Abstract
The maintenance process is crucial in any system that is prone to failure or degradation, particularly in manufacturing operations. In fact, maintenance costs can reach up to 40% of the cost of production in certain industries. In the era of Industry 4.0, maintenance methods can maximize the use of components predicting the remaining useful life. These methods are identified as Predictive Maintenance and include several innovative technologies, such as IoT for deploying sensors that monitor machines and AI that provides the algorithms to interpret the data collected. The information generated from sensor data allows for more accurate predictions using statistical models that are sensitive to the peculiarities of an individual tool set on a particular machine and used by a certain operator. These models, unlike traditional methods based on physical laws, increase in efficiency as the data increases, and therefore are not efficient or usable when a sufficient bank of data is not available. This work proposes a hybrid model that, being based on both classical physics and data-drive models, demonstrates how it is possible to obtain a prediction method that estimates the state of the tool even in the absence of historical data and that increases its accuracy as such data increases. The proposed model is evaluated by using a public experimental milling dataset.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agogino, A., Goebel, K.: Milling Data Set, NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository. BEST lab, UC Berkeley. https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/
Heng, A., Zhang, S., Tan, A.C.C., Mathew, J.: Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 724–739 (2009)
Dos Santos, A.L.B., Duarte, M., Abrao, A.M., Machado, A.: An optimisation procedure to determine the coefficients of the extended Taylor’s equation in machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 39, 17–31 (1999)
Cline, B., Niculescu, R.S., Huffman, D., Deckel, B.: Predictive maintenance applications for machine learning, Orlando, FL, USA. IEEE (2017)
An, D., Kim, N.H., Choi, J.: Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 133, 223–236 (2015)
Johanssona, D., Hägglundb, S., Bushlya, V., Ståhla, J.: Assessment of commonly used tool life models in metal cutting. Procedia Manuf. 11, 602–609 (2017)
Traini, E., Bruno, G., Lombardi, F.: Tool condition monitoring framework for predictive maintenance: a case study on milling process. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2020)
Traini, E., Bruno, G., D’Antonio, G., Lombardi, F.: Machine learning framework for predictive maintenance in milling. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52, 177–182 (2019)
Trojan, F., Marçal, R.F.M.: Proposal of maintenance-types classification to clarify maintenance concepts in production and operations management. J. Bus. Econ. 8, 560–572 (2017)
Sullivan, G.P., Pugh, R., Melendez, A.P., Hunt, W.D.: Operations & maintenance best practices - a guide to achieving operational efficiency (release 3.0). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2010)
Bloch, H.P., Geitner, F.K.: Machinery Failure Analysis and Troubleshooting. Butterworth-Heinemann (2012)
Hale, G.: InTech survey: predictive maintenance top technology challenge in 2007. InTech (2007)
Daily, J., Peterson, J.: Predictive maintenance: how big data analysis can improve maintenance. In: Richter, K., Walther, J. (eds.) Supply Chain Integration Challenges in Commercial Aerospace, pp. 267–278. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46155-7_18
Arruda, J.R.F., Duarte, M.: Updating rotor-bearing finite element models using experimental frequency response functions. AIAA J. (1993)
Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. IJPR 56, 2941–2962 (2018)
Lei, Y.: An improved exponential model for predicting remaining useful life of rolling element bearings. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62, 7762–7773 (2015)
Liang, Z.: A study of tool life sensitivity to cutting speed. In: ASEE PEER (2002)
Liulys, K.: Machine learning application in predictive maintenance. IEEE (2019)
Kan, M.S., Tan, A.C.C., Mathew, J.: A review on prognostic techniques for non-stationary and non-linear rotating systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 62–63, 1–20 (2015)
Mobley, R.K.: An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)
Zhang, Q., Tse, P.W., Wan, X., Xu, G.: Remaining useful life estimation for mechanical systems based on similarity of phase space trajectory. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 2353–2360 (2015)
Rai, R., Sahu, C.K.: Driven by data or derived through physics? A review of hybrid physics guided machine learning techniques with cyber-physical system (CPS) focus. IEEE Access 8, 71050–71073 (2020)
Lei, Y., Lin, J., He, Z., Zuo, J.: A review on empirical mode decomposition in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 35, 108–126 (2013)
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Grant/Award Number: TESUN-83486178370409, finanziamento dipartimenti di eccellenza CAP. 1694 TIT. 232 ART. 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Traini, E., Bruno, G., Lombardi, F. (2021). Design of a Physics-Based and Data-Driven Hybrid Model for Predictive Maintenance. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems. APMS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 634. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85914-5_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85914-5_57
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85913-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85914-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)