Skip to main content

Abstract

For travel within urban and rural areas, there is a compelling case for policy makers to encourage a transition from using personal vehicles towards low emission rail. Although trains are often seen as a ‘green’ mode of transport, they represent ~ 9% of global passenger movement and only consume ~ 0.6% of global oil, therefore it remains important to consider methods for emission reduction. Without improvements to the current rolling stock, as well as the tracks and platforms, emissions could remain static at best. Electric trains (ETs) produce the lowest levels of emissions when compared to conventionally fuelled trains (CFTs) and hydrogen trains (HTs). However, emissions remain dependent on the electricity generation mix, and it is likely that in the future a combination of both HTs and ETs will be required to travel within urban and rural areas. For trains to be considered a real alternative to personal vehicles and support the broader objectives of integrated transport, early investment into new rolling stock will be required. This is particularly important as the average life of a train is ~ 20 years which means that early implementation will be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hampaeyan Miandoab M, Ghezavati V, Mohammaditabar D (2020) Developing a simultaneous scheduling of passenger and freight trains for an inter-city railway considering optimization of carbon emissions and waiting times. J Clean Prod 248:119303

    Google Scholar 

  2. Logan KG, Nelson JD, McLellan BC, Hasting A (2020) Electric and hydrogen rail: potential contribution to net zero in the UK. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 87:102523

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo X, Sun W, Yao S, Zheng S (2020) Does high-speed railway reduce air pollution along highways? Evidence from China. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 89:102607

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y, Whalley A (2012) Green infrastructure: the effects of urban rail transit on air quality. Am Econ J Econ Policy 4:58–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo S, Chen L (2019) Can urban rail transit systems alleviate air pollution? Empirical evidence from Beijing. Growth Change 50:130–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IEA (2020) Rail. https://www.iea.org/reports/rail. Accessed 6 Oct 2021

  7. Zamir Khan M, Naheed Khan F (2021) A dynamic analysis of rail travel demand in Pakistan. Case Stud Transp Policy 9:860–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobieralski JB (2021) Energy consumption and emissions dynamics of U.S. domestic intercity air travel. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 99:102993

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mulley C, Hensher DA, Cosgrove D (2017) Is rail cleaner and greener than bus? Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 51:14–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. González-Gil A, Palacin R, Batty P, Powell JP (2014) A systems approach to reduce urban rail energy consumption. Energy Convers Manag 80:509–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin D, Nelson JD, Beecroft M, Cui J (2021) An overview of recent developments in China’s metro systems. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 111:103783

    Google Scholar 

  12. Givoni M, Rietveld P (2007) The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transp Policy 14:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ntlatywa K (2019) Determinants of rail passenger transport usage: a case of Buffalo City Municipality. EIRP Proceedings, vol 14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bubalo T, Rajsman M, Kukec T (2020) Dynamics of passenger demand and transport work in Croatian public road traffic system. Am J Traffic Transp Eng 5:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun Y, Anwar M, Hassan NMS, Spiryagin M, Cole C (2021) A review of hydrogen technologies and engineering solutions for railway vehicle design and operations. Railw Eng Sci 29:212–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spiryagin M, Cole C, Sun YQ, McClanachan M, Spiryagin V, McSweeney T (2014) Design and simulation of rail vehicles. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Cipek M, Pavković D, Kljaić Z, Mlinarić TJ (2019) Assessment of battery-hybrid diesel-electric locomotive fuel savings and emission reduction potentials based on a realistic mountainous rail route. Energy 173:1154–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mandić M, Uglešić I, Milardić V, Filipović-Grčić B (2015) Application of regenerative braking on electrified railway lines in AC traction systems 25 kV, 50 Hz. In: 12th Symposium. HRO CIGRÉ 8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Staffell I, Scamman D, Velazquez Abad A, Balcombe P, Dodds PE, Ekins P, Shah N, Ward KR (2019) The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ Sci 12:463–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones WD (2006) Hydrogen on track. IEEE Spectr 43:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haji Akhoundzadeh M, Panchal S, Samadani E, Raahemifar K, Fowler M, Fraser R (2021) Investigation and simulation of electric train utilizing hydrogen fuel cell and lithium-ion battery. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 46:101234

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruf Y, Zorn T, De Neve PA, Andrae P, Erofeeva S, Garrison F, Schwilling A (2019). Study on the use of fuel cells and hydrogen in the railway environment. https://doi.org/10.2881/495604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marin GD, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2010) Rail transportation by hydrogen vs. electrification—case study for Ontario Canada, I: propulsion and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:6084–6096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marin GD, Naterer GF, Gabriel K (2010) Rail transportation by hydrogen vs. electrification—case study for Ontario, Canada, II: energy supply and distribution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:6097–6107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoffrichter A, Hillmansen S, Roberts C (2016) Conceptual propulsion system design for a hydrogen powered regional train. IET Electr Syst Transp 6:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haseli Y, Naterer GF, Dincer I (2008) Comparative assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation of hydrogen passenger trains. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:1788–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffrichter A, Miller AR, Hillmansen S, Roberts C (2012) Well-to-wheel analysis for electric, diesel and hydrogen traction for railways. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 17:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khodaparastan M, Mohamed AA, Brandauer W (2019) Recuperation of regenerative braking energy in electric rail transit systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20:2831–2847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Janić M (2021) Estimation of direct energy consumption and CO2 emission by high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and hyperloop passenger transport systems. Int J Sustain Transp 15:696–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Givoni M (2006) Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: a review. Transp Rev 26:593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ji H, Yoshitsugu H, Peng J, Quan Y (2012) Economic effect of high-speed rail: empirical analysis of Shinkansen’s impact on industrial location. J Transp Eng 138:1551–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baumeister S, Leung A (2021) The emissions reduction potential of substituting short-haul flights with non-high-speed rail (NHSR): the case of Finland. Case Stud Transp Policy 9:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. DfT (2016) High-speed two: from Crewe to Manchester, the West Midlands to Leeds and beyond. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/897407/high-speed-two-crewe-manchester-west-midlands-leeds-document.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2021

  34. Lalive R, Luechinger S, Schmutzler A (2018) Does expanding regional train service reduce air pollution? J Environ Econ Manage 92:744–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The Wildlife Trusts (2021) High-Speed Rail (HS2). https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/hs2. Accessed 8 Oct 2021

  36. Cornet Y, Dudley G, Banister D (2018) High-Speed Rail: Implications for carbon emissions and biodiversity. Case Stud Transp Policy 6:376–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn G. Logan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Logan, K.G., Hastings, A., Nelson, J.D. (2022). Trains. In: Transportation in a Net Zero World: Transitioning Towards Low Carbon Public Transport. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96674-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96674-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96673-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96674-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics