Skip to main content

SLOType: Empowering Users’ Autonomous Learning Within a Hybrid Methodology for Formal Type Design Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication II

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to assess the effects of employing an agile pedagogical methodology can have on the creative and educational processes of typeface design. The time available for students in public higher education institutions to learn is increasingly scarce due to all the academic solicitations and current courses’ structure. It is especially challenging to apply their recently acquired knowledge into practice. We have developed the SLOType workshop methodology supported by Gerrit Noordzij’s “The Stroke” theory to be used in a learning environment. And a companion digital online application to support the activities by providing increasingly complex type design prompts synchronized with the theoretical approach. This methodology aims to kickstart the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, practical skills and, at the same time, to promote autonomous learning by challenging the students by gamifying the user experience. The preliminary analysis of three editions of an experimental study of the workshop in two different master courses in public higher education institutions with 127 participants seems to indicate that practice helps to promote creativity; the SLOType methodology and digital application have a slightly positive effect on the visual quality and originality of results generated, and the tool seems to trigger the necessary curiosity and drive users to further research type design history and references. The workshop method has been adapted to an online mode during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has also promoted the use of tools and the definition of features that have improved and will improve future editions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It’s important to note that participants in the HEI context are informed that the workshop will not be used for grading purposes.

  2. 2.

    In the last editions of the workshop, this included the install and testing of the necessary mobile apps and uploading actions to the online whiteboard.

  3. 3.

    This common “glyph slot” space in the page will later be used to transpose/explain the Glyphs or Fontlab software Em Square glyph design space.

  4. 4.

    Due to the rough and rigid nature of the balsa nib tool, we are not able to explore the expansion from Noordzij’s theory.

  5. 5.

    In the last editions, we have used the print screens and the whiteboard export functionality. Although we haven’t found the need for it, it is also possible to export and download the original images uploaded by the participants.

References

  1. Levine F, Macom S (2013) Sign painters. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gray N (1986) A history of lettering: creative experiment and letter identity. Phaidon

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flor M (2018) Os Segredos de Ouro do Lettering: design de letreiros, do esboço à arte final. Gustavo Gili, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  4. Genovese A (2011) Manual de filete porteño. 2nd edn. Grupo Ediciones Porteñas, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton E (2014) The golden thread: a history of writing. Catapult

    Google Scholar 

  6. Omagari T (2019) Arcade game typography: the art of pixel type. Thames & Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawson A (2002) Anatomy of a typeface. New Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drucker J (2004) What is a letter. In: Heller S (ed) The education of a typographer. Allworth Communications, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng K (2006) Designing type. Yale University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lupton E (2010) Thinking with type. Princeton Architectural Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Earls D (2002) Designing typefaces. Rotovision, Mies

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amado P (2014) Participação ativa no desenvolvimento de comunidades online. Universidade de Aveiro. https://ria.ua.pt/handle/10773/13311. Accessed 29 Jan 2021

  13. Hurka C, Békés N (2019) Reviving type: practice-based research on renaissance and baroque models compared and discussed. Acute Publisher, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rocha C (2005) Projeto Tipográfico: análise e produção de fontes digitais. 3rd edn. Edições Rosari, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  16. Amado P (2019) Experimental is the new black. Preface. In: Yearbook of Type 2019. SLANTED. ISBN: 978-3-948440-01-5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henestrosa C, Meseguer L, Scaglione J (2014) Como criar tipos: do esboço à tela. Estereográfica, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hennessey BA, Amabile TM, Mueller JS (1999) Consensual assessment. Encycl Creat 1:346–359

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baer J, Kaufman JC (2019) Assessing creativity with the consensual assessment technique. In: Lebuda I, Gluaveanu VP (eds) The palgrave handbook of social creativity research. Springer, Cham, pp 27–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. McKenna HP, Arnone MP, Kaarst-Brown ML, et al (2013) Application of the consensual assessment technique in 21st-century technology-pervasive learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference of education, research and innovation (iCERi2013), pp 6410–6419

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dawkins R (2017) O gene egoísta. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  22. Napoleão E, Vanzin T, Fadel L, Braviano G (2018) Analysis of relations between typography and creativity: a systematic review. In: 9th Encontro de Tipografia on proceedings. Instituto Politécnico de Tomar, Tomar, pp 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aguillar RSSR (2015) Os direitos autorais na arte da tipografia. Revista da ABPI, pp 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang K, Nickerson JV (2017) A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Comput Hum Behav 74:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mukhtar S, Putri KYS, Sary MP, Sutjipto VW, Istiyanto SB, Azzahra AA (2020) The use of digital social media in the creative economy under quarantine conditions during the coronavirus pandemic. Int J Innov Creat Chang 13:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yustina Y, Syafii W, Vebrianto R (2020) The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers’ creative thinking through online learning in the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 9:408–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harvard Business Review Brasil Homepage. https://hbrbr.com.br/por-que-estabelecer-limites-estimula-a-inovacao/. Accessed 29 Jan 2021

  28. Lubart T (2005) How can computers be partners in the creative process: classification and commentary on the special issue. Int J Hum Comput Stud 63:365–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hibbs C, Jewett S, Sullivan M (2009) The art of lean software development. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gothelf J (2013) Lean UX: applying lean principles to improve user experience. In: Seiden J (ed) O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ratcliffe L, McNeill M (2011) Agile experience design: a digital designer’s guide to agile, lean, and continuous. Voices That Matter, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  32. ATypI (2015) Workshop programme—AtypI. www.atypi.org. https://www.atypi.org/conferences/sao-paulo-2015/workshops. Accessed 28 Feb 2021

  33. Bryman A (2012) Social research methods, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gil AC (2010) Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5th edn. Atlas, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noordzij G (2009) The stroke: theory of writing. Hyphen Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zubek R (2020) Elements of game design. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Amado P, Silva AC, Napoleão E (2021) Kickstarting type design education with SLOType. Springer, Cham, pp 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61671-7_18

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Amado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amado, P., Silva, A.C., Napoleão, E. (2021). SLOType: Empowering Users’ Autonomous Learning Within a Hybrid Methodology for Formal Type Design Education. In: Martins, N., Brandão, D., Moreira da Silva, F. (eds) Perspectives on Design and Digital Communication II. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75867-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75867-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75866-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75867-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics