Skip to main content

Power, Vulnerability, and the Effects of COVID-19 on Migrants Held by the Detention Industry in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Global and Social Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Justice ((JUST,volume 1212))

Abstract

Violations of the human rights of migrants start with a policy of widespread detention, followed by degrading conditions in detention centers, which are gravely impacted by COVID-19, adding to a picture of systemic breaches of human rights. The detention of migrants in privatized detention centers leads to questions regarding human rights, ethics, and responsibility. For migrants held in detention centers, public health and containment related measures for COVID-19 are largely outside of their control and left in the hands of the detention industry, raising questions of power and vulnerability. COVID-19 intensifies an already precarious situation, amplifying vulnerabilities and experiences of harm by detained migrants. This article begins by describing main challenges to the human rights of migrants and asylum seekers held by the migrant detention industry. The article questions the structural conditions that are given and the hegemonic conceptions that have been formed against processes of naming and symbolically subordinating the other (Butler, Restaging the universal: hegemony and the limits of formalism. In: Butler J, Laclau E, Žižek S (eds) Contingency, hegemony, universality: contemporary dialogues on the left. London, Verso, pp 11–43, 2000). Special focus is given to the interplay between politics/public sector and business/private sector and their exercise of power over migrants. This is framed in light of Gilson and Butler’s understanding of the relational nature of situational vulnerability. The article concludes with a discussion exploring the social consequences of COVID-19 in the case of migrant detention in the US and the interplay of power and vulnerability, with a focus on justice. The discussion is framed with consideration for the privatized nature of the detention industry, which leads to the question of responsibility of the state versus private institutions in ensuring the safety of detained migrants during a global pandemic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This includes companies such as the GEO Group (GEO), CoreCivic, Management & Training Corporation (MTC), LaSalle Corrections (LaSalle), Caliburn International (Caliburn), and Immigration Centers of America (ICA).

  2. 2.

    These include, among others, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ICCPR, the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. Specifically, the right to liberty and security of person is recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 3), the ICCPR (Article 9, 10), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 37(b)-(d)), the American Convention on Human Rights (Article 7) (UN General Assembly 2017; UN Human Rights Council 2020).

  3. 3.

    For more examples of gaps between policy and practice see Urdaneta v. Keeton (Case No. CV-20-00654-PHX-SPL (JFM)) and O.M.G. v. Wolf (Civil Action No. 20-786 (JEB)).

  4. 4.

    Executive Order 14006 of January 26, 2021. Reforming Our Incarceration System to Eliminate the Use of Privately Operated Criminal Detention Facilities.

  5. 5.

    Including the Committee on the Protection of Migration Workers and their Families; the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (see CAT/OP/10); and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (see CERD/C/GRC/CO/20-22, para. 23; CERD/C/ESP/CO/21-23, para. 22; and CERD/C/NOR/CO/21-22, para. 36).

  6. 6.

    ‘American’ is used here to denote US citizens, but is used in quotes as many of the migrants in detention centers come from the Americas.

  7. 7.

    One of these corporations in the USA is the GEO Group, which has spent millions of dollars in lobbying and donations, mostly to members of the Republican Party (https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/geo-group/summary?id=D000022003)

References

  • ABC News. 2021. TRANSCRIPT: ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos Interviews President Joe Biden. ABC News, March 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2000. Restaging the Universal: Hegemony and the Limits of Formalism. In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, ed. Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek, 11–43. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Frames of War. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020a. Judith Butler: On COVID-19, the Politics of Non-Violence, Necropolitics, and Social Inequality. Verso (versobooks.com).

  • ———. 2020b. The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay. 2016. Introduction. In Vulnerability in Resistance, ed. Judith Butler, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay, 1–11. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling, Jørgen. 2017. Refugee Advocacy and the Meaning of ‘Migrants’. PRIO Policy Brief, 2. Oslo: PRIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, Felicia O., Alice Hamblett, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein, and Kathryn M. Nowotny. 2021. Epidemiology of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Detention Facilities. JAMA Network Open 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34409.

  • Center for International Human Rights. 2020. Report on the Role of Private Security Companies in Migrant Detention in the U.S. and Their Impact on the Protection of the Rights of Migrants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, Sumana. 2019. Invited Article: “You Are Not Welcome Here!” Understanding News Coverage of Central American Migrant Families in Trump’s America. Journal of Family Communication 19 (3): 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2019.1632866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Aviva. 2014. Undocumented: How Immigration Became Illegal. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney, Matthew G.T., and Ramon Garibaldo Valdez. 2021. Compounding Racialized Vulnerability: COVID-19 in Prisons, Jails, and Migrant Detention Centers. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 46. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9156019.

  • Erfani, Parsa, Nishant Uppal, Caroline H. Lee, Ranit Mishori, and Katherine R. Peeler. 2021. COVID-19 Testing and Cases in Immigration Detention Centers, April-August 2020. JAMA 325 (2): 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.21473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, Paddy. 2021. Toward a Critical Race Analysis of the COVID-19 Crisis in US Carceral Institutions. Critical Social Policy 42. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183211001495.

  • Freedom for Immigrants. 2019. Done with Detention: An Overview of Mapping Immigrant Detention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Erinn. 2011. Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression. Hypatia 26 (2): 308–332. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Erinn C. 2014. The Ethics of Vulnerability: A Feminist Analysis of Social Life and Practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Erinn. 2016. The Perils and Privileges of Vulnerability: Intersectionality, Relationality, and the Injustices of the U.S. Prison Nation. Philosophia 6 (1): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2016.0011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Erinn Cunniff. 2018. Beyond Bounded Selves and Places: The Relational Making of Vulnerability and Security. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 49 (3): 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2018.1434972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, James. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ICE. 2017. ICE ERO Immigration Arrests Climb Nearly 40%. https://www.ice.gov/features/100-days. Accessed 15 Feb 2021.

  • ———. 2021a. ICE Detainee Statistics. https://www.ice.gov/coronavirus#statements. Accessed 11 Oct 2021.

  • ———. 2021b. Judicial Releases. https://www.ice.gov/coronavirus#judRe. Accessed 7 May 2021.

  • Ignatieff, Michael. 2009. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IACHR (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights). 2020. Resolution 41/2020. Precautionary measure No. 265-20. Northwest Detention Center Regarding the United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Detention Coalition. 2020. IDC Briefing Note: An Overview of Promising Alternatives to Detention in the Era of COVID-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM (International Organization for Migration). 2019. Glossary on Migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM. 2020. World Migration Report 2020. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvalvaag, Alyssa Marie. 2021. Annex: Legal Frameworks for Refugee Protection in Latin America. In Latin America and Refugee Protection: Regimes, Logics and Challenges, ed. Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Marcia Vera Espinoza, and Gabriela Mezzanotti. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeth, Adam. 2004. Privatising Human Rights: What Happens to the State’s Human Rights Duties When Services are Privatised? Melbourne Journal of International Law 5 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotti, Gabriela. 2018. Entre non-entrée e non-refoulement: uma análise crítica do discurso norueguês em sua atual gestão migratória (Between non-entree and non-refoulement: a critical analysis of the Norwegian discourse in its current migration governance). In Migrantes forçados: conceitos e contextos, ed. Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Fernanda de Magalhães, Dias Frinhani, and Rachel de Oliveira Lopes, 507–531. Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. What is Left for ‘Us and Them’? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Criminalization of Humanitarian Aid for People on the Move. In Society, Culture and Frontiers: Interdisciplinary Approaches, ed. Fábio Lopes Alves, Eduardo Barros Portanova, and Silvana Aparecida de Souza. CRV Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, Michel. 2020. Sanitary Crisis, Civilizational Crisis. Space and Culture 23 (3): 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331220938617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Holly Ventura, Melissa Ripepi, Amy M. Ernstes, and Anthony A. Peguero. 2020. Immigration Policy and Justice in the Era of COVID-19. American Journal of Criminal Justice 45: 793–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09544-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights). 2011. Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. New York: United Nations. (Report No. HR/PUB/11/04).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheindorf, Marcus, and Ruth Wodak. 2018. Borders, Fences, and Limits - Protecting Austria from Refugees: Metadiscursive Negotiation of Meaning in the Current Refugee Crisis. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16 (1-2): 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheindorf, Markus, and Ruth Wodak, eds. 2020. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Migration Control: Language Policy, Identity and Belonging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Adrianna. 2020. ‘A Stain on Our Country’: ICE Efforts to Stop COVID-19 Spread Fail to Protect Immigrant Detainees from Virus. USA Today, 11 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2020. A Cruel Pedagogia Do Virus. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, Jeff. 2018. Office of the Attorney General, Memorandum from the Attorney General to the Federal Prosecutors Along the Southwest Border. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1049751/download. Accessed 02 Feb 2021.

  • Slack, Jeremy, and Josiah Heyman. 2020. Asylum and Mass Detention and the U.S.-Mexico Border During COVID-19. Journal of Latin American Geography 19 (3): 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2020.0057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on Migrant Workers. 2020. General Comment No. 5 (2020) on Migrants’ Rights to Liberty and Freedom from Arbitrary Detention (Report No. CMW/C/32/R.2).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. 2017. Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Rights of Peoples to Self-Determination (Report No. A/72/286).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Council. 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, François Crépeau (Report No. A/HRC/20/24).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, François Crépeau (Report No. A/HRC/29/36).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Resolution 33/4. The Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination (Resolution No. A/HRC/RES/33/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Report of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination (Report No. A/HRC/36/47).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders Working on the Rights of People on the Move.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Impact of the Use of Private Military and Security Services in Immigration and Border Management on the Protection of the Rights of all Migrants (Report No. A/HRC/45/9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our gratitude to the editor Gottfried Schweiger and fellow participants at the workshop Ethical Perspectives on the Social and Economic Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic at the Centre for Ethics and Poverty Research (CEPR), University of Salzburg for their thoughtful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We would also like to thank William Bülow at Stockholm University and Ådne Valen-Sendstad at the Research Group in Human Rights and Diversities, University of South-Eastern Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela Mezzanotti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mezzanotti, G., Kvalvaag, A.M. (2022). Power, Vulnerability, and the Effects of COVID-19 on Migrants Held by the Detention Industry in the United States. In: Schweiger, G. (eds) The Global and Social Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Studies in Global Justice, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97982-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics