Skip to main content

Hospital Ethics Committees and the Dismissal of Nursing Ethical Concerns: A Feminist Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nursing Ethics: Feminist Perspectives

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, healthcare institutions in many countries have used Hospital Ethics Committees (HECs) to guide practitioners in relation to the ethical dimension of their clinical practice. Many states have encouraged or mandated hospitals to have a multi-professional membership in HECs to deal with the everyday ethical challenges that arise. As the mandate of HECs evolved, principle-based ethics became the dominant approach underpinning ethical consultation in HECs. In this chapter, I explore the discursive space of HECs. I propose and defend two reasons to explain why nursing ethical concerns are dismissed in these spaces: (1) the voices that are most heard and valued in discussing issues of concern in patient care are dependent on the hierarchical setting. Like hospitals, in HECS, profession, rank and academic degree often determine the extent to which permission is given to speak freely and authoritatively; (2) the application of principle-based ethics reduces the significance of care practices and dismisses nursing ethical concerns. I then turn to the development of care ethical approaches, the feminist turn in care ethics and the language they offer to grasp issues of nursing care and thematize the relevance of power. An analysis of two case consultations illustrates how a feminist approach can shed light on issues of care that nurses are struggling with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See interview with Joan Tronto in this book.

References

  • Alnes, Rigmor Einang, Marit Kirkevold, and Kirsti Skoydahl. 2011. Marte Meo counselling: a promising tool to support positive interactions between residents with dementia and nurses in nursing homes. Journal of Research in Nursing 16 (5): 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom, and James F. Childress. 1983. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2nd ed. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Patricia. 1994. The tradition and skill of interpretative phenomenology in studying health, illness, and care practices. In Interpretative Phenomenology, Embodiment, Caring and Ethics in Health and Illness, ed. Patricia Benner, 99–127. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Patricia, and Judith Wrubel. 1989. The Primacy of Caring. Stress and Coping in Health and Illness. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Anne, and John R. Scudder. 1990. The Practical, Moral, and Personal Sense of Nursing. A Phenomenological Philosophy of Practice. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosk, Charles, and Joel Frader. 1998. Institutional ethics committees: Sociological oxymoron, empirical black box. In Bioethics and Society. Constructing the Ethical Enterprise, ed. Raymond DeVries and Janardan Subedi, 16. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, Claudia. 1990. Carin and evil. Hypathia. 5 (1): 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carse, Alisa L., and Hilde Lindeman Nelson. 1996. Rehabilitating Care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics. 6 (1): 19–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, Daniel F. 1996. Beyond Caring. Hospitals, Nurses, and the Social Organization of Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Condon, Esther H. 1992. Nursing and the caring metaphor: Gender and political influences on an ethics of care. Nursing Outlook. 40 (1): 14–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cranford, Ronald E., and A. Edward Doudera. 1984. The emergence of institutional ethics committees. Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (1): 13–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Brito Menezes Gonçalves, Gabriela, and Darci de Oliveira Santa Rosa. 2019. Nurses performance in clinical ethics committees and commissions: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics 26 (3): 688–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Berenice, and Joan Tronto. 1990. Toward a feminist theory of care. In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Life, ed. Emily Abel and Margaret Nelson, 36–54. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Patricia. 1991a. Moral Ordering and the Social Construction of Bioethics. Unpublished dissertation. University of California, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. The disciplinary emergence of bioethics and bioethics committees: Moral ordering and its legitimation. Sociological Focus 24 (2): 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. Renee. 1990. The evolution of American bioethics: A sociological perspective. In Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics, ed. George Weisz, 201–217. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. What Are Friends For? Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, Sarah T. 1989. The role of caring in a theory of nursing ethics. Hypathia. 4 (2): 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadow, Sally. 1985. Nurse and patient: The caring relationship. In Caring, Curing, Coping. Nurse, Physician, Patient, Relationships, ed. Anne H. Bishop and John R. Scudder, 31–43. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holly, Cheryl Malahan. 1986. Staff Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making. A Descriptive Study of Selected Situational Variables. Unpublished dissertation. Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, Allison M. 1995. Caring as a feminist practice of moral reason. In Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Philosophy, ed. Virginia Held, 179–202. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Sharon. 2005. … And a Time to Die. How American Hospitals Shape the End of Life. New York: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keffer M. 1997. Why nursing ethics committees? HEC Forum 9 (1): 50–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. San Franscisco: Harber & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlen, Helen. 2009. Hospital Ethics Committees in the US and in Germany. Frankfurt a. Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Plädoyer für eine widerständige Care-Praxis—Zur Entwicklung von Care-Ethiken im internationalen Vergleich und ihrem Status in der Pflege. In Kleibel, Veronika; Urban-Huser, Catherine (Hg.): Caring—Pflicht oder Kür? Gestaltungsräume für eine fürsorgliche Pflegepraxis. Wien: Fakultas. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Caring about Care in the Hospital Arena and Nurses’ voices in hospital ethics committees. Three decades of experiences. In Care in Healthcare. Reflections on Theory and Practice, ed. Franzsika Krause and Joachim Bold, 237–265. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Evaluation for moving ethics in health care services towards democratic care. A three pillars model: Education, companionship and open space. In Visse, Merel/Abma. 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiniger, Madeleine. 1991. Culture Care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of Nursing. New York: National League for Nursing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman Nelson, Hilde. 1996. Against caring. Journal of Clinical Ethics 3 (1): 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care. Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Morals. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Ethics from the standpoint of women. In Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference, ed. Deborah L. Rohode. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean. 1965. The Moral Judgement of the Child. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverby, Susan. 1987a. A caring dilemma: Womanhood and nursing in historical perspective. Nursing Research 36 (1): 5–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987b. Ordered to Care. The Dilemma of American Nursing, 1850–1945. New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Nancy. 1990. The Elements of Nursing: A Model for Nursing. London: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Judith W. 1986. Handbook for Hospital Ethics Committees. Practical suggestions for ethics committee members to plan, develop, and evaluate their roles and responsibilities. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, David. 2003. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Susan, and Laurie Zoloth-Dorfman. 1996. She said/ he said: Ethics consultation and the gendered discourse. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 7 (4): 321–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, Susan. 1992. No longer patient. Feminist Ethics and health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sichel, Betty A. 1992. Ethics of caring and the institutional ethics committee. In Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics, ed. Helen Bequaert Holmes and Laura M. Purdy, 113–123. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan. 1994. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C. 2013. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Margaret Urban. 1993. Keeping moral space open. Images of ethics consulting. Hastings Center Report 23 (2): 33–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Jean. 2012. Nursing: Human Science and Human Care. A Theory of Nursing. 2nd ed. London: Jons and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Kohlen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kohlen, H. (2020). Hospital Ethics Committees and the Dismissal of Nursing Ethical Concerns: A Feminist Perspective. In: Kohlen, H., McCarthy, J. (eds) Nursing Ethics: Feminist Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49104-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49104-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49103-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49104-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics