Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Manual and Automated Decision-Making with a Logistics Serious Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logistics (ICCL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12433))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a logistics serious game that describes an anticipatory planning problem for the dispatching of trucks, barges, and trains, considering uncertainty in future container arrivals. The problem setting is conceptually easy to grasp, yet difficult to solve optimally. For this problem, we deploy a variety of benchmark algorithms, including two heuristics and two reinforcement learning implementations. We use the serious game to compare the manual performance of human decision makers with those algorithms. Furthermore, the game allows humans to create their own automated planning rules, which can also be compared with the implemented algorithms and manual game play. To illustrate the potential use of the game, we report the results of three gaming sessions: with students, with job seekers, and with logistics professionals. The experimental results show that reinforcement learning typically outperforms the human decision makers, but that the top tier of humans come very close to this algorithmic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, D., et al.: Human-guided simple search. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 209–216 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertsekas, D.P.: Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Belmont (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Buiel, E., et al.: Synchro mania - design and evaluation of a serious game creating a mind shift in transport planning. In: 46th International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference, ISAGA, pp. 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drakoulis, R., et al.: A gamified flexible transportation service for on-demand public transport. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19(3), 921–933 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M.: Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox. In: Simple Heuristics that make us Smart, pp. 3–34. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, New York City (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kefalidou, G., Ormerod, T.C.: The fast and the not-so-frugal: human heuristics for optimization problem solving. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 36 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keller, N., Katsikopoulos, K.V.: On the role of psychological heuristics in operational research; and a demonstration in military stability operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249(3), 1063–1073 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Klapp, M.A., Erera, A.L., Toriello, A.: The dynamic dispatch waves problem for same-day delivery. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 271(2), 519–534 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurapati, S., Kourounioti, I., Lukosch, H., Tavasszy, L., Verbraeck, A.: Fostering sustainable transportation operations through corridor management: a simulation gaming approach. Sustainability 10(2), 1–18 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meijer, S.A., Mayer, I.S., van Luipen, J., Weitenberg, N.: Gaming rail cargo management: exploring and validating alternative modes of organization. Simul. Gaming 43(1), 85–101 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minkoff, A.S.: A Markov decision model and decomposition heuristic for dynamic vehicle dispatching. Oper. Res. 41(1), 77–90 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rivera, A.P., Mes, M.: Dynamic multi-period freight consolidation. In: Corman, F., Voß, S., Negenborn, R.R. (eds.) ICCL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9335, pp. 370–385. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24264-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pérez Rivera, A.E., Mes, M.R.K.: Anticipatory freight selection in intermodal long-haul round-trips. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 105, 176–194 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powell, W.B.: Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Raghothama, J., Meijer, S.A.: A review of gaming simulation in transportation. In: Meijer, S.A., Smeds, R. (eds.) ISAGA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8264, pp. 237–244. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04954-0_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rossetti, R.J.F., Almeida, J.A.E., Kokkinogenis, Z., Gonçalves, J.: Playing transportation seriously: applications of serious games to artificial transportation systems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 28(4), 107–112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L.K., Müller, K.-R. (eds.): Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11700. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Simon, H.A.: Bounded rationality. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds.) Utility and Probability. The New Palgrave, pp. 15–18. Palgrave Macmillan, London (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_5

  20. Sterman, J.D.: Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manag. Sci. 35(3), 321–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Heeswijk, W.J.A., Mes, M.R.K., Schutten, J.M.J.: The delivery dispatching problem with time windows for urban consolidation centers. Transp. Sci. 53(1), 203–221 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Venkatesh, V.: Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Q. 23(2), 239–260 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Voccia, S.A., Campbell, A.M., Thomas, B.W.: The same-day delivery problem for online purchases. Transp. Sci. 53(1), 167–184 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiener, J.M., Ehbauer, N.N., Mallot, H.A.: Path planning and optimization in the traveling salesman problem: nearest neighbor vs. region-based strategies. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, pp. 1–21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering and Business Information Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Martijn Mes & Wouter van Heeswijk

Authors
  1. Martijn Mes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wouter van Heeswijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martijn Mes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz

  2. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Martijn Mes

  3. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Stefan Voß

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mes, M., van Heeswijk, W. (2020). Comparison of Manual and Automated Decision-Making with a Logistics Serious Game. In: Lalla-Ruiz, E., Mes, M., Voß, S. (eds) Computational Logistics. ICCL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59747-4_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59747-4_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59746-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59747-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation