Abstract
Rural dermatology faces many challenges across the United States and internationally that require an increased focus on health services research. The focus of this research should be in several areas that promise the potential for improving rural healthcare. First, among the vast number of dermatologic conditions, rural dermatologic problems are significantly different than those seen in urban populations and require special efforts to educate rural providers and the development of cost-effective treatments for rural citizens. Secondly, despite great efforts to provide dermatological care to an ever-growing number of underserved rural patients, a workforce shortage of rural dermatologists and other dermatology health care providers complicates efforts to find truly effective solutions. It is critical to study the implementation of rural physician programs that incentivize the relocation of existing dermatologists and increase the number of residency positions focused on training rural physicians. Rural manpower issues are even more acute in international rural areas. Finally, the use of teledermatology has allowed for the expansion of dermatological services to rural areas utilizing urban dermatology manpower. Whether “live action” or “store-and-forward” methods, patients can be managed by dermatologists with greater ease, time and cost savings related to patient travel, and decreased wait-times for clinic appointments. Teledermatology has also led to the implementation of educational and training programs for primary care providers, such as Project ECHO, to provide basic dermatology care allowing patients to avoid commuting to distant, urban centers. Further research is required to understand barriers to the provision of rural dermatology services and develop effective solutions to right-size the rural workforce, expand rural teledermatology, and provide the dermatologic care rural citizens deserve.
Living in a rural setting exposes you to so many marvelous things – the natural world and the particular texture of small-town life and the exhilarating experience of open space.
—Susan Orlean
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, et al. The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:1527–34.
Lim HW, Collins SAB, Resneck JS, Bolognia JL, Hodge JA, Rohrer TA, Van Beek MJ, Margolis DJ, Sober AJ, Weinstock MA, Nerenz DR, Begolka WS, Moyano JV. The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(5):958–972 E2.
Naafs B. The skin. In: Parry E, Godfrey R, Mabey D, Hill G, editors. Principles of medicine in Africa. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 1264–301.
Wootton CI, Bell S, Philavanh A, et al. Assessing skin disease and associated health-related quality of life in a rural Lao community. BMC Dermatol. 2018;18:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-0079-8.
Cloete D. Dermatology nursing in a rural area – the Overberg experience. In: CME : Your SA Journal of CPD, vol. 31. 7th ed. Western Cape, South Africa: South African Medical Association NPC; 2013. p. 254–8.
Naafs B, Matemera BO, Mudarikwa L, Noto S. Position paper to Ministry of Health; 1986. Harare, Zimbabwe.
Burgiss SG, Julius CE, Watson HW, Haynes BK, Buonocore E, Smith GT. Telemedicine for dermatology care in rural patients. Telemed J. 1997;3(3):227–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.227.
Bram H, Frauendorfer M, Spencer S, Hartos J. Does the prevalence of skin cancer differ by metropolitan status for males and females in the United States?. 2017, December 14. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://preventive-medicine.imedpub.com/does-the-prevalence-of-skin-cancer-differ-by-metropolitan-status-for-males-and-females-in-the-united-states.php?aid=21301
Slesinger DP. Health status and needs of migrant farm workers in the United States: a literature review. J Rural Health. 1992;8(3):227–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.1992.tb00356.x.
Vaidya T, Zubritsky L, Alikhan A, Housholder A. Socioeconomic and geographic barriers to dermatology care in urban and rural US populations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(2):406–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.050.
Feng H, Berk-Krauss J, Feng PW, Stein JA. Comparison of dermatologist density between urban and rural counties in the United States. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(11):1265–71.
Uhlenhake E, Brodell R, Mostow E. The dermatology work force: a focus on urban versus rural wait times. J Am Acad Dermat. 2009;61(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.09.008.
Naafs B, Padovese V. Rural dermatology in the tropics. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27(3):252–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2008.10.005.
Roosta N, Black DS, Rea TH. A comparison of stigma among patients with leprosy in rural Tanzania and urban United States: a role for public health in dermatology. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(4):432–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05226.x.
Murgia V, Bilcha KD, Shibeshi D. Community dermatology in Debre Markos: an attempt to define children’s dermatological needs in a rural area of Ethiopia. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(6):666–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04284.x.
Lewis H, Becevic M, Myers D, Helming D, Mutrux R, Fleming DA, Edison KE. Dermatology ECHO – an innovative solution to address limited access to dermatology expertise. Rural Remote Health. 2018;18:4415. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH4415.
Norton SA, Burdick AE, Phillips CM, Berman B. Teledermatology and underserved populations. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(2):197–200. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1997.03890380069010.
McFarland LV, Raugi GJ, Taylor LL, Reiber GE. Implementation of an education and skills programme in a teledermatology project for rural veterans. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;18(2):66–71. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2011.110518.
Morenz AM, Wescott S, Mostaghimi A, Sequist TD, Tobey M. Evaluation of barriers to telehealth programs and dermatological care for American Indian Individuals in Rural Communities. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(8):899–905. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0872.
Basarab T, Munn SE, Jones RR. Diagnostic accuracy and appropriateness of general practitioner referrals to a dermatology out-patient clinic. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135(1):70–3.
Resneck J, Kimball AB. The dermatology workforce shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(1):50–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.07.001.
Salsberg E, Rockey PH, Rivers KL, Brotherton SE, Jackson GR. US residency training before and after the 1997 balanced budget act. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1174–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1174.
Yoo JY, Rigel DS. Trends in dermatology: geographic density of US dermatologists. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:779.
Phillips R, Doodoo M, Pettersen S, et al. Specialty and geographic distribution of the physician workforce: what influences medical student & resident choices? http://www.graham-center.org/dam/rgc/documents/publications-reports/monographs-books/Specialty-geography-compressed.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2020.
Resneck JS, Kostecki J. An analysis of dermatologist migration patterns after residency training. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(9):1065–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2011.228.
Zurfley F, Mostow EN. Association between the use of a physician extender and dermatology appointment wait times in Ohio. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(12):1323–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3394.
Jalian HR, Avram MM. Mid-level practitioners in dermatology: a need for further study and oversight. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(11):1149–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1922.
Lowell B, Froelich C, Federman D, Kirsner R. Dermatology in primary care: prevalence and patient disposition. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:250–5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.114598.
Ramsay DL, Fox AB. The ability of primary care physicians to recognize the common dermatoses. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117(10):620–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1981.01650100022020.
Federman DG, Concato J, Kirsner RS. Comparison of dermatologic diagnoses by primary care practitioners and dermatologists. A review of the literature. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(2):170–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.8.2.170. PMID: 10101989.
Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, Kurdyak P, Sockalingam S. MHPE the impact of project ECHO on participant and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1439–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001328.
Marrast LM, Zallman L, Woolhandler S, Bor DH, McCormick D. Minority physicians’ role in the care of underserved patients: diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):289–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12756.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, J.E., Thomley, M.E., Sharma, M., Nahar, V.K. (2021). Worldwide Rural Dermatology Health Services Research. In: Brodell, R.T., Byrd, A.C., Firkins Smith, C., Nahar, V.K. (eds) Dermatology in Rural Settings. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75984-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75984-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75983-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75984-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)