbeide, I., Ele, O.A., Ogbeide, O.A., Service, A., Herdsmen, F.: Smallholder farmers and mobile phone technology in sub-Sahara Agriculture. Mayfair J. Inf. Technol. Manag. Agric. 1(1), 1–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mutami, C.: Smallholder agriculture production in Zimbabwe: a survey. J. Sustain. Dev. 14(2), 140–157 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anseeuw, W., Kapuya, T., Saruchera, D.: Zimbabwe’s agricultural reconstruction: Present state, ongoing projects and prospects for reinvestment. Development Bank of Southern Africa, Halfway House (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Etwire, P.M., et al.: An assessment of mobile phone based dissemination of weather and market information in the Upper West Region of Ghana. Agric. Food Secur. 6(8), 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pickens, J.: Attitudes and perceptions. In: Borkowski, N. (ed.) Organisational Behaviour Management in Health Care, pp. 43–75. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Salisbury (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mbele-Sibotshiwe, T.: A study of the perceptions and adoption of mobile payment platforms by entrepreneurs in Zimbabwe’s informal economy. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nunkoo, R.: Toward a more comprehensive use of social exchange theory to study residents’ attitudes to tourism. Procedia Econ. Financ. 39, 588–596 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harden, G., Boakye, K.G., Ryan, S.: Turnover intention of technology professionals: a social exchange theory perspective. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 58(4), 291–300 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas, D.R.: A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. Popul. Engl. Ed. 27(2), 237–246 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boyatzis, R.E.: Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Khan, S.N.: Qualitative research method: grounded theory. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 9(11), 224 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kroeze, J.H.: Postmodernism, interpretivism, and formal ontologies. In: Mora, M., et al. (eds.) Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems, pp. 43–45. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Williams, M.: Interpretivism and generalisation. J. Br. Sociol. Assoc. 34(2), 209–224 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Goldkuhl, G.: Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 135–146 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Woods, M.: Interviewing for research and analysing qualitative data: an overview, pp. 1–8. Massey University, New Zealand (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Boyce, C., Associate, E.: Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews. Evaluation 2, 1–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Collector, D., Module, F.G.: Qualitative research methods overview. In: Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Filed Guide, January 2005, pp. 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lincoln, Y.S., Lincoln, E.G.G.: Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Given, L.M.: Naturalistic inquiry. In: Encyclopaedia of Research Design. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Athens, L.: Naturalistic inquiry in theory and practice. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 39(1), 87–125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G.: Criteria for assessing naturalistic inquiries as reports. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, p. 26 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E., Pedersen, H.N.: Usefulness and self-expressiveness: extending TAM to explain the adoption of a mobile parking service. In: 16th Bled e-Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 705–717 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E., Thorbjernsen, H.: Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 33, 330 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Nabavi, A., Taghavi-Fard, M.T., Hanafizadeh, P., Taghva, M.R.: Information technology continuance intention: a systematic literature review. Int. J. e-Bus. Res. 12(1), 58–95 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Khan, N.A., Qijie, G., Ali, S., Shahbaz, B., Shah, A.A.: Farmers’ use of mobile phone for accessing agricultural information in Pakistan: a case of Punjab province. Cienc. Rural 49(10), 1–12 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work is based on research supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Number 132180) and the University of South Africa’s Research Professor Support Program. The grant holder acknowledges that options, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed are that of the authors and that the NRF/Unisa accepts no liability whatsoever in this regard. We would like to thank the editors, program chairs and reviewers for their feedback that guided us to improve the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Musungwini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Musungwini, S., van Zyl, I., Kroeze, J.H. (2022). The Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers on the Use of Mobile Technology: A Naturalistic Inquiry in Zimbabwe. In: Arai, K. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 439. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98015-3_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics