Skip to main content

Freedom, Rationality, and Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Conceptual Foundation of Morality

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 145))

  • 171 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I refute skepticism about freedom of the will. I explain how the rationalist moral theory developed earlier in this book gives meaning to the idea of freedom in a deterministic world, by explicating it in terms of rationality. My analysis also sheds light on the notions of responsibility and punishment, which are an essential part of any normative theory of conduct. The conclusions of this chapter are that freedom is compatible with determinism, and that freedom, morality, and rationality are interdependent. A (perfectly) rational agent is also a moral and a free agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle, 1963. Categories and De Interpretatione. Trans. John L. Ackrill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, 2004. Nicomachean Ethics. Ed. and Trans. Roger Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Mark. 1990. Fatalism Revisited. Metaphilosophy 21 (3): 270–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobzien, Suzanne. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Anthony. 1962. A Clockwork Orange. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. Joseph. 2010. Incompatibilism and Fatalism: Reply to Loss. Analysis 70 (1): 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald. 1963. Actions, Reasons and Causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, Rene. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes vol. I. Trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., & Murdoch, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Double, Richard. 1991. The Non-Reality of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, L. Waddell. 2000. Free Will: A Philosophical Study. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. Martin, and Mark Ravizza, eds. 1993. Perspectives on Moral Responsibility. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1982. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. In Gary Watson, ed. Free Will, 81–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, Carl. 1990. On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1978. In A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Lawrence Amherst Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Robert. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Incompatibilism. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, ed. Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne, and Dean W. Zimmerman, 285–302. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Ed. and Trans. Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, J. Tim. 2011. Free Will: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, Alfred. 1995. Autonomous Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Motivation and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Millgram, Elijah. 1995. Was Hume a Humean? Hume Studies 21 (1): 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. George. 1947. Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, George. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York, NY: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, Thomas. 2004. Free Will: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas. 2010. Free Will: An Extensive Bibliography. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roojen, Van, and Mark. 2010. Moral Rationalism and Rational Amoralism. Ethics 120: 495–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaun, Nichols. 2002. How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral? The Monist 85 (2): 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilansky, Saul. 2000. Free Will and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, Benedict. 1994. Ethics. In A Spinoza Reader, ed. Edwin Curley, 85–265. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, F. Peter. 2008. Freedom and Resentment. In his Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, 1–28. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Galen. 2002. The Bounds of Freedom. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Robert Kane, 441–460. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Richard. 1962. Fatalism. The Philosophical Review 71 (1): 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Free Will Remains a Mystery. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed. Robert Kane, 158–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vihvelin, Kadri. 2008. Compatibilism, Incompatibilism, and Impossibilism. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, ed. Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne, and Dean W. Zimmerman, 303–318. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Gary. 1982. Free Agency. In his Free Will, 96–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Two Faces of Responsibility. Philosophical Topics 24: 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yehezkel, Gal. 2016. The Rejection of Fatalism about the Past. Organon F 23 (4): 525–538.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yehezkel, G. (2022). Freedom, Rationality, and Responsibility. In: The Conceptual Foundation of Morality. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80583-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics