Abstract
The growth of a firm depends on its adaptability (Barringer et al., J Business Ventur, 20(5): 663–687, 2005), or, in other words, on the evolution of its business model and its capacity to generate a flow, if not of innovations, then at least of innovative suggestions shared throughout the employee corpus (Foss & Saebi, J Manag, 43: 200–227, 2017). Amongst the factors at the origin of this flux, we should mention, in particular, the entrepreneurs’ regulatory role, and interactions between the head of the firm and employees based on the way in which they steer the company (Redien-Collot & Radu, Handbook of research on strategic management in small and medium enterprises, 2014; Fust et al., Entrepreneur Res J, 8(2): 1–11, 2018). The entrepreneurs’ growing cognitive skills in applying performance monitoring systems are rarely questioned. This study concludes that, for a significant sample of women founders and heads of high-growth firms, there are three steering options generating three types of fairly remarkable swathes of innovative propositions on the part of employees. Two of these steering models present fairly radical socio-cognitive breaks with traditional models. In view of these results, it is impossible to see female leadership as a single (repressed) alternative to masculine models of entrepreneurial success. Women entrepreneurial emancipation has several implications in the understanding of the strategic deployment of their firms. This research explores how the spirit of emancipation drives women’s entrepreneurship, including their strategic choices and the freedom to innovate experienced by their employees.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., & Melin, L. (2010). Business growth – Do practitioners and scholars talk about the same thing? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 312–336.
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562.
Angel, P., Jenkins, A., & Stephens, A. (2018). Understanding entrepreneurial success: A phenomeno-graphic approach. International Small Business Journal, 36(6), 611–636.
Babcock, L., & Laschever, L. (2003). Women don’t ask – Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton UP.
Baron, R. A., Franklin, R. J., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psycho-logical capital. Journal of Management, 42(3), 742–768.
Barringer, B., Foard, J., & Neubaum, D. (2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663–687.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121.
Berger, B. (Ed.). (1993). Esprit d’entreprendre, cultures et sociétés. Maxima.
Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R &D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184.
Bruner, D. (2011). Identifying and comparing characteristics of successful minority and majority businesses. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 3(1), 1–24.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.
Calás, M., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. (2009). Extending the boundaries: Reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. The Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569.
Campbell, A., Shirley, L., & Candy, J. (2004). A longitudinal study of gender-related cognition and behaviour. Developmental Science, 7(1), 1–9.
Cardon, M., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovesk, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.
Cooke, R., & Szumal, J. (1993). Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations: The reliability and validity of organizational culture inventory. Psychological Reports, 72(3), 1299–1339.
Damanpour, F., & Wichnevsky, J. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269–291.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.
Delmar, F. (1997). Measuring growth: Methodological considerations and empirical results. In R. Donckels & A. Miettinen (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and SME research: On its way to the new millennium (pp. 199–216). Ashgate.
Delmar, F. (2006). Measuring growth: Methodological considerations and empirical results. In P. Davidsson, F. Delmar, & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms. E. Elgar.
Denti, L., & Hemlin, S. (2012). Leadership and innovation in organizations: A systematic review of factors that mediate or moderate the relationship. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 37–57.
Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth. In The truth about how women become leaders. Leadership for the common good. Harvard Business School Press.
Ely, R., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493.
Essers, C., & Benschop, Y. (2007). Enterprising identities: Female entrepreneurs of Moroccan and Turkish origin in the Netherlands. Organization Studies, 28(1), 49–69.
Fontana, A., & Musa, S. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovation management and its measurement validation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 2–19.
Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. Journal of Management, 43, 200–227.
Fust, A. P., Jenert, T., & Winkler, C. (2018). Experiential or self-regulated learning: A critical reflection of entrepreneurial learning process. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 8(2), 1–11.
Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95–111.
Gartner, W. B. (2004). Achieving critical mass in entrepreneurship scholarship. In J. A. Katz & D. Sheperd (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 199–216). Elsevier.
Gibb, A. A. (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance: Mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, ritual and confusions. International Small Business Journal, 18, 13–35.
Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V. (1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness as a strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 25–41.
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217–229.
Hjorth, D., & Steyaert, C. (Eds.). (2005). Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship. E. Elgar.
Kesting, P., Ulhøi, J. P., Song, L. J., & Niu, H. (2016). The impact of leadership styles on innovation-a review’. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 22–41.
Kirkwood, J. (2016). How women and men business owners perceive success. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(5), 594–615.
Lau, C.-M., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). Growth intentions of entrepreneurs in a transitional economy: The People’s Republic of China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 5–19.
Le Feuvre, N. (2008). La féminisation des professions masculines: Enjeux sociaux et approches sociologiques. In Y. Guichard-Claudic, D. Kergoat, & A. Vilbroad (Eds.), L’inversion du genre: Quand les métiers masculins se conjuguent au féminin et réciproquement. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
López, O. L., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2015). Management accounting in small and medium-sized enterprises: Current knowledge and avenues for further research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 81–119.
Lubatkin, M., Simsek, Z., & Ling, Y. (2006). Ambidextry and performance in small-to medium sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.
McKelvie, A., Brattström, A., & Wennberg, K. (2017). How young firms achieve growth: Reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities. Small Business Economics, 49(2), 273–293.
McNay, L. (2013). Gender and agency, reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Polity Press.
Monti, D., Ryan, A., Brush, C., & Gannon, A. (2007). Civic capitalism: Entrepreneurs, their ventures and communities. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 353–375.
Moreno, A., & Casillas, J. (2007). High growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: A discriminant analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(1), 69–88.
Moscovici, S. (1984). Psychologie sociale. PUF.
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479–499.
Neergaard, H. (2007). Samplings in entrepreneurial settings. In H. Neergaard & J. Uhloi (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship (pp. 253–278). E. Elgar.
Pedersen, A. R., & Johansen, M. B. (2012). Strategic and everyday innovative narratives: Translating ideas into everyday life in organizations. Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2–18.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Radu, M., & Redien-Collot, R. (2008). The social representation of entrepreneurs in the French press: Desirable and feasible models. International Small Business Journal, 26(3), 259–298.
Redien-Collot, R. (2009). Female entrepreneurs’ authority: Is the creative aspect of authority a masculine fiction in managerial and entrepreneurial paradigms? Journal of Enterprising Culture, 17(4), 419–441.
Redien-Collot, R., & Léger-Jarniou, C. (2018). Retard de la RSE des PME françaises ? La prudence et le discours éthique hybride des dirigeantes de PME de forte croissance. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 17(2), 7–33.
Redien-Collot, R., & Radu, M. (2014). SME’s leaders: Building collective cognition and competences to trigger positive strategic outcomes. In K. Todorov & D. Smallbone (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic management in small and medium enterprises (pp. 143–158). IGI Global.
Rubin, R., Munz, D., & Bommer, W. (2005). Leading from within: The effects of emotional recognition and personality on transformational leadership behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 845–858.
Sappleton, N. (2018). Gender and business performance: The role of entrepreneurial segregation. In S. Y. Yousafzai, A. Fayolle, A. Lindgreen, C. Henry, S. Saeed, & S. Sheikh (Eds.), Women entrepreneurs and the myth of ’underperformance’: A new look at women’s entrepreneurship research. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles. In A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Sequeira, J. M., & Rasheed, A. (2006). Start-up and growth of immigrant small businesses: The impact of social and human capital. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 357–362.
Smith-Hunter, A. E., & Boyd, R. L. (2004). Applying theories of entrepreneurship to a comparative analysis of white and minority business owners. Women in Management Review, 19(1), 18–28.
Soriano, D. R., & Martınez, J. M. (2007). Transmitting the entrepreneurial spirit to the work team in SMEs: The importance of leadership. Management Decision, 45(7), 1102–1122.
Stiegler, B. (1994). La Technique et le Temps: La Faute d’Epiméthée. Galilée.
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 77–94.
Wach, D., Stephan, U., & Gorgievski, M. (2016). More than money: Developing an integrative multi-factorial measure of entrepreneurial success. International Small Business Journal, 34, 1098–1121.
Xie, X., & Lv, J. (2016). Social networks of female tech-entrepreneurs and new venture performance: The moderating effects of entrepreneurial alertness and gender discrimination. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 963–983.
Yang, X., Yi-Hsuan, E., & Chang, A. (2012). Integrating the resource-based view and transaction cost economics in immigrant business performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 753–772.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
1.1 The Methodology of the Women Equity for Growth (WEG) Index
The WEG Index developed the first database with statistics on high-growth SMEs led by women, producing an annual index every year since 2010. The most recent index was presented to the press in December 2016.
Based on the Diane database of 40,000 French companies, the WEG database collects information about all SMEs that have been in existence at least 5 years at the time they are identified and have had an annual turnover of at least 4 million Euros on a continuous basis for each of the 3 preceding years. These companies must of course have had published and registered accounting data for at least 3 years. Out of this first group of companies, branches, cooperatives, semi-public companies, and franchises are then excluded. This leaves a total of 2500 companies that claim to be run by women, which is verified. These 2500 companies are then ranked according to their average results for five performance indicators:
-
Growth in turnover in the last year.
-
Average growth in turnover in the last 3 years.
-
Increase in turnover value in the past year.
-
Profitability in the past year (GOS/turnover).
-
Average growth of GOS over the last 3 years.
The programme has strong institutional support, namely from the General Assembly of the Council of Europe (Resolution 55—March 2011), which encouraged support for the Women Equity initiative through better funding for women-led high-growth companies.
Appendix 2 (Table 2)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Redien-Collot, R. (2022). Growth Loops: From Perceptions of Growth to Motivations for Growth in High-Growth Women-Led Entrepreneurial Firms. In: Faghih, N., Forouharfar, A. (eds) Strategic Entrepreneurship. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86032-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86032-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86031-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86032-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)