Skip to main content

Design of a Physics-Based and Data-Driven Hybrid Model for Predictive Maintenance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems (APMS 2021)

Abstract

The maintenance process is crucial in any system that is prone to failure or degradation, particularly in manufacturing operations. In fact, maintenance costs can reach up to 40% of the cost of production in certain industries. In the era of Industry 4.0, maintenance methods can maximize the use of components predicting the remaining useful life. These methods are identified as Predictive Maintenance and include several innovative technologies, such as IoT for deploying sensors that monitor machines and AI that provides the algorithms to interpret the data collected. The information generated from sensor data allows for more accurate predictions using statistical models that are sensitive to the peculiarities of an individual tool set on a particular machine and used by a certain operator. These models, unlike traditional methods based on physical laws, increase in efficiency as the data increases, and therefore are not efficient or usable when a sufficient bank of data is not available. This work proposes a hybrid model that, being based on both classical physics and data-drive models, demonstrates how it is possible to obtain a prediction method that estimates the state of the tool even in the absence of historical data and that increases its accuracy as such data increases. The proposed model is evaluated by using a public experimental milling dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agogino, A., Goebel, K.: Milling Data Set, NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository. BEST lab, UC Berkeley. https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/

  2. Heng, A., Zhang, S., Tan, A.C.C., Mathew, J.: Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 724–739 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dos Santos, A.L.B., Duarte, M., Abrao, A.M., Machado, A.: An optimisation procedure to determine the coefficients of the extended Taylor’s equation in machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 39, 17–31 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cline, B., Niculescu, R.S., Huffman, D., Deckel, B.: Predictive maintenance applications for machine learning, Orlando, FL, USA. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. An, D., Kim, N.H., Choi, J.: Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 133, 223–236 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johanssona, D., Hägglundb, S., Bushlya, V., Ståhla, J.: Assessment of commonly used tool life models in metal cutting. Procedia Manuf. 11, 602–609 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Traini, E., Bruno, G., Lombardi, F.: Tool condition monitoring framework for predictive maintenance: a case study on milling process. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Traini, E., Bruno, G., D’Antonio, G., Lombardi, F.: Machine learning framework for predictive maintenance in milling. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52, 177–182 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trojan, F., Marçal, R.F.M.: Proposal of maintenance-types classification to clarify maintenance concepts in production and operations management. J. Bus. Econ. 8, 560–572 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sullivan, G.P., Pugh, R., Melendez, A.P., Hunt, W.D.: Operations & maintenance best practices - a guide to achieving operational efficiency (release 3.0). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bloch, H.P., Geitner, F.K.: Machinery Failure Analysis and Troubleshooting. Butterworth-Heinemann (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hale, G.: InTech survey: predictive maintenance top technology challenge in 2007. InTech (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daily, J., Peterson, J.: Predictive maintenance: how big data analysis can improve maintenance. In: Richter, K., Walther, J. (eds.) Supply Chain Integration Challenges in Commercial Aerospace, pp. 267–278. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46155-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Arruda, J.R.F., Duarte, M.: Updating rotor-bearing finite element models using experimental frequency response functions. AIAA J. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L., Li, L.: Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. IJPR 56, 2941–2962 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lei, Y.: An improved exponential model for predicting remaining useful life of rolling element bearings. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62, 7762–7773 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liang, Z.: A study of tool life sensitivity to cutting speed. In: ASEE PEER (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liulys, K.: Machine learning application in predictive maintenance. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kan, M.S., Tan, A.C.C., Mathew, J.: A review on prognostic techniques for non-stationary and non-linear rotating systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 62–63, 1–20 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mobley, R.K.: An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Q., Tse, P.W., Wan, X., Xu, G.: Remaining useful life estimation for mechanical systems based on similarity of phase space trajectory. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 2353–2360 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rai, R., Sahu, C.K.: Driven by data or derived through physics? A review of hybrid physics guided machine learning techniques with cyber-physical system (CPS) focus. IEEE Access 8, 71050–71073 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lei, Y., Lin, J., He, Z., Zuo, J.: A review on empirical mode decomposition in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 35, 108–126 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Grant/Award Number: TESUN-83486178370409, finanziamento dipartimenti di eccellenza CAP. 1694 TIT. 232 ART. 6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Emiliano Traini , Giulia Bruno or Franco Lombardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Traini, E., Bruno, G., Lombardi, F. (2021). Design of a Physics-Based and Data-Driven Hybrid Model for Predictive Maintenance. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems. APMS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 634. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85914-5_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85914-5_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85913-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85914-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics