Skip to main content

Agent-Based Simulation of the Classroom Environment to Gauge the Effect of Inattentive or Disruptive Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12677))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The classroom environment is a major contributor to the learning process in schools. Young students are affected by different details in their academic progress, be it their own characteristics, their teacher’s or their peers’. The combination of these factors is known to have an impact on the attainment of young students. However, what is less known are ways to accurately measure the impact of the individual variables. Moreover, in education, predicting an end-result is not enough, but understanding the process is vital. Thus, in this paper, we simulate the interactions between these factors to offer education stakeholders – administrators and teachers, in a first instance – the possibility of understanding how their activities and the way they manage the classroom can impact on students’ academic achievement and result in different learning outcomes. The simulation is based on data from Performance Indicator in Primary Schools (PIPS) monitoring system, of 65,385 records that include 3,315 classes from 2,040 schools, with an average of 26 students per class collected in 2007. The results might serve teachers in solving issues that occur in classrooms and improve their strategies based on the predicted outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    RR344_-_Performance_Indicators_in_Primary_Schools.pdf (publishing.service.gov.uk).

  2. 2.

    Please note however that PIPS data is only available for Start Math and End Math, thus only the start and end of the simulation process.

References

  1. Agnihotri, L., et al.: Mining login data for actionable student insight. In: Proceedings 8th International Conference Educational Data Mining, pp. 472–475 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blank, C., Shavit, Y.: The association between student reports of classmates’ disruptive behavior and student achievement. AERA Open 2(3),(2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416653921

  3. Bourne, P.A.: A token economy: an approach used for behavior modifications among disruptive primary school children. MOJ Public Heal. 7(3) (2018). https://doi.org/10.15406/mojph.2018.07.00212

  4. Cardoso, A.P., et al.: Personal and pedagogical interaction factors as determinants of academic achievement. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 29, 1596–1605 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb, J.A.: Relationship of discrete classroom behaviors to fourth-grade academic achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 63(1), 74–80 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finn, J.D., et al.: Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31(2), 386–408 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Department for Education: Class Size and education in England evidence report. Research Report DFE-RR169, pp. 34–35 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Department for Education and Skills: Mathematical activities for the Foundation Stage Early years (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esturgó-Deu, M.E., Sala-Roca, J.: Disruptive behaviour of students in primary education and emotional intelligence. Teach. Teach. Educ. 26(4), 830–837 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Finn, J.D., Pannozzo, G.M., Voelkl, K.E.: Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elem. Sch. J. 95(5), 421–434 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1086/461853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitz-Gibbon, C.T.: Official indicator systems in the UK: examinations and inspections. Int. J. Educ. Res. 25(3), 239–247 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haroun, R., O’Hanlon, C.: Teachers’ perceptions of discipline problems in a jordanian secondary school. Pastor. Care Educ. 15(2), 29–36 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0122.00053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Houghton, S., et al.: Classroom behaviour problems which secondary school teachers say they find most troublesome. Br. Educ. Res. J. 14(3), 297–312 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192880140306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ingram, F.J., Brooks, R.J.: Simulating classroom lessons: an agent-based attempt. In: Proceedings Operational Research Society Simulation Work SW 2018, pp. 230–240 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koneya, M.: Location and interaction in row-and-column seating arrangements. Environ. Behav. 8(2), 265–281 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koster, A., Koch, F., Assumpção, N., Primo, T.: The role of agent-based simulation in education. In: Koch, F., Koster, A., Primo, T., Guttmann, C. (eds.) CARE/SOCIALEDU -2016. CCIS, vol. 677, pp. 156–167. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52039-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Long, R.: The School Day and Year (England). House Commons Library, Vol. 07148 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Macal, C., North, M.: Introductory tutorial: agent-based modeling and simulation, pp. 6–20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Macal, C.M., North, M.J.: Agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 86–98 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2009.5429318

  21. Masad, D., Kazil, J.: Mesa: an agent-based modeling framework. In: Proceedings 14th Python Science Conference, pp. 51–58, April 2015. https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-7b98e3ed-009

  22. Mauricio, S., et al.: Analysing differential school effectiveness through multilevel and agent-based modelling Multilevel Modelling and School Effectiveness Research. 17, 1–13 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Merrell, C., et al.: A longitudinal study of the association between inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity and children’s academic attainment at age 11. Learn. Individ. Differ. 53, 156–161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Merrell, C., Tymms, P.B.: Inattention, hyperactivity and impulsiveness: their impact on academic achievement and progress. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 71(1), 43–56 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Müller, C.M., et al.: Peer influence on disruptive classroom behavior depends on teachers’ instructional practice. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 56, 99–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paul, R., et al.: Using agent-based modelling for EER experimental design: preliminary validation based on student cheating behaviours. In: Canadian Engineering Education Association, pp. 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ponticorvo, M., et al.: An agent-based modelling approach to build up educational digital games for kindergarten and primary schools. Expert Syst. 34(4), 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shin, H., Ryan, A.M.: Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: teacher emotional support matters. Dev. Psychol. 53(1), 114–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, D.P., et al.: Who goes where? The importance of peer groups on attainment and the student use of the lecture theatre teaching space. FEBS Open Bio 8(9), 1368–1378 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stephenson, J., et al.: Behaviours of concern to teachers in the early years of school. Int. J. Disabil. Dev. Educ. 47(3), 225–235 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/713671118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Swing, S.R., Peterson, P.L.: The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. Am. Educ. Res. J. 19(2), 259–274 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomasevic, N., et al.: An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction. Comput. Educ. 143, 103676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tymms, P.: Baseline Assessment and Monitoring in Primary Schools (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tymms, P., Albone, S.: Performance indicators in primary schools. In: School Improvement through Performance Feedback, pp. 191–218 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tymms, P., Brown, C.: Modelling educational systems: an interactive approach to integrating theory and policy

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tymms, P., Coe, R.: Celebration of the success of distributed research with schools: the CEM centre. Durham. Br. Educ. Res. J. 29(5), 639–667 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. World Heal. Organ. 55(1993), 135–139 (1993). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khulood Alharbi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alharbi, K., Cristea, A.I., Shi, L., Tymms, P., Brown, C. (2021). Agent-Based Simulation of the Classroom Environment to Gauge the Effect of Inattentive or Disruptive Students. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80420-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80421-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics