Skip to main content

Application of Fragility Analysis to Timber-Framed Structures for Seismic and Robustness Assessments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
18th International Probabilistic Workshop (IPW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 153))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the past few years, the construction of multi-storey timber buildings has increased significantly in locations where high-intensity ground motions are likely to occur. On the other hand, the fast development of wood engineered products, as glued-laminated timber (GLT) and cross-laminated timber (CLT), has been challenging researchers to provide adequate guidelines for the design and assessment of structures built in seismic regions. Some guidelines and analysis methods considered in seismic design can improve robustness, commonly described as the ability of structures to sustain limited damage without disproportionate effects. This paper proposes a probabilistic methodology for seismic and robustness assessment of timber-framed structures. The seismic performance and the progressive collapse potential of a three-storey building are here exemplified through the proposed methodology, which accounts for uncertainties in mechanical properties of members and connections, as well as for external loads. The Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) was used in each assessment to generate a set of 1000 structural models. Each structural model corresponds to a realization of the random variables used to define the structural model. Incremental dynamic analyses were performed to develop seismic fragility curves for different damage levels. The fragility functions for robustness assessment were developed for distinct damage scenarios, exploiting the results of an alternate load path analysis (ALPA) that involved the performance of nonlinear static analyses (pushdown analyses). The methodology presented is suitable for risk-based assessments that consider the occurrence of different exposures, such as earthquakes, impacts, and explosions, while considering the direct and indirect consequences of failures. However, the methodology involves time-consuming analyses with distinct load scenarios, which can constitute a burdening task within a typical building design phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CEN. (2013). EN 1998–1: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardisation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Branco, J. M., & Neves, L. A. (2011). Robustness of timber structures in seismic areas. Engineering Structures, 33(11), 3099–3105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huber, J. A., Ekevad, M., Girhammar, U. A., & Berg, S. (2019). Structural robustness and timber buildings—A review. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 14(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Melchers, R. E., & Beck, A. T. (2018). Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Köhler, J., Sørensen, J. D., & Faber, M. H. (2007). Probabilistic modelling of timber structures. Structural Safety, 29(4), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Casagrande, D., Bezzi, S., D’Arenzo, G., Schwendner, S., Polastri, A., Seim, W., & Piazza, M. (2020). A methodology to determine the seismic low-cycle fatigue strength of timber connections. Construction and Building Materials, 231, 117026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vamvatsikos, D., & Fragiadakis, M. (2010). Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39(2), 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Starossek, U., & Haberland, M. (2010). Disproportionate collapse: Terminology and procedures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 24(6), 519–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellingwood, B. R., Smilowitz, R., Dusenberry, D. O., Duthinh, D., Lew, H. S., & Carino, N. J. (2007). Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alam, M. S., & Barbosa, A. R. (2018). Probabilistic seismic demand assessment accounting for finite element model class uncertainty: Application to a code-designed URM infilled reinforced concrete frame building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(15), 2901–2920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Callegari, E. (2009). Caratterizzazione del comportamento di telai sismoresistenti in legno lamellare, MS thesis (in Italian). Trento, Italy: Universita degli Studi di Trento.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CEN. (2004a). EN 1995-1-1:2004—Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures—Part 1-1: General—Common rules and rules for buildings (Vol. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigues, L. G., Branco, J. M., Neves, L. A., & Barbosa, A. R. (2018). Seismic assessment of a heavy-timber frame structure with ring-doweled moment-resisting connections. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(3), 1341–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodrigues, L. G. (2019). Robustness of multi-storey timber buildings in seismic regions, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  15. . (2004b), EN 10025-2:2004, European standard for hot-rolled structural steel. Part 2—Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural steels.

    Google Scholar 

  16. CEN. (2005a), EN 14080 Timber structures—Glued laminated timber Requirements. European Committee for Standardisation.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blass, H. J., & Fellmoser, P. (2004). Design of solid wood panels with cross layers. In Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Timber Engineering 2014, 14–17 June, Lahti, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKenna, F. (2011). OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(4), 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Polastri, A., Tomasi, R., Piazza, M., & Smith, I. (2013). Moment resisting dowelled joints in timber structures: Mechanical behaviour under cyclic tests. Ingegneria Sismica, 30(4), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  20. United States Department of Defense. (2016). UFC 4-023-0.3. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CEN. (2006). EN 1991-1-7 (2006) Actions on structures. Part 1-7: General actions—Accidental actions. European Committee for Standardisation.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ARUP. (2011). Review of international research on structural robustness and disproportionate collapse (Tech. Rep.), London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly financed by FEDER funds through the Competitiveness and Internationalization Operational Programme COMPETE, Portugal 2020, and by national funds through FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology within the Timquake project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032031, and PhD grant PD/BD/113679/2015 included in the InfraRisk-PhD program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodrigues, L.G., Branco, J.M., Neves, L.A.C., Barbosa, A.R. (2021). Application of Fragility Analysis to Timber-Framed Structures for Seismic and Robustness Assessments. In: Matos, J.C., et al. 18th International Probabilistic Workshop. IPW 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 153. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73615-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73616-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics