Abstract
In this chapter, I will elaborate some reflections on Valsiner’s concept of bounded indeterminacy because I consider it to one of the main concepts that reveal the genetic-cultural heritage, as well as the significance of Valsiner’s work to the contemporary cultural psychology. The concept of bounded indeterminacy clearly dispels Jaan Valsiner’s semiotic-cultural psychology from the dichotomy of a self-sufficient self, on the one hand, and from a sovereign environment external to the self, on the other hand. Equally, the concept marks Valsiner’s psychology as one that denies linear causality, offering as a counterpoint a path that points to the human life’s bidirectional personal-cultural relationship, which anchors itself in its own human meaning-making. One of Valsiner’s perspective resonances is to give semiotic-cultural psychology the possibility to establish an integrative dialogue with the notion of tradition, in the hermeneutic sense of Hans-Georg Gadamer, as a part of the process of formation and transformation of the symbolic field of action that is culture (Boesch, 1991).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
According to Valsiner, this notion is closer to the notion of probabilistic epigenesis, from Gottlieb, 1976, 1992)(cf. Valsiner, 1997, p.323).
- 2.
Valsiner takes this notion of canalization from Waddington’s biology (cf. Valsiner, 1997, p. 164).
- 3.
According to Valsiner himself, this dynamicity and temporary, contextual character of the notion of bounded indeterminacy is borrowed from the field theory of Kurt Lewin (Valsiner, 1986/1997, p. 183).
- 4.
The term “tradition” is mentioned 53 times in the work (Valsiner, 2013). However, we believe that these two moments are the most significant for the dialogue we intend to establish here between the notion of bounded indeterminacy and the one of tradition.
References
Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and culture psychology. Springer-Verlag.
Grodin, J. (2002). Gadamer’s basic understanding of understanding. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 1–12). Cambridge University Press.
Harrist, S., & Richardson, F. C. (2011). Levinas and hermeneutics on ethics and the other. Theory & Psychology, 22(3), 342–358.
Hermans, H. J. M. (1991). The person as co-investigator in self-research: Valuation theory. European Journal of Personality, 5, 217–234.
Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Opposites in dialogical self: Constructs as characters. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 9, 1–26.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Bonarius, H. (1991a). The person as co-investigator in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 5, 199–216.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Bonarius, H. (1991b). Static laws in a dynamic psychology? European Journal of Personality, 5, 245–247.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1995). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. Academic Press.
Simão, L. M. (2005). Bildung, culture and self: A possible dialogue with Gadamer, Boesch and Valsiner? Theory & Psychology, 15, 549–574.
Simão, L. M. (2015). The temporality of tradition: Some horizons for the semiotic-cultural constructivism in psychology. In L. M. Simão, D. S. Guimarães, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Temporality: Culture in the flow of human experience (pp. 483–503). Information Age Publishing.
Simão, L. M. (2016). Ernst E. Boesch’s ontologic predication in focus. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 568–585.
Valsiner, J. (1987).Culture and the development of children’s action. Wiley. (second edition 1997).
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action. Wiley.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2013). An invitation to cultural psychology. SAGE.
Valsiner, J. (2014). CVittae.
Warnke, G. (2012).Solidarity and tradition in Gadamer’s hermeneutics. History and Theory, Theme Issue, 51, 6–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simão, L.M. (2021). The Bounded Indeterminacy of Tradition. In: Wagoner, B., Christensen, B.A., Demuth, C. (eds) Culture as Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77892-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77892-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77891-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77892-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)