Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel Spherical Fuzzy Eco-holonic Concept in Sustainable Supply Chain of Aviation Fuel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Aviation 4.0

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 372))

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to extend and combine two concepts of Eco-holonic structures and spherical fuzzy sets to introduce a novel concept of spherical fuzzy Eco-holonic structures. Both concepts consider different aspects of sustainability around the systems of real-world cases, so that caused an increase in a comprehensive analysis of the system. Eco-holonic structures help to consider many details of the system together with fuzzy logic, which assists to consider and evaluate the uncertainty around the system. Then, a multi attribute group decision making (MAGDM) method based on the spherical fuzzy Eco-holonic structure is proposed. Supply chain selection of aviation fuels is a hot topic these days and has very complexities. Sustainable supply chain (SSC) selection of aviation fuels is the most significant field of study among all aviation fuel supply chain problems because of many intuitive criteria that have to be considered through the decision-making procedure. Constructing and defining such an intuitive and comprehensive model for the aviation fuel supply chain is still out of sight, even though the significant research that have been done in this field. Another hardness of SSC in the aviation fuel is the satisfaction of all criteria based on such a complicated model. In this chapter, a spherical fuzzy Eco-holonic structure is defined for the sustainable supply chain of aviation fuels problem. Then, the proposed MAGDM method in SF Eco-holonic structure is applied to solve the SSC of aviation fuel problem. To show the feasibility and applicability of the proposed SF eco-holonic structure, it is applied in the aviation fuel SSC problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nygren, E., Aleklett, K., Höök, M.: Aviation fuel and future oil production scenarios. Energy Policy (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. International Energy Agency (IEA). Available: https://www.iea.org/. Accessed 30 Oct 2020

  3. U. S. E. I. Energy Information Administration: Internaltional Energy Outlook 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf. Sci. (Ny) (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C.: A novel spherical fuzzy QFD method and its application to the linear delta robot technology development. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103348

  8. Donyatalab, Y., Seyfi-Shishavan, S.A., Farrokhizadeh, E., Kutlu Gündoğdu, Y., Kahraman, C.: Spherical fuzzy linear assignment method for multiple criteria group decision-making problems. Informatica (2020). https://doi.org/10.15388/20-infor433

  9. MIT PARTNER Center: U.S. Fuel Trends Analysis, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mella, P.: The holonic revolution. holons, holarchies and holonic networks. The Ghost ... —Piero Mella—Google Books

    Google Scholar 

  11. Capra, F., March, R.: The turning point: science, society and the rising culture. Phys. Today (1982). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2914857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Babiceanu, R.F., Chen, F.F., Sturges, R.H.: Real-time holonic scheduling of material handling operations in a dynamic manufacturing environment. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2004.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dani, S., Backhouse, C.J., Burns, N.D.: Application of transactional analysis in supply chain networks: a potential holonic mediating tool. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/095440540421800510

  14. Shafaei, S., Aghaee, N.G.: Biological network simulation using holonic multiagent systems. In: Proceedings—UKSim 10th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, EUROSIM/UKSim2008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/UKSIM.2008.23

  15. Zhang, J., Gao, L., Chan, F.T.S., Li, P.: A holonic architecture of the concurrent integrated process planning system. J. Mater. Process. Technol. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00233-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng, A.H.C., Yeung, R.W.H, Cheung, E.H.M.: HSCS—the design of a holonic shopfloor control system. In: IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, ETFA (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/etfa.1996.573288

  17. Chirn, D., McFarlane, J.-L.: Building holonic systems in today’s factories: a migration strategy, CUED Publications database

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mcfarlane, S.B.D.: State of the art of holonic systems in production planning and control | Semantic Scholar

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akturk, M.S., Turkcan, A.: Cellular manufacturing system design using a holonistic approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050028124

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Amiri, A.: Designing a distribution network in a supply chain system: Formulation and efficient solution procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.018

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark, K.B.: Design Rules, vol. 1. The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, A.P.: Worlds within worlds. The holarchy of life—Kindle edition by Smith, A.P.. Health, Fitness & Dieting Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilber, K.: Messenger of the Kosmos, by Ashok, A.V. Hyderabad, India

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beer, S.: The Heart of Enterprise, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beer, S.: Brain of the Firm, 2nd edn. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mesarovic, D.T.Y., Macko, M.D.: Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems: Mesarovic, M.D., Macko, D., Takahara, Y. Amazon.com: Books

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shimizu, H.: A General Approach to Complex Systems in Bioholonics, pp. 204–223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schilling, M.A.: Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Manag. Rev. (2000). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3312918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jacak, W.: Intelligent Robotic Systems : Design, Planning, and Control, undefined (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kusumi, N., Hirasawa, K., Obayashi, M.: A holonic control system based on a universal learning network. Electr. Eng. Japan (English Transl. Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi) (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/eej.4391240408

  31. Mareschal, B.: Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90254-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma, J., Fan, Z.P., Huang, L.H.: A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Roostaee, R., Izadikhah, M., Lotfi, F.H., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M.: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making method for supplier selection with vikor method. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijfsa.2012010101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tavana, M., Zareinejad, M., Di Caprio, D., Kaviani, M.A.: An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT method for outsourcing reverse logistics. Appl. Soft Comput. J. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saaty, R.W.: The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math. Model. (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Hwang, C.-L., Lin, M.-J.: Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chu, A.T.W., Kalaba, R.E., Spingarn, K.: A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933438

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Pekelman, D., Sen, S.K.: Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights. Manage. Sci. (1974). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.20.8.1217

  39. Wang, Z., Li, K.W., Xu, J.: A mathematical programming approach to multi-attribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment information. Expert Syst. Appl. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeleny, M.: Attribute-dynamic attitude model (ADAM). Manage. Sci. (1976). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.23.1.12

  41. Çalı, S., Balaman, ŞY.: A novel outranking based multi criteria group decision making methodology integrating ELECTRE and VIKOR under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hung, C.C., Chen, L.H.: A multiple criteria group decision making model with entropy weight in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Lect. Notes Electric. Eng. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3517-2-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vlachos, I.K., Sergiadis, G.D.: Intuitionistic fuzzy information—applications to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit. Lett. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2006.07.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, S.F., Liu, S.Y.: A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection. Expert Syst. Appl. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D.: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Air Transport Action Group (2020). Available: https://www.atag.org/facts-figures.html

  47. Tretheway, M.W., Markhvida, K.: The aviation value chain: economic returns and policy issues. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, L., Ren, J.: Multi-attribute sustainability evaluation of alternative aviation fuels based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy grey relational analysis. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rye, L., Blakey, S., Wilson, C.W.: Sustainability of supply or the planet: a review of potential drop-in alternative aviation fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/b918197k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gudiel Pineda, P.J., Liou, J.J.H., Hsu, C.C., Chuang, Y.C.: An integrated MCDM model for improving airline operational and financial performance. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.003

  51. Lee, K.C., Tsai, W.H., Yang, C.H., Lin, Y.Z.: An MCDM approach for selecting green aviation fleet program management strategies under multi-resource limitations. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Feng, C.M., Wang, R.T.: Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00003-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Chang, Y.H., Yeh, C.H.: A new airline safety index. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00047-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun, X., Gollnick, V., Stumpf, E.: Robustness consideration in multi-criteria decision making to an aircraft selection problem J. . Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shojaei, P., Seyed Haeri, S.A., Mohammadi, S.: Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.05.006

  56. Bongo, M.F., Alimpangog, K.M.S., Loar, J.F., Montefalcon, J.A., Ocampo, L.A.: An application of DEMATEL-ANP and PROMETHEE II approach for air traffic controllers’ workload stress problem: a case of mactan civil aviation authority of the Philippines. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shanmugam, A., Paul Robert, T.: Ranking of aircraft maintenance organization based on human factor performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.07.017

  58. Rodger, J.A., George, J.A.: Triple bottom line accounting for optimizing natural gas sustainability: a statistical linear programming fuzzy ILOWA optimized sustainment model approach to reducing supply chain global cybersecurity vulnerability through information and communications. J. Clean. Prod. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business, Choice Rev. Online (1999). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-3997

  60. Nikolaou, I.E., Evangelinos, K.I., Allan, S.: A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Slaper, T., Hall, T.: The triple bottom line : what is it and how does it work? Indiana Univ. Kelley Sch. Bus. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A.: A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ávila-Gutiérrez, M.J., Aguayo-González, F., Marcos-Bárcena, M., Lama-Ruiz, J.R., Peralta-Álvarez, M.E.: Arquitectura holónica de referencia para empresas de fabricación sostenibles distribuidas. DYNA (2017). https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v84n200.53095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ávila-Gutiérrez, M.J., Martín-Gómez, A., Aguayo-González, F., Lama-Ruiz, J.R.: Eco-holonic 4.0 circular business model to conceptualize sustainable value chain towards digital transition. Sustainability (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051889

  65. Gündoǧdu, F.K., Kahraman, C.: Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Donyatalab, Y., Farrokhizadeh, E., Garmroodi, S.D.S., Shishavan, S.A.S.: Harmonic mean aggregation operators in spherical fuzzy environment and their group decision making applications. J. Mult. Log. Soft Comput. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kutlu Gundogdu, F., Kahraman, C.: Extension of WASPAS with spherical fuzzy sets. Informatics (2019). https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2019.206

  68. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C.: A novel fuzzy TOPSIS method using emerging interval-valued spherical fuzzy sets. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.003

  69. Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S.: Spherical aggregation operators and their application in multiattribute group decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C.: A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Comput. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w

  71. Gündoğdu, F.K., Kahraman, C.: Extension of WASPAS with spherical fuzzy sets. J. Mult. Log. Soft Comput. 30(2), 269–292 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Mahmood, T.: GRA method based on spherical linguistic fuzzy Choquet integral environment and its application in multi-attribute decision-making problems. Math. Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-018-0266-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Aydoğdu, A., Gül, S.: A novel entropy proposition for spherical fuzzy sets and its application in multiple attribute decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Grover, N.: A Generalized TOPSIS method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making considering different scenarios of attributes weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21(2), 369–387 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0563-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Awang, S.R., Zare, H., Jamal, N.M.: Decision making methods based on fuzzy aggregation operators: three decades review from 1986 to 2017. Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decis. Making (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201830001X

  76. Solomon, S. et al.: Summary for policymakers. In: Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M., Mill. H.L.: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York Cambridge Univ. Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/446727a

  77. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks: Executive Summary 2019, aem (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Metz, B., Meyer, L., Bosch, P.: Climate change 2007 mitigation of climate change (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Annual Energy Outlook 2020. Available: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/. Accessed 27 Oct 2020

  80. U.S. Energy Information Agency: Annual Energy Outlook 2019 with projections to 2050. Annu. Energy Outlook 2019 with Proj. to 2050 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ren, J., Manzardo, A., Mazzi, A., Zuliani, F., Scipioni, A.: Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zhao, S.Y., Li, W.J.: Fast asynchronous parallel stochastic gradient descent: a lock-free approach with convergence guarantee. In: 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kandaramath Hari, T., Yaakob, Z., Binitha, N.N.: Aviation biofuel from renewable resources: routes, opportunities and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.095

  84. Zahran, S., Iverson, T., McElmurry, S.P., Weiler, S.: The effect of leaded aviation gasoline on blood lead in children. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1086/691686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Airport Suppliers (Aviation Fuel Suppliers). Available: https://www.airport-suppliers.com/suppliers/fuel-handling/. Accessed 31 Oct 2020

  86. Aviation Fuel Market by Product and Geography—Forecast and Analysis 2020–2024 (Technavio), Feb-2020. Available: https://www.technavio.com/report/aviation-fuel-market-industry-analysis. Accessed 31 Oct 2020

  87. Ren, J., Fedele, A., Mason, M., Manzardo, A., Scipioni, A.: Fuzzy multi-actor multi-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Afgan, N.H., Carvalho, M.G.: Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ren, J., Xu, D., Cao, H., Wei, S., Dong, L., Goodsite, M.E.: Sustainability decision support framework for industrial system prioritization. AIChE J. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Macka, Istanbul, Turkey

    Fariba Farid & Yaser Donyatalab

Authors
  1. Fariba Farid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaser Donyatalab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fariba Farid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Cengiz Kahraman

  2. Air Force Academy, National Defence University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Serhat Aydın

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farid, F., Donyatalab, Y. (2022). Novel Spherical Fuzzy Eco-holonic Concept in Sustainable Supply Chain of Aviation Fuel. In: Kahraman, C., Aydın, S. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Aviation 4.0. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 372. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75067-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation