Abstract
Urban nature delivers proven positive effects to people living in cities from a social, environmental and financial perspective. The role of urban nature in contributing to new sustainable urban policies has been recognised as crucial in the planning agenda of most cities across the world. With effective nature-based investments, the benefits of urban nature are highlighted and enhanced. If decision makers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of the importance of the connections between urban nature and human health and wellbeing is to be improved, it is necessary to provide a more correct, explicit, and appropriate framework for valuing natural and non-market goods and services. This study argues for an approach aimed at integrating Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) with Urban Ecosystem Services (UES) to deliver a more effective economic valuation of the net benefits of nature-based investment. We do this by exploring different features of CBA and UES to identify and highlight different money-based valuation methods for putting a price on urban nature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson G, Mourato S (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. OECD, Paris
Bouwma I, Schleyer C, Primmer E, Winkler KJ, Berrye P, Young J, … Vadineanu A (2018) Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies. Ecosyst Serv 29:213–222
Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystems? Ecol Econ 63:616–626
Boyle KJ (2003) Introduction to revealed preference methods. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp 259–268
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, … van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260
Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, … Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers Ecol Environ 7(1):21–28
de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272
de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408
Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O, Olazabal E, Geneletti D, Orru H, … Faehnle M (2014) Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. J Environ Manag 146:107–115
Evers CR, Wardropper CB, Branoff B, Granek EF, Hirsch SL, Link TE, … Wilson C (2018) The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: a literature review. Global Ecol Conserv 13:e00362
Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ 86:235–245
Hansjürgens B (2004) Economic valuation through cost-benefit analysis–possibilities and limitations. Toxicology 205(3):241–252
Kaplan R (1983) The role of nature in the urban context. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Behavior and the natural environment. Springer, New York, NY, pp 127–216
Lepczyk CA, Aronson MF, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS (2017) Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 67(9):799–807
Ma J, Henneberry J, Privitera R (2020) Cost benefit analysis of proposed green interventions to promote mental health and wellbeing (research report). Retrieved from improving wellbeing through urban nature website: http://iwun.uk/findings/
Maland MM (2012) The return on investment of parks and open space. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia (USA)
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington DC
Müller F, Burkhard B (2012) The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):26–30
Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environ Dev Sustain 10(1):89–106
Nikodinoska N, Paletto A, Pastorella F, Granvik M, Franzese PP (2018) Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: the case of uppsala (Sweden). Ecol Model 368:411–424
Olander LP, Johnston RJ, Tallis H, Kagan J, Maguire LA, Polasky S, … Palmer M (2018) Benefit relevant indicators: ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes. Ecol Indic 85:1262–1272
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2017) Principles of natural capital accounting. Retrieved on 16 April 2019 from https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/environmentalaccounts/methodologies/principlesofnaturalcapitalaccounting
Panduro TE, Veie KL (2013) Classification and valuation of urban green spaces—a hedonic house price valuation. Landscape Urban Plann 120:119–128
Pearce DW, Atkinson G, Mourato S (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. OECD, Paris
Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C (2012) A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Greening 11(4):351–363
Sartori D, Catalano G, Genco M, Pancotti C, Sirtori E, Vignetti S, Bo C (2014) Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects. Economic appraisal tool for cohesion policy 2014–2020
Sundberg S (2004) Replacement costs as economic values of environmental change: a review and an application to swedish sea trout habitats. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics
TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. In: Kumar P (ed) Earthscan, London and Washington
Tempesta T (2010) The recreational value of urban parks in the Veneto region (Italy). Recreation, tourism and nature in a changing world, p 236
Tempesta T (2015) Benefits and costs of urban parks: a review. Aestimum 67:127
Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Planni 81(3):167–178
Van der Pol T, Bos F, Romijn G (2017) Distributionally weighted cost-benefit analysis: from theory to practice. CPB Discussion Paper 364. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands
Voigt A, Wurster D (2015) Does diversity matter? The experience of urban nature’s diversity: case study and cultural concept. Ecosyst Serv 12:200–208
Wegner G, Pascual U (2011) Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob Environ Change 21(2):492–504
WHO, CBD Secretariat (2015) Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health: a state of knowledge review. World Health Organization
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on research undertaken as part of the IWUN project funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, ESRC, BBSRC, AHRC & Defra [NERC grant reference number NE/N013565/1]. The authors are grateful for NERC’s support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ma, J., Henneberry, J., Privitera, R. (2021). The Challenges of Valuing Urban Nature: Accounting for Urban Ecosystem Services Within the Framework of a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Nature-Based Investments. In: La Rosa, D., Privitera, R. (eds) Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. INPUT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68823-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68824-0
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)