Skip to main content

Estimation of Directed Functional Connectivity in Neurofeedback Training Focusing on the State of Attention

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

The directed transfer function (DTF) is a measure based on the concept of Granger’s causality, which associated with a neurofeedback system, can represent an important analysis tool to support the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Defined in the structure of the multivariate autoregressive model (MVAR), the DTF provides a spectral estimate of the strength and direction of any causal link between the signals acquired by electroencephalography (EEG). This study aims to estimate the directed functional connectivity related to the attention status of healthy adult individuals during neurofeedback sessions, aiming to better understand how the neuronal regions communicate and influence each other’s activity and study the feasibility of using these algorithms with neurofeedback. Data were collected from 19 individuals, eleven male and eight female, with an average age of 21.21 years, standard deviation of 2.39 and an age range of 18–26 years. As a result, they were able to identify changes in the direction and strength of the interaction flow between certain brain regions that occurred during the sessions, suggesting that the sessions enabled individuals to activate brain regions related to the state of attention. The main contribution presented in the study was the use of the mathematical methods mentioned to identify and analyze brain modulations in individuals who participated in neurofeedback sessions related to the strengthening of the state of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaur C, Singh P, Sahni S (2019) Towards efficacy of EEG neurofeedback from traditional to advanced approach: a review. Biomed Pharmacol J 12:619–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherlin LH, Arns M, Lubar J et al (2011) Neurofeedback and basic learning theory: implications for research and practice. J Neurother 15:292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Larsen S, Sherlin L (2013) Neurofeedback: an emerging technology for treating central nervous system dysregulation. Psychiatr Clin 36:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young KD, Zotev V, Phillips R et al (2014) Real-time FMRI neurofeedback training of amygdala activity in patients with major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE 9(2):e88785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamura-Palacios EM, de Almeida Benevides MC, Penha Zago-Gomes M et al (2012) Auditory event-related potentials (P3) and cognitive changes induced by frontal direct current stimulation in alcoholics according to Lesch alcoholism typology. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 15:601–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakamura-Palacios EM, Lopes IBC, Souza RA et al (2016) Ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) as a target of the dorsolateral prefrontal modulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in drug addiction. J Neural Transm 123:1179–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai Z, De Souza J, Lim J et al (2017) EEG cortical connectivity analysis of working memory reveals topological reorganization in theta and alpha bands. Front Hum Neurosci 11:237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Wu X, Wen X, Lei X, Gao Y, Yao L (2019) Exploring directed functional connectivity based on electroencephalography source signals using a global cortex factor-based multivariate autoregressive model. J Neurosci Methods 318:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friston KJ (2011) Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect 1:13–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wen X, Rangarajan G, Ding M (2013) Multivariate Granger causality: an estimation framework based on factorization of the spectral density matrix. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 371:20110610

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybernet 84:463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutta S, Singh M, Kumar A (2018) Automated classification of non-motor mental task in electroencephalogram based brain-computer interface using multivariate autoregressive model in the intrinsic mode function domain. Biomed Sig Process Control 43:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamiński M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL (2001) Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybernet 85:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D et al (2008) Tracking the time-varying cortical connectivity patterns by adaptive multivariate estimators. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:902–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hata M, Kazui H, Tanaka T et al (2016) Functional connectivity assessed by resting state EEG correlates with cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease—an eLORETA study. Clin Neurophys 127:1269–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Umesh DS, Tikka SK, Goyal N, Nizamie SH, Sinha VK (2016) Resting state theta band source distribution and functional connectivity in remitted schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett 630:199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Storti SF, Boscolo Galazzo I, Montemezzi S, Menegaz G, Pizzini FB (2017) Dual-echo ASL contributes to decrypting the link between functional connectivity and cerebral blow flow. Hum Brain Mapp 38:5831–5844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehmann D, Faber PL, Gianotti LRR, Kochi K, Pascual-Marqui RD (2006) Coherence and phase locking in the scalp EEG and between LORETA model sources, and microstates as putative mechanisms of brain temporo-spatial functional organization. J Phys Paris 99:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cannon R, Congedo M, Lubar J, Hutchens T (2009) Differentiating a network of executive attention: LORETA neurofeedback in anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Int J Neurosci 119:404–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM et al (2000) Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 10:120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kus R, Kaminski M, Blinowska KJ (2004) Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:1501–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ligeza TS, Wyczesany M, Tymorek AD, Kamiński M (2016) Interactions between the prefrontal cortex and attentional systems during volitional affective regulation: an effective connectivity reappraisal study. Brain Topogr 29:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. He B, Astolfi L, Valdés-Sosa PA et al (2019) Electrophysiological brain connectivity: theory and implementation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 66:2115–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Brazilian agencies FAPES, CAPES and CNPq (process no 80615503, 304049/2019-0, 307531/2018-0) (FAPES/CNPq No. 05/2017—PRONEM, TO: 84/2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. D. Casagrande .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Casagrande, W.D., Nakamura-Palacios, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (2022). Estimation of Directed Functional Connectivity in Neurofeedback Training Focusing on the State of Attention. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_250

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_250

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics