Abstract
Concepts such as creativity, Computational Thinking (CT), algorithmic thinking, and STEM have become a focus of research and teaching interest in recent years, recognising a priority worldwide by public and educational authorities. Studies show that early exposure to CT and STEM learning encourages students’ interest and educational attainment in various disciplines. Simultaneously, researchers note that there is a belief that pre-service teachers are not yet fully equipped with the knowledge to include CT and coding into the curriculum: the idea that the skills learned in coding activities are helpful in other disciplines. This chapter describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of a semester-scale teaching intervention that involved 23 pre-service teachers who were provided 39 hours to do learning activities using Scratch 3 and MaKey MaKey. The intervention presents positive results concerning computational thinking concepts and coding skills based on a pedagogical practice that encourages active learning and emphasises intrinsic motivation and cognitive outcome. In conclusion, the students enjoyed the activities and, indeed, reported on having achieved a high level of confidence and sense of accomplishment. This study also highlights the importance of including robotics and visual blocks-based programming for pre-service teachers to improve CT knowledge and coding skills.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alkhayat, L., Ernest, J., & LaChenaye, J. (2020). Exploring Kuwaiti preservice early childhood teachers’ beliefs about using web 2.0 technologies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(6), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01036-6
Arduino.cc. (2021). What is Arduino? https://www.arduino.cc/en/guide/introduction
Aydogan, A., & Aydogan, S. K. (2020). The effectiveness of teaching English with Makey Makey in children with Autism spectrum disorder. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 6(16), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.616018
Banaji, S., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2006). Rhetorics of creativity: A review of the literature. Centre for the Study of Children, Youth and Media, Institute of Education, University of London.
Bean, N., Weese, J., Feldhausen, R., & Bell, R. S. (2015). Starting from scratch: Developing a pre-service teacher training program in computational thinking (pp. 1–8). 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344237
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). Cambridge University Press.
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., & Ismail, M. A. B. (2020). The landscape of research on the use of digital game-based learning apps to nurture creativity among young children: A review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100666
Bers, M. U. (2019). Coding as another language: A pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (Eds). (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education – Implications for policy and practice. Publications Office of the European Union.
Caballero-Gonzalez, Y. A., Muñoz-Repiso, A. G. V., & García-Holgado, A. (2019). Learning computational thinking and social skills development in young children through problem solving with educational robotics (pp. 19–23). TEEM’19: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362874
Cabrera, L., Maloney, J. H., & Weintrop, D. (2019). Programs in the palm of your hand: How live programming shapes children’s interactions with physical computing devices (pp. 227–236). IDC ‘19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323138
Castro-Araya, H., Ríos-Cortés, K., & Arguedas-Quesada, C. (2020). Pedagogical support for the educational technology learning program [protea]: A constructivist experience using makey makey and scratch for enrichment purposes in a musical expression course. Revista Educación, 44(2), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i2.39179
Chappell, K., & Craft, A. (2011). Creative learning conversations: Producing living dialogic spaces. Educational Research, 53(3), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.598663
Clarke-Midura, J., Lee, V. R., Shumway, J. F., & Hamilton, M. M. (2019). The building blocks of coding: A comparison of early childhood coding toys. Information and Learning Science, 120(7/8), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0059
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge.
Craft, A. (2010). Creativity and education futures: Learning in a digital age. Trentham Books Ltd..
Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A. (2012). Child-initiated play and professional creativity: Enabling four-year-olds’ possibility thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.11.005
Dagiene, V., Futschek, G., & Stupuriene, G. (2019). Creativity in solving short tasks for learning computational thinking. Constructivist Foundations, 14(3), 382–396. https://constructivist.info/14/3/382
Fessakis, G., Komis, V., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Prantsoudi, S. (2019). Overview of the computer programming learning environments for primary education. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 13(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.3140
Fokides, E., & Papoutsi, A. (2020). Using Makey-Makey for teaching electricity to primary school students. A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1193–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10013-5
García-Valcárcel-Muñoz-Repiso, A., & Caballero-González, Y.-A. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early childhood education. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 27(59), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-06
Gibson, H. (2005). What creativity isn’t: The presumptions of instrumental and individual justifications for creativity in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00288.x
Hooshyar, D., Yousefi, M., Wang, M., & Lim, H. (2018). A data-driven procedural-content-generation approach for educational games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12280
Huang, H. W., Wu, C. W., & Chen, N. S. (2012). The effectiveness of using procedural scaffoldings in a paper-plus-smartphone collaborative learning context. Computers & Education, 59(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.015
Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017). Pre-service kindergarten teachers acceptance of “ScratchJr” as a tool for learning and teaching computational thinking and science education. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), research, practice and collaboration in science education (pp. 21–25). https://www.dropbox.com/s/2p78u1vn6snpr14/ESERA2017_eproceedings_ALL.pdf?dl=0.
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. I. (2021). Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education in Science, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell, K. Appleton, & D. Hanuscin (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824696
Levy, R., & Kucirkova, N. (2017). New technologies in the primary and early years classroom. In J. Moyles, J. Georgeson, & J. Payler (Eds.), Beginning teaching, beginning learning: In early years and primary education. McGraw Hill.
Marín-Marín, J.-A., Costa, R.-S., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., & López-Belmonte, J. (2020). Makey Makey as an interactive robotic tool for high school students’ learning in multicultural contexts. Education in Science, 10(9), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090239
Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., Lahmar, J., & Scott, F. (2018). Play and creativity in young children's use of apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12622
Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2015). Dr. scratch: A web tool to automatically evaluate scratch projects (pp. 132–133). Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818338
Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2017). Towards data-driven learning paths to develop computational thinking with scratch. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2734818
Murcia, K., Campbell, C., & Aranda, G. (2018). Trends in early childhood education practice and professional learning with digital technologies. Pedagogika, 68(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2018.858
Murcia, K., Pepper, C., & Williams, J. (2020). Youth STEM career choices: What’s influencing secondary students’ decision making. Issues in Educational Research, 30(2), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.266265177906130
NAEYC & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media. (2012). Position statement: Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age (Vol. 8) www.naeyc.org/content/technology-and-young-children
Navarrete, C. C. (2013). Creative thinking in digital game design and development: A case study. Computers & Education, 69(2013), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.025
Pan, J., Liu, S., Ma, B., & Qu, Z. (2018). How does proactive personality promote creativity? A multilevel examination of the interplay between formal and informal leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 852–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12221
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Romero, A., & Cruz, S. (2019). Is the use of Makey Makey helpful to teach programming concepts to primary education students? International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 9(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019040105
Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2020). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from a discourse analysis of scientific publications, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3/4), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2020.10037655
Piedade, J., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, J. F. (2020). On teaching programming fundamentals and computational thinking with educational robotics: A didactic experience with pre-service teachers. Education in Science, 10(9), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214
Reisoğlu, İ., & Çebi, A. (2020). How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers & Education, 156(2020), 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103940
Resnick, M. (2017a). Fulfilling Papert’s dream: Computational fluency for all (p. 5). SIGCSE ‘17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3025046
Resnick, M. (2017b). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. MIT Press.
Sáez-López, J. M., Sevillano-García, M. L., & Vazquez-Cano, E. (2019). The effect of programming on primary school students’ mathematical and scientific understanding: Educational use of mBot. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1405–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09648-5
Said-Metwaly, S., Van Noortgate, W., & den, & Kyndt, E. (2017). Methodological issues in measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0014
Samuelsson, I. P., & Carlsson, M. A. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497265
Shih, J. L., Shih, B. J., Shih, C. C., Su, H. Y., & Chuang, C. W. (2010). The influence of collaboration styles to children’s cognitive performance in digital problem-solving game “William adventure”: A comparative case study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.009
Shin, N., Sutherland, L. M., Norris, C. A., & Soloway, E. (2012). Effects of game technology on elementary student learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01197.x
Sisman, B., & Kucuk, S. (2019). An educational robotics course: Examination of educational potentials and pre-service teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5(2), 510–531. https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/505
Stylianidou, F., Glauert, E., Rossis, D., Compton, A., Cremin, T., Craft, A., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2018). Fostering inquiry and creativity in early years STEM education: Policy recommendations from the creative little scientists project. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3875
Torrance, E. P. (1969). Comparative studies of creativity in children. Educational Leadership, 27(2), 146–148. EJ011106. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ011106
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic testing service. Inc. Scholastic Testing Service.
Turan, S., & Aydoğdu, F. (2020). Effect of coding and robotic education on preschool children’s skills of scientific process. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4353–4363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10178-4
van Uum, M. S., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: Scaffolding pupils’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940
Vlasopoulou, M., Kalogiannakis, M., & Sifaki, E. (2021). Investigating teachers’ attitude and behavioral intentions for the impending integration of STEM education in primary schools. In S. Papadakis & M. Kalogiannakis (Eds.), Handbook of research on using education robotics to facilitate student learning (pp. 235–256). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6717-3.ch009
Walsh, C., & Campbell, C. (2018). Introducing coding as a literacy on mobile devices in the early years. In G. Oakley (Ed.), Mobile technologies in children’s language and literacy (pp. 51–66). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-879-620181004
Wang, F., Kinzie, M. B., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0364-6
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the participants of this research and we are especially indebted to the Special Account for Research Funds of the University of Crete, which financially supports our research, KA 10590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S. (2022). Preparing Greek Pre-service Kindergarten Teachers to Promote Creativity: Opportunities Using Scratch and Makey Makey. In: Murcia, K.J., Campbell, C., Joubert, M.M., Wilson, S. (eds) Children’s Creative Inquiry in STEM. Sociocultural Explorations of Science Education, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94724-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94724-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94723-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94724-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)