Abstract
Many of our activities involve joint action. Here we explore a possible consequence of joint action: Completing a task may improve one’s ability to learn a novel task from a partner. In the Joint condition of three experiments, participants and experimenters jointly used a wire to cut candles for five minutes. In the control condition, the participants used the wire to cut the candles alone. After cutting, the experimenter demonstrated a novel, complex movement that was imitated by the participant. Compared to the control condition, participants in the Joint condition imitated the experimenter more accurately, at a shorter lag, and reproduced the sequence more accurately without the experimenter’s involvement. In experiments using electroencephalography, we used mu-desynchronization to track changes in the action mirror neuron system produced by candle-cutting. Although we did not confirm all predictions of a mirror neuron account, the results were generally consistent with our hypothesis that joint action enhances subsequent social learning by changing a mirror mechanism. In addition, the Joint participants reported greater closeness to the experimenter. We end the chapter by briefly exploring the consequences of joint modification of the mirror neuron system for social relations, teaching, and rehabilitation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Full results are available from glenberg@asu.edu. Unless otherwise noted, described effects are significant at p < 0.05.
References
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 247–286.
Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22, 1138–1144.
Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1996). Love and expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45–58.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.
Aron, A., & Fraley, B. (1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17, 140–160.
Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). Oxford University Press.
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., & Lewandowski, G. (2002). Shared participation in self-expanding activities: Positive effects on experienced martial quality. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction; understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 177–194). Cambridge University Press.
Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284.
Bohn, M., Kordt, C., Braun, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2020). Learning novel skills from iconic gestures: A developmental and evolutionary perspective. Psychological Science, 31, 873–880.
Buxbaum, L. J., Giovannetti, T., & Libon, D. (2000). The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: Evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition, 44, 166–191.
Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology, 17, 1527–1531.
Chaminade, T., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). An fMRI study of imitation: Action representation and body schema. Neuropsychologia, 43, 115–127.
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S. P., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998). Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 1117–1123.
Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014). Mirror neurons: From origin to function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 177–192.
Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48, 905–922.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402.
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608–2611.
Fox, N. A., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Yoo, K. H., Bowman, L. C., Cannon, E. N., Vanderwert, R. E., Ferrari, P. F., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Assessing human mirror activity with EEG mu rhythm: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 291–313.
Franceschini, M., Agosti, M., Cantagallo, A., Sale, P., Mancuso, M., & Buccino, G. (2010). Mirror neurons: Action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46, 517–523.
Gallese, V. (2005). Being like me: Self-other identity, mirror neurons, and empathy. Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animalsIn S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 101–118). MIT Press.
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–403.
Herman, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.
Higuchi, S., Holle, H., Roberts, N., Eickhoff, S. B., & Vogt, S. (2012). Imitation and observational learning of hand actions: Prefrontal involvement and connectivity. NeuroImage, 59, 1668–1683.
Lewandowski, G. W., & Aron, A. P. (2004). Distinguishing arousal from novelty and challenge in initial romantic attraction between strangers. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 361–372.
Mashek, D. J., Aron, A., & Boncimino, M. (2003). Confusions of self with close others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 382–392.
Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A. D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., & Fried, I. (2010). Single-neuron response in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology, 20, 750–756.
Pesquita, A., Whitwell, R. L., & Enns, J. T. (2018). Predictive joint-action model: A hierarchical predictive approach to human cooperation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1751–1769.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190.
Ping, R. M., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2014). Understanding gesture: Is the listener’s motor system involved? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 195–204.
Rekers, Y., Haun, D., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Children, but not chimpanzees, prefer to collaborate. Current Biology, 21, 1756–1758.
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: A basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 757–765.
Soliman, T. M., Ferguson, R., Dexheimer, M. S., & Glenberg, A. M. (2015). Consequences of joint action: Entanglement with your partner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 873–888.
Stefan, K., Classen, J., Celnik, P., & Cohen, L. G. (2008). Concurrent action observation modulates practice-induced motor memory formation. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 730–738.
Tarr, B., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. (2016). Silent disco: Dancing in synchrony leads to elevated pain thresholds and social closeness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 343–349.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
Tunçgenç, B., & Cohen, E. (2016). Movement synchrony forges social bonds across group divides. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 782.
Uddin, L. Q., Iacoboni, M., Lange, C., & Keenan, J. P. (2007). The self and social cognition: The role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 153–157.
Umiltà, M. A., Escola, L., Intskirveli, I., Grammont, F., Rochat, M., Caruana, F., et al. (2008). When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 2209–2213.
Vacharkulksemsuk, T., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 399–402.
Vul, E., Harris, C., & Winkielman, & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274–290.
Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self–other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93–106.
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.
Acknowledgement
Tamer Soliman was supported by an ASU Dissertation Fellowship, A.K. Munion was partially supported by a grant from the ASU Barrett Honors College, and Arthur Glenberg was partially supported by National Science Foundation Awards 1,020,367367 and 1,324,807807. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. We thank Annette Marino who developed much of the programming needed for the EEG experiments and assisted in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soliman, T., Munion, A.K., Goodwin, B., Gelbart, B., Blais, C., Glenberg, A.M. (2021). Joint Action Enhances Subsequent Social Learning by Strengthening a Mirror Mechanism. In: Robinson, M.D., Thomas, L.E. (eds) Handbook of Embodied Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78470-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78471-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)