Skip to main content

Smith and Economic Liberalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought ((PHET))

  • 1142 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the popular idea according to which Smith is the father of economic liberalism. First, this chapter explores the ambiguities of Laissez-faire. Its first occurrence affirms the idea that exporters must act freely to import precious metals, the only strategic commodities lacking in the country. Secondly, it retraces succinctly the history of the word Liberal and of the expression Economic Liberalism. The word liberal refers to the adversaries of the French Restauration (1815–1830) and the Economic Liberalism is a word used by the opponents to the first socialists, after the 1848 Revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 18.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The proceedings of this conference were published by Hiroshi Mizuta and Chuhei Sugiyama (1993).

  2. 2.

    See D. Diatkine (2007) and especially Catherine Audard (2009).

  3. 3.

    See: J. M. Keynes (1926).

  4. 4.

    My translation. “C’est ici que Quesnay s’est rencontré avec le sage M. de Gournay, Intendant du Commerce, son Contemporain, qu’il estima, qu’il aima & sur la personne & sur les disciples duquel il se plaisoit à fonder une partie de l’espoir de sa patrie. M. de Gournay étoit arrivé à ce résultat pratique, par une route différente: personne, disoit-il, ne fait si bien ce qui est utile au commerce que ceux qui le font; il ne faut donc point leur imposer des règlements. Personne n’est si intéressé à savoir si une entreprise de commerce, si un établissement de fabrique, si l’exercice d'une profession lui sera profitable ou non, que celui qui veut le tenter; il ne faut donc ni corporations, ni jurandes, ni privilèges exclusifs”. … “il faut donc affranchir leurs travaux de ces impôts qui en interceptent le succès… Laissez les faire & laissez-les passer”.

  5. 5.

    My translation: “Il faut dire encore que ce prétendu système de M. de Gournay a cela de particulier, que les principes généraux en sont à peu près adoptés par tout le monde; que, de tout temps, le vœu du commerce chez toutes les nations a été renfermé dans ces deux mots: liberté et protection, et surtout liberté. On sait le mot de M. Le Gendre à M. Colbert: “laissez-nous faire””.

  6. 6.

    Mun was a director of the East India Compay (EIC), from 1615 until his death. In the 1620s, the pound sterling was attacked by the foreign-exchange markets, and the price of sterling silver rose. There was debate over why this happened. The newly created EIC, whose trade with India was in deficit as indeed had always been the case of trade between Europe and the Orient, was attacked. Mun defended the Company by demonstrating that the re-export of Asian products to the rest of Europe more than compensated for these deficits. See Lars Magnusson (1994).

  7. 7.

    See F. Hayek (1946).

  8. 8.

    “Qu’est-ce que ce mot libéral/Que des gens d’un certain calibre/Placent toujours tant bien que mal ?/ C’est le diminutif de libre”. Écouchard Lebrun (1729–1807), cited by Littré (18631872).

  9. 9.

    Gide and Rist (1944) suggested that there was during the July Monarchy “…a conjunction of political and economic liberty, and these were melded into the same sect and bore the same name—liberalism. Economic liberty, that of work and transactions, was elevated to the same status as the freedom of conscience or the freedom of the press” (p. 382).

  10. 10.

    Skeat, Etymological Dictionary 1879, 1882; Barnhardt, Dictionary of Etymology 1988.

  11. 11.

    “That system which represents the produce of land as the sole source of the revenue and wealth of every country has, so far as I know, never been adopted by any nation, and it at present exists only in the speculations of a few men of great learning and ingenuity in France. It would not, surely, be worth while to examine at great length the errors of a system which never has done, and probably never will do any harm in any part of the world” (WON, 663).

References

  • Albon, Comte d’. (1775). Eloge historique de François Quesnay. de Knapen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audard, C. (2009). Qu’est-ce que le libéralisme? Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat, F. (1849). Protectionnisme et communisme. Paris, Guillaumin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biziou M. (2003). Adam Smith et l’origine du libéralisme. P.U.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diatkine, D. (2007). Le suffrage et le marché: la critique par Smith du système mercantile est-elle libérale ? Cahiers d’Economie Politique (52).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gide, C., & Rist, C. (1944). Histoire des doctrines économiques, depuis les Physiocrates jusqu’à nos jours. Larose et Tenin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, K. (1981). The science of a lagislator. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1946). Individualism: True and false. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1926). The End of Laissez-Faire. Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavisse, E. (Ed.). (1921). Histoire de la France contemporaine. Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littré. (1863–1872). Dictionnaire de la langue française. Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L. (1994). The shaping of an economic language. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G., & Samuels, W. J. (2005). Freeing Smith from the “free market”: On the misperception of Adam Smith on the economic role of government. History of Political Economy, 37(2), 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirabeau. (1763). Philosophie rurale, ou Economie Générale et politique de l’agriculture. Amsterdam, Libraires associés.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta, H., & Sugiyama, C. (1993). Adam Smith. London, Mac Millan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mun, T. (1664–1895). England’s treasure by foreign trade or the Balance of foreign trade is the rule of our treasure. https://en.wikisource.org

  • Pack, S. (1991). Adam smith's critique of the free market economy. Billing & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack, S. (2005). Freeing Smith from the “free market”: On the misperception of Adam Smith on the economic role of government. History of Political Economy, 37(2), 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. (2006). An Austrian perspective on the history of economic thought (Vol. 1). Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgot, . (1970). Ecrits Economiques. Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1928). Adam Smith and laissez faire. In John Maurice Clark et al., Adam Smith 1776–1926. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, D. (1978). Adam Smith’s politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diatkine, D. (2021). Smith and Economic Liberalism. In: Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations. Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81600-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81600-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81599-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81600-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics