Skip to main content

The Bounded Indeterminacy of Tradition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Culture as Process

Abstract

In this chapter, I will elaborate some reflections on Valsiner’s concept of bounded indeterminacy because I consider it to one of the main concepts that reveal the genetic-cultural heritage, as well as the significance of Valsiner’s work to the contemporary cultural psychology. The concept of bounded indeterminacy clearly dispels Jaan Valsiner’s semiotic-cultural psychology from the dichotomy of a self-sufficient self, on the one hand, and from a sovereign environment external to the self, on the other hand. Equally, the concept marks Valsiner’s psychology as one that denies linear causality, offering as a counterpoint a path that points to the human life’s bidirectional personal-cultural relationship, which anchors itself in its own human meaning-making. One of Valsiner’s perspective resonances is to give semiotic-cultural psychology the possibility to establish an integrative dialogue with the notion of tradition, in the hermeneutic sense of Hans-Georg Gadamer, as a part of the process of formation and transformation of the symbolic field of action that is culture (Boesch, 1991).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Valsiner, this notion is closer to the notion of probabilistic epigenesis, from Gottlieb, 1976, 1992)(cf. Valsiner, 1997, p.323).

  2. 2.

    Valsiner takes this notion of canalization from Waddington’s biology (cf. Valsiner, 1997, p. 164).

  3. 3.

    According to Valsiner himself, this dynamicity and temporary, contextual character of the notion of bounded indeterminacy is borrowed from the field theory of Kurt Lewin (Valsiner, 1986/1997, p. 183).

  4. 4.

    The term “tradition” is mentioned 53 times in the work (Valsiner, 2013). However, we believe that these two moments are the most significant for the dialogue we intend to establish here between the notion of bounded indeterminacy and the one of tradition.

References

  • Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and culture psychology. Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grodin, J. (2002). Gadamer’s basic understanding of understanding. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 1–12). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrist, S., & Richardson, F. C. (2011). Levinas and hermeneutics on ethics and the other. Theory & Psychology, 22(3), 342–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (1991). The person as co-investigator in self-research: Valuation theory. European Journal of Personality, 5, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Opposites in dialogical self: Constructs as characters. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 9, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Bonarius, H. (1991a). The person as co-investigator in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 5, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Bonarius, H. (1991b). Static laws in a dynamic psychology? European Journal of Personality, 5, 245–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1995). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simão, L. M. (2005). Bildung, culture and self: A possible dialogue with Gadamer, Boesch and Valsiner? Theory & Psychology, 15, 549–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simão, L. M. (2015). The temporality of tradition: Some horizons for the semiotic-cultural constructivism in psychology. In L. M. Simão, D. S. Guimarães, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Temporality: Culture in the flow of human experience (pp. 483–503). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simão, L. M. (2016). Ernst E. Boesch’s ontologic predication in focus. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 568–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1987).Culture and the development of children’s action. Wiley. (second edition 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2013). An invitation to cultural psychology. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). CVittae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnke, G. (2012).Solidarity and tradition in Gadamer’s hermeneutics. History and Theory, Theme Issue, 51, 6–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lívia Mathias Simão .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Simão, L.M. (2021). The Bounded Indeterminacy of Tradition. In: Wagoner, B., Christensen, B.A., Demuth, C. (eds) Culture as Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77892-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics