Abstract
Global relations remain uneven and contested, but the contemporary world is experiencing the highest intensity of globalization in human history. Now, following a global financial crisis, the emergence of local versus global populism, the continuing intensification of global ecological crisis, and the Covid crisis, it is important to reflect on both the positive possibilities and confronting challenges of globalization. This essay examines the complexity of contemporary globalization focusing on questions of what makes for a positive world. A manifesto for sustainable globalization needs to confront the contemporary human condition, ecologically, economically, politically, and culturally. In ecological terms, this means more than setting up carbon-accounting schemes and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In economic terms, it means rethinking the ever-expanding reach of global capitalism, particularly its more rapacious modalities. Politically, though the usual response is to argue for more cosmopolitanism, this has become complicated by the ‘return’ to reactionary forms of localism. And in cultural terms, we need principles for celebrating differences while recognizing rather than overcoming the continuing boundaries of identity and meaning. In these terms, this essay seeks to respond to present challenges and set out a matrix of principles—principles in tension—for living in a complex global world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/statement-manifesto/ last accessed 23 July 2018.
- 2.
Here, to be precise, ‘the social’ itself is grounded in this earth, this planet, and is therefore treated as always in tension with ‘the natural’. The natural in turn is understood as the infinite extension of time/space that carries far beyond human social engagement on planet earth, including beyond what we are calling the social domain of ecology—namely, that part of the natural which encompasses the human. Hence, we are more comprehensively pointing to a contradictory social/natural grounding. These tensions, expressed in the classical nature/culture trope, concern the place of humans as both part of the natural world, but simultaneously makers of enduring social meaning that abstracts humans from nature.
- 3.
www.metropolis.org last accessed 9 January 2019.
- 4.
For a sense of the range of persons involved in this project see www.circlesofsustainability.org/about/about-us/.
References
Beck, U. 2016. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Breton, A. 1924. ‘Manifesto for Surrealism’ in Manifestoes of Surrealism, 1972 edn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
James, P. 2018. Creating Capacities for Human Flourishing: An Alternative Approach to Human Development. In Cultures of Sustainability and Wellbeing: Theories, Histories, Policies, ed. Paola Spinozzi and Mazzanti Massimiliano. London: Routledge.
James, P., L. Magee, A. Scerri, and M.B. Steger. 2015. Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge.
Juergensmeyer, M., M. Steger, and S. Sassen (eds.). 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelso, L.O., and M.J. Adler. 1958. The Capitalist Manifesto. New York: Random House.
Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1848. The Communist Manifesto. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Oosteveer, Peter, and David A. Sonnefeld. 2012. Food, Globalization and Sustainability. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shaw, B. 1988. Poverty: Absolute or Relative? Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (1): 27–36.
United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. 2017. New Urban Agenda. New York: United Nations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
James, P. (2020). A Manifesto for Good Globalization: Or, the Manifesto as Method. In: Rossi, I. (eds) Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44058-9_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44058-9_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44057-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44058-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)