Skip to main content

Quantifying Quality: Examining Student Satisfaction and Enjoyment of a Middle Eastern Tutorial Centre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Individual and Contextual Factors in the English Language Classroom

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 24))

  • 688 Accesses

Abstract

This piece of exploratory research is an attempt to draw parallels between students who attend Tutorial Centre sessions and their experience in and perceptions of the centre. The research involves quantitative analysis of student feedback based on their perceptions and experiences in the Tutorial Centre as they relate to student learning and development, as well as data collected from the online scheduling database, WCONLINE. Participants were 51 Foundation Programme students from the same course who completed a survey, written in Arabic and English, featuring questions about their experiences of Tutorial Centre sessions and perceptions of how these impacted their learning and level of satisfaction. Analysis of participant responses also indicated whether there was any connection between this information and their number of visits to the Tutorial Centre. Student satisfaction is one key indicator of return visits, and understanding the quality of service from the students’ point of view provides informative and meaningful feedback to guide future improvements. It was found that the rate of satisfaction did not significantly increase for students attending multiple sessions; however, overall results suggest students overwhelmingly find their sessions enjoyable and valuable. Implications of these findings for similar contexts around the world are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alraji, M. N., & Aldhafri, S. S. (2015). Peer tutoring effects on Omani students’ English self-concept. International Education Studies, 8(6), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American River College. (1993). A.R.C. Beacon project: Student catalyst program – Peer assisted learning; first semester summary report. American River College. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED355995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (2001). How’s it going? A practical guide to conferring with student writers. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boquet, E. (2002). Noise from the writing centre. Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carino, P., & Enders, D. (2001). Does frequency of visits to the writing centre increase student satisfaction? A statistical correlation study – Or story. The Writing Centre Journal, 22(1), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2001). Perspectives on the directive/non-directive continuum in the writing centre. The Writing Centre Journal, 22(1), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S. J., Dollard, M. F., & De Jonge, J. (2002). Stress and student job design: Satisfaction, well-being, and performance in university students. International Journal of Stress Management, 9(3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(3), 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriou, M. (2011). An exploratory study of a Middle Eastern writing centre: The perceptions of tutors and tutees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriou, M. (2015). Tutor training. In K. A. Charron (Ed.), Sound instruction: Writing center theory and practice (pp. 1–4). AEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriou, M., & Ramadan, N. (2016). Insights derived from recent training activity: Tutors discuss and reflect on their tutorials. News from the Centers, (Spring), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, S. (2017). Bridging the gap between ideal and reality through peer tutoring. In A. Victor, S. Burns, & W. Rajan (Eds.), Proceedings of Oman 16th international ELT conference: ELT: Ideal vs. reality 2016 conference (pp. 5–13). Sultan Qaboos University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, S. (2019). Academic and personal impact of peer tutoring on the peer tutor. In C. J. Denman & R. Al-Mahrooqi (Eds.), Handbook of research on curriculum reform initiatives in English education (pp. 234–249). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geisler, C. (2004). How ought we to understand the concept of rhetorical agency? Report from the ARS. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 34(3), 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Silva, T. (1993). Tutoring ESL students: Issues and options. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, L., Kryter, K., Prus, J. S., & Fitzgerald, V. (1992). Predicting college student satisfaction, commitment, and attrition from investment model constructs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(16), 1273–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, Y. (2010). Emotions in SLA: New insights from collaborative learning for an EFL classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiden, E. (1994). Repeat attendance at a college tutoring center: The students’ perspectives. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 11(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Addison-Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lape, N. (2012). The worth of the writing centre: Numbers, value, culture and the rhetoric of budget proposals. Praxis: A Writing Centre Journal, 10(1). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/62143/lape_10.1DiversityintheWritingCentre-8.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

  • Loke, A. Y., & Chow, F. L. W. (2007). Learning partnership – The experience of peer tutoring among nursing students: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(2), 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J. C., & Schmidt, H. G. (1994). Effects of staff and student tutors on student achievement. Higher Education, 28(4), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlof, J. (2014). Vygotsky, scaffolding, and the role of theory in writing center work. Writing Center Journal, 34(1), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronesi, L. (2009). Theory in/to practice: Multilingual tutors supporting multilingual peers: A peer-tutor training course in the Arabian Gulf. The Writing Center Journal, 29(2), 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(2), 172–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. M., & Alexander, J. E. (2012). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writerly self-efficacy in writing centers. Journal of writing assessment, 5(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46(2), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thonus, T. (2003). Serving generation 1.5 students in the university writing center. TESOL Journal, 12(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiruchittampalam, S., Ross, A., Whitehouse, E., & Nicholson, T. (2018). Measuring the effectiveness of writing center consultations on L2 writers’ essay writing skills. Language, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3010004

  • Topping, K. T. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, N. (1993). From silence to noise: The writing center as critical exile. The Writing Center Journal, 14(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan McDonald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Data Collection Instrument

Appendix: Data Collection Instrument

The CPS Tutorial Centre (TC) is very interested in your opinions about its services. Please take a few minutes to complete this questionnaire about your experience of the TC this semester (FL 17). Please write a number or tick, as appropriate.

figure a
figure b
figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McDonald, R., Finlay, S. (2022). Quantifying Quality: Examining Student Satisfaction and Enjoyment of a Middle Eastern Tutorial Centre. In: Al-Mahrooqi, R., Denman, C.J. (eds) Individual and Contextual Factors in the English Language Classroom. English Language Education, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91881-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91881-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91880-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91881-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics